Is Humanreadable Safe?

Humanreadable — Nerq Trust Score 63.5/100 (C+ grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is generally safe but has some concerns. Last updated: 2026-07-30.

Use Humanreadable with some caution. Humanreadable is a Python package with a Nerq Trust Score of 63.5/100 (C+), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 90/100. Popularity: 75/100. Data sourced from PyPI registry, GitHub repository, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-07-22. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Humanreadable safe?

CAUTION — Humanreadable has a Nerq Trust Score of 63.5/100 (C+). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.

Security Analysis → Humanreadable Privacy Report →

What is Humanreadable's trust score?

Humanreadable has a Nerq Trust Score of 63.5/100, earning a C+ grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
90
Popularity
75

What are the key security findings for Humanreadable?

Humanreadable's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Security score: 90/100 (strong)
Popularity: 75/100 — community adoption

What is Humanreadable and who maintains it?

AuthorTsuyoshi Hombashi
CategoryPython Packages
SourceN/A

Similar Pypi by Trust Score

adal (74)html5lib (74)azure-keyvault-certificates (74)azure-mgmt-datafactory (74)azure-mgmt-redis (74)
See all safest Pypi →

Compare

Humanreadable vs adalHumanreadable vs html5libHumanreadable vs azure-keyvault-certificates

Safety Guide: Humanreadable

What is Humanreadable?

Humanreadable is a Python package — humanreadable is a Python library to convert human-readable values to other units..

How to Verify Safety

Run pip audit or safety check. Review on PyPI for download stats.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=humanreadable

Key Safety Concerns for Python package

When evaluating any Python package, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, malicious uploads, maintenance status.

Trust Assessment

Humanreadable has a Nerq Trust Score of 64/100 (C+) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Humanreadable Safe?
Use with some caution. humanreadable with a Nerq Trust Score of 63.5/100 (C+). Strongest signal: security (90/100). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (75/100).
What is Humanreadable's trust score?
humanreadable: 63.5/100 (C+). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (75/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=humanreadable
What are safer alternatives to Humanreadable?
In the Python Packages category, more Python packages are being analyzed — check back soon. humanreadable scores 63.5/100.
Does Humanreadable have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Humanreadable against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 90/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Is Humanreadable actively maintained?
Humanreadable maintenance score: N/A. Check the repository for recent commit activity and issue responsiveness.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy