Mullvad vs IVPN — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of Mullvad and IVPN. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

Mullvad scores 88.0/100 (A) while IVPN scores 93.0/100 (A+) on the Nerq Trust Score. IVPN leads by 5.0 points. Mullvad is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars, Nerq Verified. IVPN is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars, Nerq Verified.
88.0
A verified
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcevpn
Security80
Maintenance75
Documentation70
vs
93.0
A+ verified
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcevpn
Security80
Maintenance75
Documentation70

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric Mullvad IVPN
Trust Score88.0/10093.0/100
GradeAA+
Stars00
Categoryuncategorizeduncategorized
Security8080
ComplianceN/AN/A
Maintenance7575
Documentation7070
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedYesYes

Verdict

IVPN leads with a trust score of 93.0/100 compared to Mullvad's 88.0/100 (a 5.0-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Mullvad leads on security with a score of 80/100 compared to IVPN's 80/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

Mullvad demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (75/100 vs 75/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

Mullvad has better documentation (70/100 vs 70/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

Mullvad has 0 GitHub stars while IVPN has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose Mullvad if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Choose IVPN if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use

Switching from Mullvad to IVPN (or vice versa)

When migrating between Mullvad and IVPN, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: Mullvad (uncategorized) and IVPN (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the Mullvad safety report and IVPN safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: Mullvad has 0 stars and IVPN has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
Mullvad Safety Report IVPN Safety Report Mullvad Alternatives IVPN Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, Mullvad or IVPN?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, Mullvad has a trust score of 88.0/100 (A) while IVPN scores 93.0/100 (A+). The 5.0-point difference suggests IVPN has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do Mullvad and IVPN compare on security?
Mullvad has a security score of 80/100 and IVPN scores 80/100. Both have comparable security profiles. Mullvad's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while IVPN's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use Mullvad or IVPN?
The choice depends on your requirements. Mullvad (uncategorized, 0 stars) and IVPN (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, Mullvad scores 88.0/100 and IVPN scores 93.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (70 vs 70), and maintenance activity (75 vs 75).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-08-24 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy