Magic School Agent est-il sûr ?

Magic School Agent — Nerq Trust Score 51.6/100 (Note D). Score basé sur 5 independent trust signals.

Magic School Agent est un software tool avec un Nerq Trust Score de 51.6/100 (D), basé sur 5 dimensions de données indépendantes. Sécurité: 0/100. Maintenance: 1/100. Popularité: 0/100. Données de plusieurs sources publiques dont les registres de paquets, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev et OpenSSF Scorecard. Dernière mise à jour: n/a. Données lisibles par machine (JSON).

Magic School Agent est-il sûr ?

Détail du score de confiance — Magic School Agent has a Nerq Trust Score of 51.6/100 (D). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.

Analyse de Sécurité → Rapport de confidentialité de Magic School Agent →

Quel est le score de confiance de Magic School Agent ?

Magic School Agent a un Score de Confiance Nerq de 51.6/100, obtenant la note D. Ce score est basé sur 5 dimensions mesurées indépendamment.

Sécurité
0
Conformité
79
Maintenance
1
Documentation
0
Popularité
0

Quels sont les résultats de sécurité clés pour Magic School Agent ?

Le signal le plus fort de Magic School Agent est conformité à 79/100. Aucune vulnérabilité connue n'a été détectée.

⚠Score de sécurité: 0/100 (faible)
⚠Maintenance: 1/100 — faible activité de maintenance
⚠Conformité: 79/100 — covers 41 of 52 jurisdictions
⚠Documentation: 0/100 — documentation limitée
⚠Popularité: 0/100 — adoption communautaire

Qu'est-ce que Magic School Agent et qui le maintient ?

AuteurPanb-KG
CatégorieEducation
Sourcehttps://github.com/Panb-KG/magic-school-agent

Conformité réglementaire

EU AI Act Risk ClassHIGH
Compliance Score79/100
JurisdictionsAssessed across 52 jurisdictions

Alternatives populaires dans education

JushBJJ/Mr.-Ranedeer-AI-Tutor
59.4/100 · D
github
datawhalechina/hello-agents
70.1/100 · B
github
camel-ai/owl
60.9/100 · C
github
microsoft/mcp-for-beginners
67.8/100 · C
github
virgili0/Virgilio
59.4/100 · D
github

What Is Magic School Agent?

Magic School Agent is a software tool in the education category: AI assistant for students. Nerq Trust Score: 52/100 (D).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including sécurité vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license conformité, and adoption par la communauté.

How Nerq Assesses Magic School Agent's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Magic School Agent performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 51.6/100 (D) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.

Who Typically Evaluates Magic School Agent?

Magic School Agent is commonly evaluated by:

How to read the signals: Magic School Agent's measured signals (sécurité 0/100, maintenance 1/100, documentation 0/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.

How to Verify Magic School Agent's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — Examiner le/la repository's sécurité policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Magic School Agent's dependency tree.
  3. Avis permissions — Understand what access Magic School Agent requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Magic School Agent in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=magic-school-agent
  6. Examiner le/la license — Confirm that Magic School Agent's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses sécurité concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Magic School Agent

When evaluating whether Magic School Agent is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Magic School Agent processes, stores, and transmits your data. Examiner le/la tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency sécurité

Check Magic School Agent's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher sécurité risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Magic School Agent. Sécurité patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Magic School Agent connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP conformité

Verify that Magic School Agent's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Magic School Agent in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Magic School Agent and the EU AI Act

Magic School Agent is classified as High Risk under the EU AI Act. This imposes significant requirements including risk management systems, data governance, technical documentation, and human oversight.

Nerq's conformité assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal conformité.

Best Practices for Using Magic School Agent Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Magic School Agent while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Magic School Agent is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and conformité with your sécurité policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Magic School Agent and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from sécurité patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Magic School Agent only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for sécurité advisories

Subscribe to Magic School Agent's sécurité advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Magic School Agent is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Magic School Agent

Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Magic School Agent's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:

For each situation, compare Magic School Agent's measured trust score of 51.6/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Magic School Agent is suitable for any particular use.

How Magic School Agent Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among education tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Magic School Agent's score of 51.6/100 is below the category average of 62/100.

This suggests that Magic School Agent trails behind many comparable education tools. Organizations with strict sécurité requirements should evaluate whether higher-scoring alternatives better meet their needs.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks modéré in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Magic School Agent and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Magic School Agent's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to sécurité and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Magic School Agent's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=magic-school-agent&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — sécurité, maintenance, documentation, conformité, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Magic School Agent are strengthening or weakening over time.

Magic School Agent vs Alternatives

In the education category, Magic School Agent scores 51.6/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:

Points Essentiels

Questions fréquentes

Magic School Agent est-il sûr ?
magic-school-agent avec un Nerq Trust Score de 51.6/100 (D). Signal le plus fort : conformité (79/100). Score basé sur Sécurité (0/100), Maintenance (1/100), Popularité (0/100), Documentation (0/100).
Quel est le score de confiance de Magic School Agent ?
magic-school-agent: 51.6/100 (D). Score basé sur Sécurité (0/100), Maintenance (1/100), Popularité (0/100), Documentation (0/100). Compliance: 79/100. Les scores sont mis à jour lorsque de nouvelles données sont disponibles. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=magic-school-agent
Quelles sont les alternatives plus sûres à Magic School Agent ?
Dans la catégorie Education, higher-rated alternatives include JushBJJ/Mr.-Ranedeer-AI-Tutor (59/100), datawhalechina/hello-agents (70/100), camel-ai/owl (61/100). magic-school-agent scores 51.6/100.
À quelle fréquence le score de sécurité de Magic School Agent est-il mis à jour ?
Nerq recomputes Magic School Agent's trust score as new data becomes available. Current: 51.6/100 (D). API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=magic-school-agent
Puis-je utiliser Magic School Agent dans un environnement réglementé ?
Magic School Agent: 51.6/100 (D). Compliance: 41 of 52 jurisdictions. Evaluate against your own regulatory requirements.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Voir aussi

Disclaimer: Les scores de confiance Nerq sont des évaluations automatisées basées sur des signaux publiquement disponibles. Ce ne sont pas des recommandations ou des garanties. Effectuez toujours votre propre vérification.

Nous utilisons des cookies pour l'analyse et le cache. Confidentialité