Is Bitflags Safe?

Bitflags — Nerq Trust Score 47.8/100 (D grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is has notable safety concerns. Last updated: 2026-04-01.

Exercise caution with Bitflags. Bitflags is a Rust crate with a Nerq Trust Score of 47.8/100 (D), based on 3 independent data dimensions. It is below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 65/100. Popularity: 95/100. Data sourced from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database. Last updated: 2026-04-01. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Bitflags safe?

NO — USE WITH CAUTION — Bitflags has a Nerq Trust Score of 47.8/100 (D). It has below-average trust signals with significant gaps in security, maintenance, or documentation. Not recommended for production use without thorough manual review and additional security measures.

Security Analysis → {name} Privacy Report →

What is Bitflags's trust score?

Bitflags has a Nerq Trust Score of 47.8/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
65
Popularity
95

What are the key security findings for Bitflags?

Bitflags's strongest signal is popularity at 95/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Security score: 65/100 (moderate)
Popularity: 95/100 — community adoption

What is Bitflags and who maintains it?

AuthorUnknown
Categorycrates
SourceN/A

Bitflags Across Platforms

Same developer/company in other registries:

bitflags
48/100 · pypi

Similar Crates by Trust Score

toml (50)ecdsa (50)dirs-next (50)peeking_take_while (50)protobuf-parse (50)
See all safest Crates →

Safety Guide: Bitflags

What is Bitflags?

Bitflags is a Rust crate — A macro to generate structures which behave like bitflags. .

How to Verify Safety

Run cargo audit. Review on crates.io for activity.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=bitflags

Key Safety Concerns for Rust crates

When evaluating any Rust crate, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, unsafe code, maintenance status.

Trust Assessment

Bitflags has a Nerq Trust Score of 48/100 (D) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Detailed Score Analysis

DimensionScore
Security65/100
Privacy80/100
Reliability90/100
Transparency50/100
Maintenance60/100

Based on 5 dimensions. Data from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database.

What data does Bitflags collect?

Bitflags is a Rust crate maintained by Unknown. It receives approximately 1,122,210,058 weekly downloads.

As a development package, Bitflags does not directly collect end-user personal data. However, applications built with it may collect data depending on implementation. Privacy score: 80/100.

Review the package's dependencies for potential supply chain risks. Run your package manager's audit command regularly.

Full analysis: Bitflags Privacy Report · Privacy review

Is Bitflags secure?

Security score: 65/100. Bitflags has 0 known vulnerabilities (CVEs) in the National Vulnerability Database. This is a clean record.

License information not available. Open-source packages allow independent security review of the source code.

Run your package manager's audit command (`npm audit`, `pip audit`, `cargo audit`) to check for known vulnerabilities in your dependency tree.

Full analysis: Bitflags Security Report

Bitflags Across Platforms

Same developer/company in other registries:

bitflags (pypi, 48/100)

How we calculated this score

Bitflags's trust score of 47.8/100 (D) is computed from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database. The score reflects 5 independent dimensions: security (65/100), privacy (80/100), reliability (90/100), transparency (50/100), maintenance (60/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.

Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.

This page was last reviewed on April 01, 2026. Data version: 1.0.

Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Bitflags safe to use?
Exercise caution. bitflags has a Nerq Trust Score of 47.8/100 (D). Strongest signal: popularity (95/100). Score based on security (65/100), popularity (95/100).
What is Bitflags's trust score?
bitflags: 47.8/100 (D). Score based on: security (65/100), popularity (95/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=bitflags
What are safer alternatives to Bitflags?
In the crates category, more Rust crates are being analyzed — check back soon. bitflags scores 47.8/100.
Does Bitflags have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Bitflags against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 65/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Does Bitflags use unsafe code?
Check Bitflags's crate documentation for unsafe code usage. Trust score: 47.8/100. Fewer unsafe blocks generally indicates better memory safety.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Browse Categories

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy