Is Leo Safe?
Leo — Nerq Trust Score 53.0/100 (C- grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-03-25
Leo is a Rust crate with a Nerq Trust Score of 53.0/100 (C-), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-03-25 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 45/100. Data sourced from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database. Last updated: 2026-03-25. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Leo safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Leo has a Nerq Trust Score of 53.0/100 (C-). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-03-25).
What is Leo's trust score?
Leo has a Nerq Trust Score of 53.0/100, earning a C- grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Leo?
Leo's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Leo and who maintains it?
| Author | Unknown |
| Category | Rust Crates |
| Source | N/A |
Similar Crates by Trust Score
Safety Guide: Leo
What is Leo?
Leo is a Rust crate — leo.
How to Verify Safety
Run cargo audit. Review on crates.io for activity.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=leo
Key Safety Concerns for Rust crate
When evaluating any Rust crate, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, unsafe code, maintenance status.
Measured Signals
Leo has a Nerq Trust Score of 53/100 (C-). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Leo has a Trust Score of 53/100 (C-).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Leo Safe?
What is Leo's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Leo?
Does Leo have known vulnerabilities?
Does Leo use unsafe code?
Popular in Rust Crates
Browse Categories
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.