Ist Openclaw Docker sicher?
Openclaw Docker — Nerq Trust Score 69.1/100 (Note C). Basierend auf der Analyse von 5 Vertrauensdimensionen wird es als generell sicher, aber mit einigen Bedenken eingestuft. Zuletzt aktualisiert: 2026-04-23.
Verwende Openclaw Docker mit Vorsicht. Openclaw Docker ist ein software tool mit einem Nerq-Vertrauenswert von 69.1/100 (C), basierend auf 5 unabhängigen Datendimensionen. Unter der Nerq-Vertrauensschwelle Sicherheit: 1/100. Wartung: 1/100. Beliebtheit: 0/100. Daten von mehreren öffentlichen Quellen einschließlich Paketregistern, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev und OpenSSF Scorecard. Zuletzt aktualisiert: 2026-04-23. Maschinenlesbare Daten (JSON).
Ist Openclaw Docker sicher?
CAUTION — Openclaw Docker has a Nerq Trust Score of 69.1/100 (C). Es hat moderat Vertrauenssignale, zeigt aber einige Problembereiche that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review Sicherheit and Wartung signals before production deployment.
Was ist die Vertrauensbewertung von Openclaw Docker?
Openclaw Docker hat eine Nerq-Vertrauensbewertung von 69.1/100 und erhält die Note C. Diese Bewertung basiert auf 5 unabhängig gemessenen Dimensionen.
Was sind die wichtigsten Sicherheitsergebnisse für Openclaw Docker?
Das stärkste Signal von Openclaw Docker ist konformität mit 84/100. Es wurden keine bekannten Schwachstellen erkannt. Hat die Nerq-Vertrauensschwelle von 70+ noch nicht erreicht.
Was ist Openclaw Docker und wer pflegt es?
| Autor | phioranex |
| Kategorie | Coding |
| Sterne | 269 |
| Quelle | https://github.com/phioranex/openclaw-docker |
| Frameworks | openai · anthropic |
| Protocols | rest |
Regulatorische Konformität
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 84/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Beliebte Alternativen in coding
What Is Openclaw Docker?
Openclaw Docker is a software tool in the coding category: Runs an AI assistant in seconds via a Docker image.. It has 269 GitHub-Sternen. Nerq Trust Score: 69/100 (C).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including Sicherheit vulnerabilities, Wartung activity, license Konformität, and Community-Akzeptanz.
How Nerq Assesses Openclaw Docker's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five Dimensionen. Here is how Openclaw Docker performs in each:
- Sicherheit (1/100): Openclaw Docker's Sicherheit posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, Sicherheit policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Wartung (1/100): Openclaw Docker is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API Dokumentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (84/100): Openclaw Docker is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Basierend auf GitHub-Sternen, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 69.1/100 (C) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.
Who Should Use Openclaw Docker?
Openclaw Docker is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with coding tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Openclaw Docker is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its Sicherheit posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.
How to Verify Openclaw Docker's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Überprüfen Sie das/die repository's Sicherheit policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active Wartung.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Openclaw Docker's dependency tree. - Bewertung permissions — Understand what access Openclaw Docker requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Openclaw Docker in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=openclaw-docker - Überprüfen Sie das/die license — Confirm that Openclaw Docker's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses Sicherheit concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Openclaw Docker
When evaluating whether Openclaw Docker is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Openclaw Docker processes, stores, and transmits your data. Überprüfen Sie das/die tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Openclaw Docker's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher Sicherheit risk.
Regularly check for updates to Openclaw Docker. Sicherheit patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Openclaw Docker connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Openclaw Docker's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Openclaw Docker in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Openclaw Docker and the EU AI Act
Openclaw Docker is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's Konformität assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal Konformität.
Best Practices for Using Openclaw Docker Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Openclaw Docker while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Openclaw Docker is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and Konformität with your Sicherheit policies.
Ensure Openclaw Docker and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from Sicherheit patches.
Grant Openclaw Docker only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Openclaw Docker's Sicherheit advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Openclaw Docker is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Openclaw Docker?
Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Openclaw Docker in these scenarios:
- Production environments handling sensitive customer data
- Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) without additional Konformität review
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
For each scenario, evaluate whether Openclaw Docker's trust score of 69.1/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual Sicherheit assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.
How Openclaw Docker Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among coding tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Openclaw Docker's score of 69.1/100 is above the category average of 62/100.
This positions Openclaw Docker favorably among coding tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust Dimensionen.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderat in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Openclaw Docker and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or Wartung patterns change, Openclaw Docker's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to Sicherheit and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced Wartung, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Openclaw Docker's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=openclaw-docker&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — Sicherheit, Wartung, Dokumentation, Konformität, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Openclaw Docker are strengthening or weakening over time.
Openclaw Docker vs Alternativen
In the coding category, Openclaw Docker scores 69.1/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Openclaw Docker vs AutoGPT — Trust Score: 74.7/100
- Openclaw Docker vs ollama — Trust Score: 73.8/100
- Openclaw Docker vs langchain — Trust Score: 71.3/100
Wichtigste Punkte
- Openclaw Docker has a Trust Score of 69.1/100 (C) and is not yet Nerq Verified.
- Openclaw Docker shows moderat trust signals. Conduct thorough due diligence before deploying to production environments.
- Among coding tools, Openclaw Docker scores above the category average of 62/100, demonstrating above-average reliability.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Detaillierte Bewertungsanalyse
| Dimension | Bewertung |
|---|---|
| Sicherheit | 1/100 |
| Wartung | 1/100 |
| Beliebtheit | 0/100 |
Basierend auf 3 Dimensionen. Daten von mehreren öffentlichen Quellen einschließlich Paketregistern, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev und OpenSSF Scorecard.
Welche Daten erhebt Openclaw Docker?
Datenschutz assessment for Openclaw Docker is not yet available. See our methodology for how Nerq measures privacy, or the public privacy review for any community-contributed notes.
Ist Openclaw Docker sicher?
Sicherheitsbewertung: 1/100. Review Sicherheit practices and consider alternatives with higher Sicherheit scores for sensitive use cases.
Nerq überwacht diese Entität anhand von NVD, OSV.dev und registerspezifischen Schwachstellendatenbanken für die laufende Sicherheitsbewertung.
Vollständige Analyse: Openclaw Docker Sicherheitsbericht
Wie wir diese Bewertung berechnet haben
Openclaw Docker's trust score of 69.1/100 (C) wird berechnet aus mehreren öffentlichen Quellen einschließlich Paketregistern, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev und OpenSSF Scorecard. Die Bewertung spiegelt wider 3 unabhängige Dimensionen: Sicherheit (1/100), Wartung (1/100), Beliebtheit (0/100). Jede Dimension wird gleich gewichtet, um die zusammengesetzte Vertrauensbewertung zu erstellen.
Nerq analysiert über 7,5 Millionen Entitäten in 26 Registern mit derselben Methodik, die einen direkten Vergleich zwischen Entitäten ermöglicht. Bewertungen werden kontinuierlich aktualisiert, sobald neue Daten verfügbar sind.
Diese Seite wurde zuletzt überprüft am April 23, 2026. Datenversion: 1.0.
Vollständige Methodendokumentation · Maschinenlesbare Daten (JSON-API)
Häufig gestellte Fragen
Ist Openclaw Docker sicher?
Was ist die Vertrauensbewertung von Openclaw Docker?
Was sind sicherere Alternativen zu Openclaw Docker?
Wie oft wird die Sicherheitsbewertung von Openclaw Docker aktualisiert?
Kann ich Openclaw Docker in einer regulierten Umgebung verwenden?
Siehe auch
Disclaimer: Nerq-Vertrauensbewertungen sind automatisierte Bewertungen basierend auf öffentlich verfügbaren Signalen. Sie sind keine Empfehlungen oder Garantien. Führen Sie immer Ihre eigene Sorgfaltsprüfung durch.