Er Disc Lawllm sikker?
Disc Lawllm — Nerq Trust Score 57.0/100 (Karakter D). Baseret på analyse af 4 tillidsdimensioner vurderes det som har bemærkelsesværdige sikkerhedsproblemer. Sidst opdateret: 2026-05-21.
Brug Disc Lawllm med forsigtighed. Disc Lawllm er en software tool med en Nerq Tillidsscore på 57.0/100 (D), based on 4 uafhængige datadimensioner. Under Nerqs verificerede tærskel Vedligeholdelse: 0/100. Popularitet: 0/100. Data hentet fra flere offentlige kilder herunder pakkeregistre, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev og OpenSSF Scorecard. Sidst opdateret: 2026-05-21. Maskinlæsbare data (JSON).
Er Disc Lawllm sikker?
CAUTION — Disc Lawllm has a Nerq Trust Score of 57.0/100 (D). Har moderat tillidssignaler, men viser nogle bekymrende områder that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review sikkerhed and vedligeholdelse signals before production deployment.
Hvad er Disc Lawllms tillidsscore?
Disc Lawllm har en Nerq Trust Score på 57.0/100 med karakteren D. Denne score er baseret på 4 uafhængigt målte dimensioner, herunder sikkerhed, vedligeholdelse og community-adoption.
Hvad er de vigtigste sikkerhedsresultater for Disc Lawllm?
Disc Lawllms stærkeste signal er overholdelse på 96/100. Ingen kendte sårbarheder er fundet. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.
Hvad er Disc Lawllm og hvem vedligeholder det?
| Udvikler | ShengbinYue |
| Kategori | Legal |
| Stjerner | 42 |
| Kilde | https://huggingface.co/ShengbinYue/DISC-LawLLM |
| Protocols | huggingface_api |
Lovgivningsmæssig overholdelse
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 96/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Populære alternativer i legal
What Is Disc Lawllm?
Disc Lawllm is a software tool in the legal category: DISC-LawLLM is an LLM-based automation tool for legal professionals.. It has 42 GitHub stars. Nerq Trust Score: 57/100 (D).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including sikkerhed vulnerabilities, vedligeholdelse activity, license overholdelse, and fællesskabsadoption.
How Nerq Assesses Disc Lawllm's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensioner. Here is how Disc Lawllm performs in each:
- Vedligeholdelse (0/100): Disc Lawllm is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (0/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API dokumentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (96/100): Disc Lawllm is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Baseret på GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 57.0/100 (D) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.
Who Should Use Disc Lawllm?
Disc Lawllm is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with legal tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Disc Lawllm is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its sikkerhed posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.
How to Verify Disc Lawllm's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Gennemgå repository sikkerhed policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active vedligeholdelse.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Disc Lawllm's dependency tree. - Anmeldelse permissions — Understand what access Disc Lawllm requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Disc Lawllm in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=DISC-LawLLM - Gennemgå license — Confirm that Disc Lawllm's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses sikkerhed concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Disc Lawllm
When evaluating whether Disc Lawllm is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Disc Lawllm processes, stores, and transmits your data. Gennemgå tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Disc Lawllm's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher sikkerhed risk.
Regularly check for updates to Disc Lawllm. Sikkerhed patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Disc Lawllm connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Disc Lawllm's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Disc Lawllm in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Disc Lawllm and the EU AI Act
Disc Lawllm is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's overholdelse assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal overholdelse.
Best Practices for Using Disc Lawllm Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Disc Lawllm while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Disc Lawllm is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and overholdelse with your sikkerhed policies.
Ensure Disc Lawllm and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from sikkerhed patches.
Grant Disc Lawllm only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Disc Lawllm's sikkerhed advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Disc Lawllm is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Disc Lawllm?
Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Disc Lawllm in these scenarios:
- Production environments handling sensitive customer data
- Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) without additional overholdelse review
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
For each scenario, evaluate whether Disc Lawllm's trust score of 57.0/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual sikkerhed assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.
How Disc Lawllm Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among legal tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Disc Lawllm's score of 57.0/100 is near the category average of 62/100.
This places Disc Lawllm in line with the typical legal tool tool. It meets baseline expectations but does not distinguish itself from peers on trust metrics.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderat in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Disc Lawllm and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or vedligeholdelse patterns change, Disc Lawllm's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to sikkerhed and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced vedligeholdelse, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Disc Lawllm's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=DISC-LawLLM&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — sikkerhed, vedligeholdelse, dokumentation, overholdelse, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Disc Lawllm are strengthening or weakening over time.
Disc Lawllm vs Alternativer
In the legal category, Disc Lawllm scores 57.0/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Disc Lawllm vs PDR_AI_v2 — Trust Score: 69.8/100
- Disc Lawllm vs ai-legal-overholdelse-assistant — Trust Score: 67.5/100
- Disc Lawllm vs lawglance — Trust Score: 69.9/100
Vigtigste pointer
- Disc Lawllm has a Trust Score of 57.0/100 (D) and is not yet Nerq Verified.
- Disc Lawllm shows moderat trust signals. Conduct thorough due diligence before deploying to production environments.
- Among legal tools, Disc Lawllm scores near the category average of 62/100, suggesting room for improvement relative to peers.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Detaljeret scoreanalyse
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Vedligeholdelse | 0/100 |
| Popularitet | 0/100 |
Baseret på 2 dimensioner. Data from flere offentlige kilder herunder pakkeregistre, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev og OpenSSF Scorecard.
Hvilke data indsamler Disc Lawllm?
Privatliv assessment for Disc Lawllm is not yet available. See our methodology for how Nerq measures privacy, or the public privacy review for any community-contributed notes.
Er Disc Lawllm sikker?
Sikkerhed score: under vurdering. Review sikkerhed practices and consider alternatives with higher sikkerhed scores for sensitive use cases.
Nerq overvåger denne enhed mod NVD, OSV.dev og registrespecifikke sårbarhedsdatabaser til løbende sikkerhedsvurdering.
Fuld analyse: Disc Lawllm sikkerhedsrapport
Sådan beregnede vi denne score
Disc Lawllm's trust score of 57.0/100 (D) beregnes ud fra flere offentlige kilder herunder pakkeregistre, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev og OpenSSF Scorecard. Scoren afspejler 2 uafhængige dimensioner: vedligeholdelse (0/100), popularitet (0/100). Hver dimension vægtes ens for at producere den samlede tillidsscore.
Nerq analyserer over 7,5 millioner enheder i 26 registre med samme metodik, hvilket muliggør direkte sammenligning mellem enheder. Scorer opdateres løbende, efterhånden som nye data bliver tilgængelige.
Denne side blev sidst gennemgået den May 21, 2026. Dataversion: 1.0.
Ofte stillede spørgsmål
Er Disc Lawllm sikker?
Hvad er Disc Lawllms tillidsscore?
Hvad er sikrere alternativer til Disc Lawllm?
Hvor ofte opdateres Disc Lawllms sikkerhedsscore?
Kan jeg bruge Disc Lawllm i et reguleret miljø?
Se også
Disclaimer: Nerqs tillidsscorer er automatiserede vurderinger baseret på offentligt tilgængelige signaler. De udgør ikke anbefalinger eller garantier. Foretag altid din egen verificering.