OVPN vs Mullvad — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of OVPN and Mullvad. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

OVPN scores 82.0/100 (A-) while Mullvad scores 88.0/100 (A) on the Nerq Trust Score. Mullvad leads by 6.0 points. OVPN is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars, Nerq Verified. Mullvad is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars, Nerq Verified.
82.0
A- verified
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcevpn
Security80
Maintenance75
Documentation70
vs
88.0
A verified
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcevpn
Security80
Maintenance75
Documentation70

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric OVPN Mullvad
Trust Score82.0/10088.0/100
GradeA-A
Stars00
Categoryuncategorizeduncategorized
Security8080
ComplianceN/AN/A
Maintenance7575
Documentation7070
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedYesYes

Verdict

Mullvad leads with a trust score of 88.0/100 compared to OVPN's 82.0/100 (a 6.0-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

OVPN leads on security with a score of 80/100 compared to Mullvad's 80/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

OVPN demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (75/100 vs 75/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

OVPN has better documentation (70/100 vs 70/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

OVPN has 0 GitHub stars while Mullvad has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose OVPN if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Choose Mullvad if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use

Switching from OVPN to Mullvad (or vice versa)

When migrating between OVPN and Mullvad, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: OVPN (uncategorized) and Mullvad (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the OVPN safety report and Mullvad safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: OVPN has 0 stars and Mullvad has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
OVPN Safety Report Mullvad Safety Report OVPN Alternatives Mullvad Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, OVPN or Mullvad?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, OVPN has a trust score of 82.0/100 (A-) while Mullvad scores 88.0/100 (A). The 6.0-point difference suggests Mullvad has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do OVPN and Mullvad compare on security?
OVPN has a security score of 80/100 and Mullvad scores 80/100. Both have comparable security profiles. OVPN's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while Mullvad's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use OVPN or Mullvad?
The choice depends on your requirements. OVPN (uncategorized, 0 stars) and Mullvad (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, OVPN scores 82.0/100 and Mullvad scores 88.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (70 vs 70), and maintenance activity (75 vs 75).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-08-22 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy