Is Humanreadable Safe?
Humanreadable — Nerq Trust Score 63.5/100 (C+ grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is generally safe but has some concerns. Last updated: 2026-07-30.
Use Humanreadable with some caution. Humanreadable is a Python package with a Nerq Trust Score of 63.5/100 (C+), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 90/100. Popularity: 75/100. Data sourced from PyPI registry, GitHub repository, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-07-22. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Humanreadable safe?
CAUTION — Humanreadable has a Nerq Trust Score of 63.5/100 (C+). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.
What is Humanreadable's trust score?
Humanreadable has a Nerq Trust Score of 63.5/100, earning a C+ grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Humanreadable?
Humanreadable's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.
What is Humanreadable and who maintains it?
| Author | Tsuyoshi Hombashi |
| Category | Python Packages |
| Source | N/A |
Similar Pypi by Trust Score
Safety Guide: Humanreadable
What is Humanreadable?
Humanreadable is a Python package — humanreadable is a Python library to convert human-readable values to other units..
How to Verify Safety
Run pip audit or safety check. Review on PyPI for download stats.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=humanreadable
Key Safety Concerns for Python package
When evaluating any Python package, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, malicious uploads, maintenance status.
Trust Assessment
Humanreadable has a Nerq Trust Score of 64/100 (C+) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Humanreadable has a Trust Score of 64/100 (C+).
- Review carefully before use — below trust threshold.
- Always verify independently using the Nerq API.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Humanreadable Safe?
What is Humanreadable's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Humanreadable?
Does Humanreadable have known vulnerabilities?
Is Humanreadable actively maintained?
Popular in Python Packages
Browse Categories
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.