Mullvad vs ProtonVPN — Trust Score Comparison

Name: Mullvad vs ProtonVPN Trust Comparison
Creator: Nerq

Side-by-side trust comparison of Mullvad and ProtonVPN. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

Mullvad scores 88.0/100 (A) while ProtonVPN scores 95.0/100 (A+) on the Nerq Trust Score. ProtonVPN leads by 7.0 points. Mullvad is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars, Nerq Verified. ProtonVPN is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars, Nerq Verified.

Mullvad

88.0

A verified

Categoryuncategorized

Stars0

Sourcevpn

Security80

Maintenance75

Documentation70

ProtonVPN

95.0

A+ verified

Categoryuncategorized

Stars0

Sourcevpn

Security80

Maintenance75

Documentation70

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric	Mullvad	ProtonVPN
Trust Score	88.0/100	95.0/100
Grade	A	A+
Stars	0	0
Category	uncategorized	uncategorized
Security	80	80
Compliance	N/A	N/A
Maintenance	75	75
Documentation	70	70
EU AI Act Risk	N/A	N/A
Verified	Yes	Yes

Verdict

ProtonVPN leads with a trust score of 95.0/100 compared to Mullvad's 88.0/100 (a 7.0-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Mullvad leads on security with a score of 80/100 compared to ProtonVPN's 80/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

Mullvad demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (75/100 vs 75/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

Mullvad has better documentation (70/100 vs 70/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

Mullvad has 0 GitHub stars while ProtonVPN has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose Mullvad if you need:

Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Choose ProtonVPN if you need:

Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use

Switching from Mullvad to ProtonVPN (or vice versa)

When migrating between Mullvad and ProtonVPN, consider these factors:

API Compatibility: Mullvad (uncategorized) and ProtonVPN (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the Mullvad safety report and ProtonVPN safety report for known issues.
Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
Community Support: Mullvad has 0 stars and ProtonVPN has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.

Mullvad Safety Report ProtonVPN Safety Report Mullvad Alternatives ProtonVPN Alternatives

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, Mullvad or ProtonVPN?

Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, Mullvad has a trust score of 88.0/100 (A) while ProtonVPN scores 95.0/100 (A+). The 7.0-point difference suggests ProtonVPN has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.

How do Mullvad and ProtonVPN compare on security?

Mullvad has a security score of 80/100 and ProtonVPN scores 80/100. Both have comparable security profiles. Mullvad's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while ProtonVPN's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).

Should I use Mullvad or ProtonVPN?

The choice depends on your requirements. Mullvad (uncategorized, 0 stars) and ProtonVPN (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, Mullvad scores 88.0/100 and ProtonVPN scores 95.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (70 vs 70), and maintenance activity (75 vs 75).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-09-26 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.