Is Fruit Ninja® Safe?
Fruit Ninja® — Nerq Trust Score 59.0/100 (C grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12
Fruit Ninja® is a iOS app with a Nerq Trust Score of 59.0/100 (C), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12 Security: 70/100. Popularity: 60/100. Data sourced from App Store metadata, privacy labels, permissions analysis, and developer history. Last updated: 2026-04-12. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Fruit Ninja® safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Fruit Ninja® has a Nerq Trust Score of 59.0/100 (C). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-04-12).
What is Fruit Ninja®'s trust score?
Fruit Ninja® has a Nerq Trust Score of 59.0/100, earning a C grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Fruit Ninja®?
Fruit Ninja®'s strongest signal is security at 70/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Fruit Ninja® and who maintains it?
| Author | Halfbrick Studios |
| Category | iOS Apps |
| Source | N/A |
Fruit Ninja® Across Platforms
Same developer/company in other registries:
Similar Ios by Trust Score
Safety Guide: Fruit Ninja®
What is Fruit Ninja®?
Fruit Ninja® is a iOS app — Slice fruit, don’t slice bombs – that’s all you need to know to get started with addictive Fruit Ninja action! No matter how you like to play, the free version of the game is packed with features to.
How to Verify Safety
Check App Store privacy labels. Review permissions. Look up developer.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=Fruit Ninja®
Key Safety Concerns for iOS app
When evaluating any iOS app, watch for: excessive permissions, data collection, in-app purchases, age appropriateness.
Measured Signals
Fruit Ninja® has a Nerq Trust Score of 59/100 (C). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Fruit Ninja® has a Trust Score of 59/100 (C).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Detailed Score Analysis
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Security | 70/100 |
| Maintenance | 60/100 |
| Popularity | 60/100 |
| Quality | 50/100 |
| Community | 50/100 |
Based on 5 dimensions. Data from App Store metadata, privacy labels, permissions analysis, and developer history.
What data does Fruit Ninja® collect?
Privacy assessment for Fruit Ninja® is not yet available. See our methodology for how Nerq measures privacy, or the public privacy review for any community-contributed notes.
Is Fruit Ninja® secure?
Security score: 70/100 (0-100, higher = fewer measured security issues).
Nerq monitors this entity against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases for ongoing security assessment.
Full analysis: Fruit Ninja® Security Report
Fruit Ninja® Across Platforms
Same developer/company in other registries:
How we calculated this score
Fruit Ninja®'s trust score of 59.0/100 (C) is computed from App Store metadata, privacy labels, permissions analysis, and developer history. The score reflects 5 independent dimensions: security (70/100), maintenance (60/100), popularity (60/100), quality (50/100), community (50/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.
Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.
Signals last measured on April 12, 2026. Data version: 0.0.
Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Fruit Ninja® Safe?
What is Fruit Ninja®'s trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Fruit Ninja®?
Is Fruit Ninja® safe for kids?
Does Fruit Ninja® collect my data?
Popular in iOS Apps
Browse Categories
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.