Is Analytic Wfm Safe?

Analytic Wfm — Nerq Trust Score 49.5/100 (D grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-03-20

Analytic Wfm is a Python package (peak detection algorithms) with a Nerq Trust Score of 49.5/100 (D), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-03-20 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 15/100. Data sourced from PyPI registry, GitHub repository, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-03-20. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Analytic Wfm safe?

Trust Score Breakdown — Analytic Wfm has a Nerq Trust Score of 49.5/100 (D). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-03-20).

Security Analysis → Analytic Wfm Privacy Report →

What is Analytic Wfm's trust score?

Analytic Wfm has a Nerq Trust Score of 49.5/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
90
Popularity
15

What are the key security findings for Analytic Wfm?

Analytic Wfm's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.

Security score: 90/100 (strong)
Popularity: 15/100 — community adoption

What is Analytic Wfm and who maintains it?

AuthorNone
CategoryPython Packages
SourceN/A

Analytic Wfm Across Platforms

Same developer/company in other registries:

none
52/100 · steam
CivilContract
50/100 · steam
Time Virus
50/100 · steam
Chess: King of Crowns Chess Online
50/100 · steam
Sakura Dimensions
50/100 · steam

Similar Pypi by Trust Score

ady (60)bittensor-drand (60)cfnresponse (60)agent-framework-claude (60)async-exit-stack (60)
See all safest Pypi →

Compare

Analytic Wfm vs adyAnalytic Wfm vs bittensor-drandAnalytic Wfm vs cfnresponse

Safety Guide: Analytic Wfm

What is Analytic Wfm?

Analytic Wfm is a Python package — peak detection algorithms.

How to Verify Safety

Run pip audit or safety check. Review on PyPI for download stats.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=analytic-wfm

Key Safety Concerns for Python package

When evaluating any Python package, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, malicious uploads, maintenance status.

Measured Signals

Analytic Wfm has a Nerq Trust Score of 50/100 (D). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Analytic Wfm Safe?
analytic-wfm with a Nerq Trust Score of 49.5/100 (D). Strongest signal: security (90/100). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (15/100).
What is Analytic Wfm's trust score?
analytic-wfm: 49.5/100 (D). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (15/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=analytic-wfm
What are safer alternatives to Analytic Wfm?
In the Python Packages category, more Python packages are being analyzed — check back soon. analytic-wfm scores 49.5/100.
Does Analytic Wfm have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Analytic Wfm against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 90/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Is Analytic Wfm actively maintained?
Analytic Wfm maintenance score: N/A. Check the repository for recent commit activity and issue responsiveness.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy