Is Conventions Safe?

Conventions — Nerq Trust Score 53.0/100 (C- grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is has notable safety concerns. Last updated: 2026-04-09.

Use Conventions with some caution. Conventions is a Rust crate (working with conventions) with a Nerq Trust Score of 53.0/100 (C-), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 90/100. Popularity: 45/100. Data sourced from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database. Last updated: 2026-04-09. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Conventions safe?

CAUTION — Conventions has a Nerq Trust Score of 53.0/100 (C-). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.

Security Analysis → Conventions Privacy Report →

What is Conventions's trust score?

Conventions has a Nerq Trust Score of 53.0/100, earning a C- grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
90
Popularity
45

What are the key security findings for Conventions?

Conventions's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Security score: 90/100 (strong)
Popularity: 45/100 — community adoption

What is Conventions and who maintains it?

AuthorUnknown
CategoryRust Crates
SourceN/A

Conventions Across Platforms

Same developer/company in other registries:

Conventions
46/100 · nuget

Similar Crates by Trust Score

mockall_double (62)unicode-security (62)cap-fs-ext (62)wasm-bindgen-cli (62)typeshare-annotation (62)
See all safest Crates →

Compare

Conventions vs mockall_doubleConventions vs unicode-securityConventions vs cap-fs-ext

Safety Guide: Conventions

What is Conventions?

Conventions is a Rust crate — working with conventions.

How to Verify Safety

Run cargo audit. Review on crates.io for activity.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=conventions

Key Safety Concerns for Rust crate

When evaluating any Rust crate, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, unsafe code, maintenance status.

Trust Assessment

Conventions has a Nerq Trust Score of 53/100 (C-) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Conventions Safe?
Use with some caution. conventions with a Nerq Trust Score of 53.0/100 (C-). Strongest signal: security (90/100). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (45/100).
What is Conventions's trust score?
conventions: 53.0/100 (C-). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (45/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=conventions
What are safer alternatives to Conventions?
In the Rust Crates category, more Rust crates are being analyzed — check back soon. conventions scores 53.0/100.
Does Conventions have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Conventions against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 90/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Does Conventions use unsafe code?
Check Conventions's crate documentation for unsafe code usage. Trust score: 53.0/100. Fewer unsafe blocks generally indicates better memory safety.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Browse Categories

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy