Is Ling Safe?

Ling — Nerq Trust Score 53.0/100 (C- grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is has notable safety concerns. Last updated: 2026-04-09.

Use Ling with some caution. Ling is a Rust crate with a Nerq Trust Score of 53.0/100 (C-), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 90/100. Popularity: 45/100. Data sourced from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database. Last updated: 2026-04-09. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Ling safe?

CAUTION — Ling has a Nerq Trust Score of 53.0/100 (C-). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.

Security Analysis → Ling Privacy Report →

What is Ling's trust score?

Ling has a Nerq Trust Score of 53.0/100, earning a C- grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
90
Popularity
45

What are the key security findings for Ling?

Ling's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Security score: 90/100 (strong)
Popularity: 45/100 — community adoption

What is Ling and who maintains it?

AuthorUnknown
CategoryRust Crates
SourceN/A

Similar Crates by Trust Score

mockall_double (62)unicode-security (62)cap-fs-ext (62)wasm-bindgen-cli (62)typeshare-annotation (62)
See all safest Crates →

Compare

Ling vs mockall_doubleLing vs unicode-securityLing vs cap-fs-ext

Safety Guide: Ling

What is Ling?

Ling is a Rust crate — Linguistics.

How to Verify Safety

Run cargo audit. Review on crates.io for activity.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=ling

Key Safety Concerns for Rust crate

When evaluating any Rust crate, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, unsafe code, maintenance status.

Trust Assessment

Ling has a Nerq Trust Score of 53/100 (C-) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Ling Safe?
Use with some caution. ling with a Nerq Trust Score of 53.0/100 (C-). Strongest signal: security (90/100). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (45/100).
What is Ling's trust score?
ling: 53.0/100 (C-). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (45/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=ling
What are safer alternatives to Ling?
In the Rust Crates category, more Rust crates are being analyzed — check back soon. ling scores 53.0/100.
Does Ling have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Ling against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 90/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Does Ling use unsafe code?
Check Ling's crate documentation for unsafe code usage. Trust score: 53.0/100. Fewer unsafe blocks generally indicates better memory safety.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Browse Categories

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy