Apakah Docker Gc Aman?
Docker Gc — Nerq Trust Score 63.8/100 (Nilai C). Berdasarkan analisis 5 dimensi kepercayaan, dianggap umumnya aman tetapi memiliki beberapa kekhawatiran. Terakhir diperbarui: 2026-04-06.
Gunakan Docker Gc dengan hati-hati. Docker Gc adalah software tool dengan Skor Kepercayaan Nerq sebesar 63.8/100 (C), based on 5 dimensi data independen. Di bawah ambang batas terverifikasi Nerq Keamanan: 0/100. Pemeliharaan: 0/100. Popularitas: 0/100. Data bersumber dari berbagai sumber publik termasuk registri paket, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, dan OpenSSF Scorecard. Terakhir diperbarui: 2026-04-06. Data yang dapat dibaca mesin (JSON).
Apakah Docker Gc Aman?
CAUTION — Docker Gc has a Nerq Trust Score of 63.8/100 (C). Memiliki sinyal kepercayaan sedang tetapi menunjukkan beberapa area perhatian that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review keamanan and pemeliharaan signals before production deployment.
Berapa skor kepercayaan Docker Gc?
Docker Gc memiliki Skor Kepercayaan Nerq 63.8/100 dengan nilai C. Skor ini didasarkan pada 5 dimensi yang diukur secara independen.
Apa temuan keamanan utama untuk Docker Gc?
Sinyal terkuat Docker Gc adalah kepatuhan pada 100/100. Tidak ada kerentanan yang diketahui terdeteksi. Belum mencapai ambang verifikasi Nerq 70+.
Apa itu Docker Gc dan siapa yang mengelolanya?
| Pembuat | circleci |
| Kategori | Devops |
| Bintang | 6 |
| Sumber | https://hub.docker.com/r/circleci/docker-gc |
| Protocols | docker |
Kepatuhan Regulasi
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 100/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Alternatif Populer di devops
Docker Gc di Platform Lain
Developer/perusahaan yang sama di registry lain:
What Is Docker Gc?
Docker Gc is a DevOps tool: Agent for performing Docker image cache LRU garbage collection.. It has 6 GitHub stars. Nerq Trust Score: 64/100 (C).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including keamanan vulnerabilities, pemeliharaan activity, license kepatuhan, and adopsi komunitas.
How Nerq Assesses Docker Gc's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensi. Here is how Docker Gc performs in each:
- Keamanan (0/100): Docker Gc's keamanan posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, keamanan policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Pemeliharaan (0/100): Docker Gc is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (0/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API dokumentasi, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (100/100): Docker Gc is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Berdasarkan GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 63.8/100 (C) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.
Who Should Use Docker Gc?
Docker Gc is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with devops tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Docker Gc is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its keamanan posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.
How to Verify Docker Gc's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Tinjau repository keamanan policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active pemeliharaan.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Docker Gc's dependency tree. - Ulasan permissions — Understand what access Docker Gc requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Docker Gc in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=docker-gc - Tinjau license — Confirm that Docker Gc's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses keamanan concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Docker Gc
When evaluating whether Docker Gc is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Docker Gc processes, stores, and transmits your data. Tinjau tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Docker Gc's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher keamanan risk.
Regularly check for updates to Docker Gc. Keamanan patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Docker Gc connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Docker Gc's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Docker Gc in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Docker Gc and the EU AI Act
Docker Gc is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's kepatuhan assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal kepatuhan.
Best Practices for Using Docker Gc Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Docker Gc while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Docker Gc is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and kepatuhan with your keamanan policies.
Ensure Docker Gc and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from keamanan patches.
Grant Docker Gc only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Docker Gc's keamanan advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Docker Gc is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Docker Gc?
Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Docker Gc in these scenarios:
- Production environments handling sensitive customer data
- Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) without additional kepatuhan review
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
For each scenario, evaluate whether Docker Gc's trust score of 63.8/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual keamanan assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.
How Docker Gc Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among DevOps tools, the average Trust Score is 63/100. Docker Gc's score of 63.8/100 is above the category average of 63/100.
This positions Docker Gc favorably among DevOps tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimensi.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks sedang in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Docker Gc and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or pemeliharaan patterns change, Docker Gc's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to keamanan and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced pemeliharaan, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Docker Gc's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=docker-gc&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — keamanan, pemeliharaan, dokumentasi, kepatuhan, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Docker Gc are strengthening or weakening over time.
Docker Gc vs Alternatif
In the devops category, Docker Gc scores 63.8/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Docker Gc vs ansible — Trust Score: 84.3/100
- Docker Gc vs Flowise — Trust Score: 76.9/100
- Docker Gc vs learn-claude-code — Trust Score: 81.5/100
Kesimpulan Utama
- Docker Gc has a Trust Score of 63.8/100 (C) and is not yet Nerq Verified.
- Docker Gc shows sedang trust signals. Conduct thorough due diligence before deploying to production environments.
- Among DevOps tools, Docker Gc scores above the category average of 63/100, demonstrating above-average reliability.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Pertanyaan yang Sering Diajukan
Apakah Docker Gc Aman?
Berapa skor kepercayaan Docker Gc?
What are safer alternatives to Docker Gc?
How often is Docker Gc's safety score updated?
Can I use Docker Gc in a regulated environment?
Lihat juga
Disclaimer: Skor kepercayaan Nerq adalah penilaian otomatis berdasarkan sinyal yang tersedia secara publik. Ini bukan rekomendasi atau jaminan. Selalu lakukan verifikasi mandiri Anda sendiri.