Er The Quorum Openclaw sikker?
The Quorum Openclaw — Nerq Trust Score 61.9/100 (Karakter C). Score baseret på 5 independent trust signals.
The Quorum Openclaw er en software tool med en Nerq Tillidsscore på 61.9/100 (C), based on 5 uafhængige datadimensioner. Sikkerhed: 0/100. Vedligeholdelse: 1/100. Popularitet: 0/100. Data hentet fra flere offentlige kilder herunder pakkeregistre, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev og OpenSSF Scorecard. Sidst opdateret: n/a. Maskinlæsbare data (JSON).
Er The Quorum Openclaw sikker?
Tillidsscore detaljer — The Quorum Openclaw has a Nerq Trust Score of 61.9/100 (C). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.
Hvad er The Quorum Openclaws tillidsscore?
The Quorum Openclaw har en Nerq Trust Score på 61.9/100 med karakteren C. Denne score er baseret på 5 uafhængigt målte dimensioner, herunder sikkerhed, vedligeholdelse og community-adoption.
Hvad er de vigtigste sikkerhedsresultater for The Quorum Openclaw?
The Quorum Openclaws stærkeste signal er overholdelse på 96/100. Ingen kendte sårbarheder er fundet.
Hvad er The Quorum Openclaw og hvem vedligeholder det?
| Udvikler | techman44 |
| Kategori | Coding |
| Kilde | https://github.com/techman44/the-quorum-openclaw |
| Frameworks | ollama |
Lovgivningsmæssig overholdelse
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 96/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Populære alternativer i coding
What Is The Quorum Openclaw?
The Quorum Openclaw is a software tool in the coding category: AI conscience agents with persistent memory for OpenClaw. Nerq Trust Score: 62/100 (C).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including sikkerhed vulnerabilities, vedligeholdelse activity, license overholdelse, and fællesskabsadoption.
How Nerq Assesses The Quorum Openclaw's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensioner. Here is how The Quorum Openclaw performs in each:
- Sikkerhed (0/100): The Quorum Openclaw's sikkerhed posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, sikkerhed policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Vedligeholdelse (1/100): The Quorum Openclaw is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API dokumentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (96/100): The Quorum Openclaw is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Baseret på GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 61.9/100 (C) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.
Who Typically Evaluates The Quorum Openclaw?
The Quorum Openclaw is commonly evaluated by:
- Developers and teams working with coding tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
How to read the signals: The Quorum Openclaw's measured signals (sikkerhed 0/100, vedligeholdelse 1/100, dokumentation 1/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.
How to Verify The Quorum Openclaw's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Gennemgå repository's sikkerhed policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active vedligeholdelse.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in The Quorum Openclaw's dependency tree. - Anmeldelse permissions — Understand what access The Quorum Openclaw requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run The Quorum Openclaw in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=the-quorum-openclaw - Gennemgå license — Confirm that The Quorum Openclaw's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses sikkerhed concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with The Quorum Openclaw
When evaluating whether The Quorum Openclaw is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how The Quorum Openclaw processes, stores, and transmits your data. Gennemgå tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check The Quorum Openclaw's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher sikkerhed risk.
Regularly check for updates to The Quorum Openclaw. Sikkerhed patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If The Quorum Openclaw connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that The Quorum Openclaw's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using The Quorum Openclaw in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
The Quorum Openclaw and the EU AI Act
The Quorum Openclaw is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's overholdelse assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal overholdelse.
Best Practices for Using The Quorum Openclaw Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from The Quorum Openclaw while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how The Quorum Openclaw is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and overholdelse with your sikkerhed policies.
Ensure The Quorum Openclaw and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from sikkerhed patches.
Grant The Quorum Openclaw only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to The Quorum Openclaw's sikkerhed advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how The Quorum Openclaw is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
Situations That Warrant Independent Review of The Quorum Openclaw
Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate The Quorum Openclaw's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:
- Environments handling sensitive or regulated data (healthcare, finance, government)
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
- Deployments with strict regulatory requirements that must be independently validated
For each situation, compare The Quorum Openclaw's measured trust score of 61.9/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether The Quorum Openclaw is suitable for any particular use.
How The Quorum Openclaw Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among coding tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. The Quorum Openclaw's score of 61.9/100 is near the category average of 62/100.
This places The Quorum Openclaw in line with the typical coding tool tool. It meets baseline expectations but does not distinguish itself from peers on trust metrics.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderat in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors The Quorum Openclaw and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or vedligeholdelse patterns change, The Quorum Openclaw's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to sikkerhed and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced vedligeholdelse, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track The Quorum Openclaw's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=the-quorum-openclaw&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — sikkerhed, vedligeholdelse, dokumentation, overholdelse, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of The Quorum Openclaw are strengthening or weakening over time.
The Quorum Openclaw vs Alternativer
In the coding category, The Quorum Openclaw scores 61.9/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- The Quorum Openclaw vs AutoGPT — Trust Score: 65.3/100
- The Quorum Openclaw vs ollama — Trust Score: 64.4/100
- The Quorum Openclaw vs langchain — Trust Score: 77.0/100
Vigtigste pointer
- The Quorum Openclaw has a measured Nerq Trust Score of 61.9/100 (C) — a composite of independent signals, not a suitability judgment.
- Among coding tools, The Quorum Openclaw scores near the category average of 62/100 (a positional measurement relative to peers).
- The individual signals — sikkerhed, vedligeholdelse, dokumentation, overholdelse, community — are shown above. Weigh them against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via Nerq's Preflight API.
Ofte stillede spørgsmål
Er The Quorum Openclaw sikker?
Hvad er The Quorum Openclaws tillidsscore?
Hvad er sikrere alternativer til The Quorum Openclaw?
Hvor ofte opdateres The Quorum Openclaws sikkerhedsscore?
Kan jeg bruge The Quorum Openclaw i et reguleret miljø?
Se også
Disclaimer: Nerqs tillidsscorer er automatiserede vurderinger baseret på offentligt tilgængelige signaler. De udgør ikke anbefalinger eller garantier. Foretag altid din egen verificering.