Auto Dev est-il sûr ?
Auto Dev — Nerq Trust Score 65.1/100 (Note B-). Sur la base de l'analyse de 5 dimensions de confiance, il est généralement sûr mais avec quelques préoccupations. Dernière mise à jour : 2026-04-30.
Utilisez Auto Dev avec précaution. Auto Dev est un software tool avec un Nerq Trust Score de 65.1/100 (B-), basé sur 5 dimensions de données indépendantes. En dessous du seuil vérifié Nerq Sécurité: 0/100. Maintenance: 0/100. Popularité: 0/100. Données de plusieurs sources publiques dont les registres de paquets, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev et OpenSSF Scorecard. Dernière mise à jour: 2026-04-30. Données lisibles par machine (JSON).
Auto Dev est-il sûr ?
CAUTION — Auto Dev has a Nerq Trust Score of 65.1/100 (B-). Il présente des signaux de confiance modérés mais montre certaines zones de préoccupation that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review sécurité and maintenance signals before production deployment.
Quel est le score de confiance de Auto Dev ?
Auto Dev a un Score de Confiance Nerq de 65.1/100, obtenant la note B-. Ce score est basé sur 5 dimensions mesurées indépendamment.
Quels sont les résultats de sécurité clés pour Auto Dev ?
Le signal le plus fort de Auto Dev est conformité à 100/100. Aucune vulnérabilité connue n'a été détectée. N'a pas encore atteint le seuil vérifié Nerq de 70+.
Qu'est-ce que Auto Dev et qui le maintient ?
| Auteur | phodal |
| Catégorie | Ai Tool |
| Étoiles | 4,362 |
| Source | https://github.com/phodal/auto-dev |
| Frameworks | openai · anthropic · ollama |
| Protocols | mcp |
Conformité réglementaire
| EU AI Act Risk Class | Not assessed |
| Compliance Score | 100/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Auto Dev sur d'autres plateformes
Même développeur/entreprise dans d'autres registres :
What Is Auto Dev?
Auto Dev is a software tool in the AI tool category: 🧙AutoDev: the AI-native Multi-Agent development platform built on Kotlin Multiplatform, covering all 7 phases of SDLC.. It has 4,362 GitHub stars. Nerq Trust Score: 65/100 (B-).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including sécurité vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license conformité, and adoption par la communauté.
How Nerq Assesses Auto Dev's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Auto Dev performs in each:
- Sécurité (0/100): Auto Dev's sécurité posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, sécurité policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Maintenance (0/100): Auto Dev is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (0/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API documentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (100/100): Auto Dev is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Basé sur GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 65.1/100 (B-) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.
Who Should Use Auto Dev?
Auto Dev is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with AI tool tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Auto Dev is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its sécurité posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.
How to Verify Auto Dev's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Examiner le/la repository's sécurité policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Auto Dev's dependency tree. - Avis permissions — Understand what access Auto Dev requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Auto Dev in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=phodal/auto-dev - Examiner le/la license — Confirm that Auto Dev's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses sécurité concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Auto Dev
When evaluating whether Auto Dev is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Auto Dev processes, stores, and transmits your data. Examiner le/la tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Auto Dev's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher sécurité risk.
Regularly check for updates to Auto Dev. Sécurité patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Auto Dev connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Auto Dev's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Auto Dev in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Best Practices for Using Auto Dev Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Auto Dev while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Auto Dev is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and conformité with your sécurité policies.
Ensure Auto Dev and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from sécurité patches.
Grant Auto Dev only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Auto Dev's sécurité advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Auto Dev is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Auto Dev?
Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Auto Dev in these scenarios:
- Production environments handling sensitive customer data
- Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) without additional conformité review
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
For each scenario, evaluate whether Auto Dev's trust score of 65.1/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual sécurité assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.
How Auto Dev Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among AI tool tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Auto Dev's score of 65.1/100 is above the category average of 62/100.
This positions Auto Dev favorably among AI tool tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimensions.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks modéré in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Auto Dev and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Auto Dev's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to sécurité and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Auto Dev's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=phodal/auto-dev&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — sécurité, maintenance, documentation, conformité, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Auto Dev are strengthening or weakening over time.
Points Essentiels
- Auto Dev has a Trust Score of 65.1/100 (B-) and is not yet Nerq Verified.
- Auto Dev shows modéré trust signals. Conduct thorough due diligence before deploying to production environments.
- Among AI tool tools, Auto Dev scores above the category average of 62/100, demonstrating above-average reliability.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Analyse détaillée du score
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Sécurité | 0/100 |
| Maintenance | 0/100 |
| Popularité | 0/100 |
Basé sur 3 dimensions. Data from plusieurs sources publiques dont les registres de paquets, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev et OpenSSF Scorecard.
Quelles données Auto Dev collecte-t-il ?
Confidentialité assessment for Auto Dev is not yet available. See our methodology for how Nerq measures privacy, or the public privacy review for any community-contributed notes.
Auto Dev est-il sécurisé ?
Sécurité score: 0/100. Review sécurité practices and consider alternatives with higher sécurité scores for sensitive use cases.
Nerq surveille cette entité par rapport à NVD, OSV.dev et aux bases de données de vulnérabilités spécifiques aux registres pour une évaluation de sécurité continue.
Analyse complète : Rapport de sécurité de Auto Dev
Auto Dev sur d'autres plateformes
Même développeur/entreprise dans d'autres registres :
Comment nous avons calculé ce score
Auto Dev's trust score of 65.1/100 (B-) est calculé à partir de plusieurs sources publiques dont les registres de paquets, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev et OpenSSF Scorecard. Le score reflète 3 dimensions indépendantes: sécurité (0/100), maintenance (0/100), popularité (0/100). Chaque dimension est pondérée de manière égale pour produire le score de confiance composite.
Nerq analyse plus de 7,5 millions d'entités dans 26 registres en utilisant la même méthodologie, permettant une comparaison directe entre entités. Les scores sont mis à jour en continu dès que de nouvelles données sont disponibles.
Cette page a été révisée pour la dernière fois le April 30, 2026. Version des données: 1.0.
Documentation complète de la méthodologie · Données lisibles par machine (API JSON)
Questions fréquentes
Auto Dev est-il sûr ?
Quel est le score de confiance de Auto Dev ?
Quelles sont les alternatives plus sûres à Auto Dev ?
À quelle fréquence le score de sécurité de Auto Dev est-il mis à jour ?
Puis-je utiliser Auto Dev dans un environnement réglementé ?
Voir aussi
Disclaimer: Les scores de confiance Nerq sont des évaluations automatisées basées sur des signaux publiquement disponibles. Ce ne sont pas des recommandations ou des garanties. Effectuez toujours votre propre vérification.