Apakah Coordination Intelligence Aman?

Coordination Intelligence — Nerq Trust Score 64.0/100 (Nilai C). Skor berdasarkan 5 independent trust signals.

Coordination Intelligence adalah software tool dengan Skor Kepercayaan Nerq sebesar 64.0/100 (C), based on 5 dimensi data independen. Keamanan: 0/100. Pemeliharaan: 1/100. Popularitas: 0/100. Data bersumber dari berbagai sumber publik termasuk registri paket, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, dan OpenSSF Scorecard. Terakhir diperbarui: n/a. Data yang dapat dibaca mesin (JSON).

Apakah Coordination Intelligence Aman?

Rincian Skor Kepercayaan — Coordination Intelligence has a Nerq Trust Score of 64.0/100 (C). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.

Analisis Keamanan → Laporan Privasi Coordination Intelligence →

Berapa skor kepercayaan Coordination Intelligence?

Coordination Intelligence memiliki Skor Kepercayaan Nerq 64.0/100 dengan nilai C. Skor ini didasarkan pada 5 dimensi yang diukur secara independen.

Keamanan
0
Kepatuhan
100
Pemeliharaan
1
Dokumentasi
1
Popularitas
0

Apa temuan keamanan utama untuk Coordination Intelligence?

Sinyal terkuat Coordination Intelligence adalah kepatuhan pada 100/100. Tidak ada kerentanan yang diketahui terdeteksi.

⚠Skor keamanan: 0/100 (lemah)
⚠Pemeliharaan: 1/100 — aktivitas pemeliharaan rendah
⚠Kepatuhan: 100/100 — covers 52 of 52 jurisdictions
⚠Dokumentasi: 1/100 — dokumentasi terbatas
⚠Popularitas: 0/100 — adopsi komunitas

Apa itu Coordination Intelligence dan siapa yang mengelolanya?

Pembuatpavelsukhachev
KategoriManagement
Sumberhttps://github.com/pavelsukhachev/coordination-intelligence
Protocolsrest

Kepatuhan Regulasi

EU AI Act Risk ClassMINIMAL
Compliance Score100/100
JurisdictionsAssessed across 52 jurisdictions

Alternatif Populer di management

Clerk
47.7/100 · D
pulsemcp
agent-session-management
54.1/100 · D
github
pm-ai-concierge
53.2/100 · D
github
ai-toolkit
51.5/100 · D
github
control-tower
49.1/100 · D
github

What Is Coordination Intelligence?

Coordination Intelligence is a software tool in the management category: An autonomous agent framework for resolving organizational blockers.. Nerq Trust Score: 64/100 (C).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including keamanan vulnerabilities, pemeliharaan activity, license kepatuhan, and adopsi komunitas.

How Nerq Assesses Coordination Intelligence's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensi. Here is how Coordination Intelligence performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 64.0/100 (C) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.

Who Typically Evaluates Coordination Intelligence?

Coordination Intelligence is commonly evaluated by:

How to read the signals: Coordination Intelligence's measured signals (keamanan 0/100, pemeliharaan 1/100, dokumentasi 1/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.

How to Verify Coordination Intelligence's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — Tinjau repository's keamanan policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active pemeliharaan.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Coordination Intelligence's dependency tree.
  3. Ulasan permissions — Understand what access Coordination Intelligence requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Coordination Intelligence in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=coordination-intelligence
  6. Tinjau license — Confirm that Coordination Intelligence's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses keamanan concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Coordination Intelligence

When evaluating whether Coordination Intelligence is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Coordination Intelligence processes, stores, and transmits your data. Tinjau tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency keamanan

Check Coordination Intelligence's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher keamanan risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Coordination Intelligence. Keamanan patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Coordination Intelligence connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP kepatuhan

Verify that Coordination Intelligence's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Coordination Intelligence in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Coordination Intelligence and the EU AI Act

Coordination Intelligence is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.

Nerq's kepatuhan assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal kepatuhan.

Best Practices for Using Coordination Intelligence Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Coordination Intelligence while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Coordination Intelligence is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and kepatuhan with your keamanan policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Coordination Intelligence and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from keamanan patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Coordination Intelligence only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for keamanan advisories

Subscribe to Coordination Intelligence's keamanan advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Coordination Intelligence is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Coordination Intelligence

Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Coordination Intelligence's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:

For each situation, compare Coordination Intelligence's measured trust score of 64.0/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Coordination Intelligence is suitable for any particular use.

How Coordination Intelligence Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among management tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Coordination Intelligence's score of 64.0/100 is above the category average of 62/100.

This positions Coordination Intelligence favorably among management tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimensi.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks sedang in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Coordination Intelligence and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or pemeliharaan patterns change, Coordination Intelligence's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to keamanan and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced pemeliharaan, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Coordination Intelligence's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=coordination-intelligence&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — keamanan, pemeliharaan, dokumentasi, kepatuhan, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Coordination Intelligence are strengthening or weakening over time.

Coordination Intelligence vs Alternatif

In the management category, Coordination Intelligence scores 64.0/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:

Kesimpulan Utama

Pertanyaan yang Sering Diajukan

Apakah Coordination Intelligence Aman?
coordination-intelligence dengan Skor Kepercayaan Nerq sebesar 64.0/100 (C). Sinyal terkuat: kepatuhan (100/100). Skor berdasarkan Keamanan (0/100), Pemeliharaan (1/100), Popularitas (0/100), Dokumentasi (1/100).
Berapa skor kepercayaan Coordination Intelligence?
coordination-intelligence: 64.0/100 (C). Skor berdasarkan Keamanan (0/100), Pemeliharaan (1/100), Popularitas (0/100), Dokumentasi (1/100). Compliance: 100/100. Skor diperbarui saat data baru tersedia. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=coordination-intelligence
Apa alternatif yang lebih aman dari Coordination Intelligence?
Dalam kategori Management, higher-rated alternatives include Clerk (48/100), agent-session-management (54/100), pm-ai-concierge (53/100). coordination-intelligence scores 64.0/100.
Seberapa sering skor keamanan Coordination Intelligence diperbarui?
Nerq recomputes Coordination Intelligence's trust score as new data becomes available. Current: 64.0/100 (C). API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=coordination-intelligence
Bisakah saya menggunakan Coordination Intelligence di lingkungan yang diatur?
Coordination Intelligence: 64.0/100 (C). Compliance: 52 of 52 jurisdictions. EU AI Act compliant. Evaluate against your own regulatory requirements.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Lihat juga

Disclaimer: Skor kepercayaan Nerq adalah penilaian otomatis berdasarkan sinyal yang tersedia secara publik. Ini bukan rekomendasi atau jaminan. Selalu lakukan verifikasi mandiri Anda sendiri.

Kami menggunakan cookie untuk analitik dan caching. Privasi