Er Skillorchestrator sikker?

Skillorchestrator — Nerq Trust Score 55.6/100 (Karakter D). Score baseret på 5 independent trust signals.

Skillorchestrator er en software tool med en Nerq Tillidsscore på 55.6/100 (D), based on 5 uafhængige datadimensioner. Sikkerhed: 0/100. Vedligeholdelse: 1/100. Popularitet: 0/100. Data hentet fra flere offentlige kilder herunder pakkeregistre, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev og OpenSSF Scorecard. Sidst opdateret: n/a. Maskinlæsbare data (JSON).

Er Skillorchestrator sikker?

Tillidsscore detaljer — Skillorchestrator has a Nerq Trust Score of 55.6/100 (D). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.

Sikkerhedsanalyse → Skillorchestrator privatlivsrapport →

Hvad er Skillorchestrators tillidsscore?

Skillorchestrator har en Nerq Trust Score på 55.6/100 med karakteren D. Denne score er baseret på 5 uafhængigt målte dimensioner, herunder sikkerhed, vedligeholdelse og community-adoption.

Sikkerhed
0
Overholdelse
100
Vedligeholdelse
1
Dokumentation
1
Popularitet
0

Hvad er de vigtigste sikkerhedsresultater for Skillorchestrator?

Skillorchestrators stærkeste signal er overholdelse på 100/100. Ingen kendte sårbarheder er fundet.

⚠Sikkerhedsscore: 0/100 (svag)
⚠Vedligeholdelse: 1/100 — lav vedligeholdelsesaktivitet
⚠Overholdelse: 100/100 — covers 52 of 52 jurisdictions
⚠Dokumentation: 1/100 — begrænset dokumentation
⚠Popularitet: 0/100 — community-adoption

Hvad er Skillorchestrator og hvem vedligeholder det?

Udviklermltpascual
KategoriCoding
Kildehttps://github.com/mltpascual/SkillOrchestrator
Frameworksopenai · anthropic
Protocolsrest

Lovgivningsmæssig overholdelse

EU AI Act Risk ClassMINIMAL
Compliance Score100/100
JurisdictionsAssessed across 52 jurisdictions

Populære alternativer i coding

Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT
65.3/100 · C
github
ollama/ollama
64.4/100 · C
github
langchain-ai/langchain
77.0/100 · B
github
x1xhlol/system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-tools
64.4/100 · C
github
anomalyco/opencode
78.5/100 · B
github

What Is Skillorchestrator?

Skillorchestrator is a software tool in the coding category: AI Agent Skill Pack for one-shot project initialization and dokumentation.. Nerq Trust Score: 56/100 (D).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including sikkerhed vulnerabilities, vedligeholdelse activity, license overholdelse, and fællesskabsadoption.

How Nerq Assesses Skillorchestrator's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensioner. Here is how Skillorchestrator performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 55.6/100 (D) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.

Who Typically Evaluates Skillorchestrator?

Skillorchestrator is commonly evaluated by:

How to read the signals: Skillorchestrator's measured signals (sikkerhed 0/100, vedligeholdelse 1/100, dokumentation 1/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.

How to Verify Skillorchestrator's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — Gennemgå repository's sikkerhed policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active vedligeholdelse.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Skillorchestrator's dependency tree.
  3. Anmeldelse permissions — Understand what access Skillorchestrator requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Skillorchestrator in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=SkillOrchestrator
  6. Gennemgå license — Confirm that Skillorchestrator's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses sikkerhed concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Skillorchestrator

When evaluating whether Skillorchestrator is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Skillorchestrator processes, stores, and transmits your data. Gennemgå tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency sikkerhed

Check Skillorchestrator's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher sikkerhed risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Skillorchestrator. Sikkerhed patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Skillorchestrator connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP overholdelse

Verify that Skillorchestrator's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Skillorchestrator in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Skillorchestrator and the EU AI Act

Skillorchestrator is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.

Nerq's overholdelse assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal overholdelse.

Best Practices for Using Skillorchestrator Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Skillorchestrator while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Skillorchestrator is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and overholdelse with your sikkerhed policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Skillorchestrator and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from sikkerhed patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Skillorchestrator only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for sikkerhed advisories

Subscribe to Skillorchestrator's sikkerhed advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Skillorchestrator is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Skillorchestrator

Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Skillorchestrator's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:

For each situation, compare Skillorchestrator's measured trust score of 55.6/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Skillorchestrator is suitable for any particular use.

How Skillorchestrator Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among coding tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Skillorchestrator's score of 55.6/100 is near the category average of 62/100.

This places Skillorchestrator in line with the typical coding tool tool. It meets baseline expectations but does not distinguish itself from peers on trust metrics.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderat in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Skillorchestrator and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or vedligeholdelse patterns change, Skillorchestrator's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to sikkerhed and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced vedligeholdelse, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Skillorchestrator's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=SkillOrchestrator&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — sikkerhed, vedligeholdelse, dokumentation, overholdelse, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Skillorchestrator are strengthening or weakening over time.

Skillorchestrator vs Alternativer

In the coding category, Skillorchestrator scores 55.6/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:

Vigtigste pointer

Ofte stillede spørgsmål

Er Skillorchestrator sikker?
SkillOrchestrator med en Nerq Tillidsscore på 55.6/100 (D). Stærkeste signal: overholdelse (100/100). Score baseret på Sikkerhed (0/100), Vedligeholdelse (1/100), Popularitet (0/100), Dokumentation (1/100).
Hvad er Skillorchestrators tillidsscore?
SkillOrchestrator: 55.6/100 (D). Score baseret på Sikkerhed (0/100), Vedligeholdelse (1/100), Popularitet (0/100), Dokumentation (1/100). Compliance: 100/100. Scorer opdateres når nye data bliver tilgængelige. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=SkillOrchestrator
Hvad er sikrere alternativer til Skillorchestrator?
I kategorien Coding, higher-rated alternatives include Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT (65/100), ollama/ollama (64/100), langchain-ai/langchain (77/100). SkillOrchestrator scores 55.6/100.
Hvor ofte opdateres Skillorchestrators sikkerhedsscore?
Nerq recomputes Skillorchestrator's trust score as new data becomes available. Current: 55.6/100 (D). API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=SkillOrchestrator
Kan jeg bruge Skillorchestrator i et reguleret miljø?
Skillorchestrator: 55.6/100 (D). Compliance: 52 of 52 jurisdictions. EU AI Act compliant. Evaluate against your own regulatory requirements.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Se også

Disclaimer: Nerqs tillidsscorer er automatiserede vurderinger baseret på offentligt tilgængelige signaler. De udgør ikke anbefalinger eller garantier. Foretag altid din egen verificering.

Vi bruger cookies til analyse og caching. Privatliv