Ist Open Claw Gate sicher?

Open Claw Gate — Nerq Trust Score 51.7/100 (Note D). Bewertung basierend auf 5 independent trust signals.

Open Claw Gate ist ein software tool mit einem Nerq-Vertrauenswert von 51.7/100 (D), basierend auf 5 unabhängigen Datendimensionen. Sicherheit: 0/100. Wartung: 1/100. Beliebtheit: 0/100. Daten von mehreren öffentlichen Quellen einschließlich Paketregistern, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev und OpenSSF Scorecard. Zuletzt aktualisiert: n/a. Maschinenlesbare Daten (JSON).

Ist Open Claw Gate sicher?

Vertrauensbewertung im Detail — Open Claw Gate has a Nerq Trust Score of 51.7/100 (D). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.

Sicherheitsanalyse → Open Claw Gate Datenschutzbericht →

Was ist die Vertrauensbewertung von Open Claw Gate?

Open Claw Gate hat eine Nerq-Vertrauensbewertung von 51.7/100 und erhält die Note D. Diese Bewertung basiert auf 5 unabhängig gemessenen Dimensionen.

Sicherheit
0
Konformität
96
Wartung
1
Dokumentation
1
Beliebtheit
0

Was sind die wichtigsten Sicherheitsergebnisse für Open Claw Gate?

Das stärkste Signal von Open Claw Gate ist konformität mit 96/100. Es wurden keine bekannten Schwachstellen erkannt.

⚠Sicherheitsbewertung: 0/100 (schwach)
⚠Wartung: 1/100 — geringe Wartungsaktivität
⚠Konformität: 96/100 — covers 49 of 52 jurisdictions
⚠Dokumentation: 1/100 — begrenzte Dokumentation
⚠Beliebtheit: 0/100 — Community-Akzeptanz

Was ist Open Claw Gate und wer pflegt es?

AutorKelberwitz
KategorieDevops
Quellehttps://github.com/Kelberwitz/Open-Claw-Gate
Frameworksanthropic
Protocolsrest

Regulatorische Konformität

EU AI Act Risk ClassMINIMAL
Compliance Score96/100
JurisdictionsAssessed across 52 jurisdictions

Beliebte Alternativen in devops

ansible/ansible
74.9/100 · B
github
FlowiseAI/Flowise
67.5/100 · C
github
shareAI-lab/learn-claude-code
72.1/100 · B
github
continuedev/continue
75.0/100 · B
github
wshobson/agents
79.3/100 · B
github

What Is Open Claw Gate?

Open Claw Gate is a DevOps tool: An SSH connection launcher for Windows with multi-instance management and OpenClaw tunnel support.. Nerq Trust Score: 52/100 (D).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including Sicherheit vulnerabilities, Wartung activity, license Konformität, and Community-Akzeptanz.

How Nerq Assesses Open Claw Gate's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five Dimensionen. Here is how Open Claw Gate performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 51.7/100 (D) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.

Who Typically Evaluates Open Claw Gate?

Open Claw Gate is commonly evaluated by:

How to read the signals: Open Claw Gate's measured signals (Sicherheit 0/100, Wartung 1/100, Dokumentation 1/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.

How to Verify Open Claw Gate's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — Überprüfen Sie das/die repository's Sicherheit policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active Wartung.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Open Claw Gate's dependency tree.
  3. Bewertung permissions — Understand what access Open Claw Gate requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Open Claw Gate in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Open-Claw-Gate
  6. Überprüfen Sie das/die license — Confirm that Open Claw Gate's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses Sicherheit concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Open Claw Gate

When evaluating whether Open Claw Gate is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Open Claw Gate processes, stores, and transmits your data. Überprüfen Sie das/die tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency Sicherheit

Check Open Claw Gate's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher Sicherheit risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Open Claw Gate. Sicherheit patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Open Claw Gate connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP Konformität

Verify that Open Claw Gate's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Open Claw Gate in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Open Claw Gate and the EU AI Act

Open Claw Gate is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.

Nerq's Konformität assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal Konformität.

Best Practices for Using Open Claw Gate Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Open Claw Gate while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Open Claw Gate is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and Konformität with your Sicherheit policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Open Claw Gate and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from Sicherheit patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Open Claw Gate only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for Sicherheit advisories

Subscribe to Open Claw Gate's Sicherheit advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Open Claw Gate is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Open Claw Gate

Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Open Claw Gate's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:

For each situation, compare Open Claw Gate's measured trust score of 51.7/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Open Claw Gate is suitable for any particular use.

How Open Claw Gate Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among DevOps tools, the average Trust Score is 63/100. Open Claw Gate's score of 51.7/100 is below the category average of 63/100.

This suggests that Open Claw Gate trails behind many comparable DevOps tools. Organizations with strict Sicherheit requirements should evaluate whether higher-scoring alternatives better meet their needs.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderat in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Open Claw Gate and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or Wartung patterns change, Open Claw Gate's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to Sicherheit and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced Wartung, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Open Claw Gate's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Open-Claw-Gate&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — Sicherheit, Wartung, Dokumentation, Konformität, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Open Claw Gate are strengthening or weakening over time.

Open Claw Gate vs Alternativen

In the devops category, Open Claw Gate scores 51.7/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:

Wichtigste Punkte

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Ist Open Claw Gate sicher?
Open-Claw-Gate mit einem Nerq-Vertrauenswert von 51.7/100 (D). Stärkstes Signal: konformität (96/100). Bewertung basierend auf Sicherheit (0/100), Wartung (1/100), Beliebtheit (0/100), Dokumentation (1/100).
Was ist die Vertrauensbewertung von Open Claw Gate?
Open-Claw-Gate: 51.7/100 (D). Bewertung basierend auf Sicherheit (0/100), Wartung (1/100), Beliebtheit (0/100), Dokumentation (1/100). Compliance: 96/100. Bewertungen werden aktualisiert, wenn neue Daten verfügbar werden. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Open-Claw-Gate
Was sind sicherere Alternativen zu Open Claw Gate?
In der Kategorie Devops, higher-rated alternatives include ansible/ansible (75/100), FlowiseAI/Flowise (68/100), shareAI-lab/learn-claude-code (72/100). Open-Claw-Gate scores 51.7/100.
Wie oft wird die Sicherheitsbewertung von Open Claw Gate aktualisiert?
Nerq recomputes Open Claw Gate's trust score as new data becomes available. Current: 51.7/100 (D). API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Open-Claw-Gate
Kann ich Open Claw Gate in einer regulierten Umgebung verwenden?
Open Claw Gate: 51.7/100 (D). Compliance: 49 of 52 jurisdictions. EU AI Act compliant. Evaluate against your own regulatory requirements.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Siehe auch

Disclaimer: Nerq-Vertrauensbewertungen sind automatisierte Bewertungen basierend auf öffentlich verfügbaren Signalen. Sie sind keine Empfehlungen oder Garantien. Führen Sie immer Ihre eigene Sorgfaltsprüfung durch.

Wir verwenden Cookies für Analysen und Caching. Datenschutz