Is Autometa'S Folio Safe?

Autometa'S Folio — Nerq Trust Score 50.5/100 (C- grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-03-20

Autometa'S Folio is a WordPress plugin with a Nerq Trust Score of 50.5/100 (C-), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-03-20 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 15/100. Data sourced from WordPress.org metadata, WPScan vulnerability database, active installs, and update history. Last updated: 2026-03-20. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Autometa'S Folio safe?

Trust Score Breakdown — Autometa'S Folio has a Nerq Trust Score of 50.5/100 (C-). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-03-20).

Security Analysis → Autometa'S Folio Privacy Report →

What is Autometa'S Folio's trust score?

Autometa'S Folio has a Nerq Trust Score of 50.5/100, earning a C- grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
90
Popularity
15

What are the key security findings for Autometa'S Folio?

Autometa'S Folio's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.

Security score: 90/100 (strong)
Popularity: 15/100 — WordPress.org

What is Autometa'S Folio and who maintains it?

Author<a href="https://profiles.wordpress.org/jorgeamvf/">JorgeAmVF</a>
CategoryWordPress Plugins
SourceN/A

Autometa&#039;S Folio Across Platforms

Same developer/company in other registries:

folio
55/100 · crates

Similar Wordpress by Trust Score

Conditional Menus (60)Security Ninja – WordPress Security &amp; Firewall (60)Skyboot Custom Icons for Elementor (60)Themify Portfolio Post (60)Protect WP Admin (60)
See all safest Wordpress →

Compare

Autometa&#039;S Folio vs Conditional MenusAutometa&#039;S Folio vs Security Ninja – WordPress Security &amp; FirewallAutometa&#039;S Folio vs Skyboot Custom Icons for Elementor

Safety Guide: Autometa&#039;S Folio

What is Autometa&#039;S Folio?

Autometa&#039;S Folio is a WordPress plugin — It reproduces portfolio categories and attributes in portfolios and it generates a cloud mixing categories and attributes of portfolios simply via: [p &hellip;.

How to Verify Safety

Check WordPress.org for support response time, tested WP version. Cross-reference with WPScan.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=autometa&amp;#039;s FOLIO

Key Safety Concerns for WordPress plugin

When evaluating any WordPress plugin, watch for: known vulnerabilities, PHP compatibility, plugin conflicts.

Measured Signals

Autometa&#039;S Folio has a Nerq Trust Score of 50/100 (C-). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Autometa&#039;S Folio Safe?
autometa&#039;s FOLIO with a Nerq Trust Score of 50.5/100 (C-). Strongest signal: security (90/100). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (15/100).
What is Autometa&#039;S Folio's trust score?
autometa&#039;s FOLIO: 50.5/100 (C-). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (15/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=autometa&#039;s FOLIO
What are safer alternatives to Autometa&#039;S Folio?
In the WordPress Plugins category, more WordPress plugins are being analyzed — check back soon. autometa&#039;s FOLIO scores 50.5/100.
Does Autometa&#039;S Folio have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Autometa&#039;S Folio against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 90/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Is Autometa&#039;S Folio compatible with the latest WordPress?
Autometa&#039;S Folio has a Nerq Trust Score of 50.5/100 (C-), measured 2026-03-20. Review the signal breakdown above against your own requirements.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Browse Categories

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy