Je Openclawhomeassistant bezpečný?

Openclawhomeassistant — Nerq Trust Score 66.8/100 (Stupeň C). Skóre založeno na 5 independent trust signals.

Openclawhomeassistant je software tool se skóre důvěryhodnosti Nerq 66.8/100 (C), based on 5 nezávislých datových dimenzích. Bezpečnost: 0/100. Údržba: 1/100. Popularita: 0/100. Data pocházejí z více veřejných zdrojů včetně registrů balíčků, GitHubu, NVD, OSV.dev a OpenSSF Scorecard. Naposledy aktualizováno: n/a. Strojově čitelná data (JSON).

Je Openclawhomeassistant bezpečný?

Rozpis skóre důvěryhodnosti — Openclawhomeassistant has a Nerq Trust Score of 66.8/100 (C). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.

Bezpečnostní analýza → Zpráva o soukromí Openclawhomeassistant →

Jaké je skóre důvěryhodnosti Openclawhomeassistant?

Openclawhomeassistant má Nerq skóre důvěryhodnosti 66.8/100 se stupněm C. Toto skóre je založeno na 5 nezávisle měřených dimenzích.

Bezpečnost
0
Shoda
84
Údržba
1
Dokumentace
1
Popularita
0

Jaká jsou klíčová bezpečnostní zjištění pro Openclawhomeassistant?

Nejsilnější signál Openclawhomeassistant je shoda na 84/100. Nebyly zjištěny žádné známé zranitelnosti.

⚠Bezpečnostní skóre: 0/100 (slabý)
⚠Údržba: 1/100 — nízká údržba
⚠Shoda: 84/100 — covers 43 of 52 jurisdictions
⚠Dokumentace: 1/100 — omezená dokumentace
⚠Popularita: 0/100 — přijetí komunitou

Co je Openclawhomeassistant a kdo jej spravuje?

Autor0xA2C3B1F4
KategorieDevops
Zdrojhttps://github.com/0xA2C3B1F4/OpenClawHomeAssistant
Protocolsrest · websocket

Regulační shoda

EU AI Act Risk ClassMINIMAL
Compliance Score84/100
JurisdictionsAssessed across 52 jurisdictions

Populární alternativy v devops

ansible/ansible
74.9/100 · B
github
FlowiseAI/Flowise
67.5/100 · C
github
shareAI-lab/learn-claude-code
72.1/100 · B
github
continuedev/continue
75.0/100 · B
github
wshobson/agents
79.3/100 · B
github

What Is Openclawhomeassistant?

Openclawhomeassistant is a DevOps tool: OpenClaw Home Assistant Add-on for background automation and API coverage.. Nerq Trust Score: 67/100 (C).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including bezpečnost vulnerabilities, údržba activity, license shoda, and přijetí komunitou.

How Nerq Assesses Openclawhomeassistant's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimenzích. Here is how Openclawhomeassistant performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 66.8/100 (C) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.

Who Typically Evaluates Openclawhomeassistant?

Openclawhomeassistant is commonly evaluated by:

How to read the signals: Openclawhomeassistant's measured signals (bezpečnost 0/100, údržba 1/100, dokumentace 1/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.

How to Verify Openclawhomeassistant's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — Zkontrolujte repository's bezpečnost policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active údržba.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Openclawhomeassistant's dependency tree.
  3. Recenze permissions — Understand what access Openclawhomeassistant requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Openclawhomeassistant in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=OpenClawHomeAssistant
  6. Zkontrolujte license — Confirm that Openclawhomeassistant's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses bezpečnost concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Openclawhomeassistant

When evaluating whether Openclawhomeassistant is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Openclawhomeassistant processes, stores, and transmits your data. Zkontrolujte tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency bezpečnost

Check Openclawhomeassistant's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher bezpečnost risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Openclawhomeassistant. Bezpečnost patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Openclawhomeassistant connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP shoda

Verify that Openclawhomeassistant's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Openclawhomeassistant in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Openclawhomeassistant and the EU AI Act

Openclawhomeassistant is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.

Nerq's shoda assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal shoda.

Best Practices for Using Openclawhomeassistant Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Openclawhomeassistant while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Openclawhomeassistant is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and shoda with your bezpečnost policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Openclawhomeassistant and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from bezpečnost patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Openclawhomeassistant only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for bezpečnost advisories

Subscribe to Openclawhomeassistant's bezpečnost advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Openclawhomeassistant is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Openclawhomeassistant

Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Openclawhomeassistant's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:

For each situation, compare Openclawhomeassistant's measured trust score of 66.8/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Openclawhomeassistant is suitable for any particular use.

How Openclawhomeassistant Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among DevOps tools, the average Trust Score is 63/100. Openclawhomeassistant's score of 66.8/100 is above the category average of 63/100.

This positions Openclawhomeassistant favorably among DevOps tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimenzích.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks střední in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Openclawhomeassistant and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or údržba patterns change, Openclawhomeassistant's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to bezpečnost and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced údržba, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Openclawhomeassistant's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=OpenClawHomeAssistant&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — bezpečnost, údržba, dokumentace, shoda, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Openclawhomeassistant are strengthening or weakening over time.

Openclawhomeassistant vs Alternativy

In the devops category, Openclawhomeassistant scores 66.8/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:

Hlavní závěry

Často kladené otázky

Je Openclawhomeassistant bezpečný?
OpenClawHomeAssistant se skóre důvěryhodnosti Nerq 66.8/100 (C). Nejsilnější signál: shoda (84/100). Skóre založeno na Bezpečnost (0/100), Údržba (1/100), Popularita (0/100), Dokumentace (1/100).
Jaké je skóre důvěryhodnosti Openclawhomeassistant?
OpenClawHomeAssistant: 66.8/100 (C). Skóre založeno na Bezpečnost (0/100), Údržba (1/100), Popularita (0/100), Dokumentace (1/100). Compliance: 84/100. Skóre se aktualizují, jakmile jsou k dispozici nová data. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=OpenClawHomeAssistant
Jaké jsou bezpečnější alternativy k Openclawhomeassistant?
V kategorii Devops, higher-rated alternatives include ansible/ansible (75/100), FlowiseAI/Flowise (68/100), shareAI-lab/learn-claude-code (72/100). OpenClawHomeAssistant scores 66.8/100.
Jak často se aktualizuje bezpečnostní skóre Openclawhomeassistant?
Nerq recomputes Openclawhomeassistant's trust score as new data becomes available. Current: 66.8/100 (C). API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=OpenClawHomeAssistant
Mohu používat Openclawhomeassistant v regulovaném prostředí?
Openclawhomeassistant: 66.8/100 (C). Compliance: 43 of 52 jurisdictions. EU AI Act compliant. Evaluate against your own regulatory requirements.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Viz také

Disclaimer: Skóre důvěryhodnosti Nerq jsou automatizovaná hodnocení založená na veřejně dostupných signálech. Nejsou doporučením ani zárukou. Vždy proveďte vlastní ověření.

Používáme cookies pro analýzu a ukládání do mezipaměti. Soukromí