Is Loco Translate Safe?
Loco Translate — Nerq Trust Score 75.8/100 (B+ grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12
Loco Translate is a WordPress plugin with a Nerq Trust Score of 75.8/100 (B+), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 100/100. Data sourced from WordPress.org metadata, WPScan vulnerability database, active installs, and update history. Last updated: 2026-04-12. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Loco Translate safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Loco Translate has a Nerq Trust Score of 75.8/100 (B+). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-04-12).
What is Loco Translate's trust score?
Loco Translate has a Nerq Trust Score of 75.8/100, earning a B+ grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Loco Translate?
Loco Translate's strongest signal is popularity at 100/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Loco Translate and who maintains it?
| Author | Tim W |
| Category | WordPress Plugins |
| Source | N/A |
Similar Wordpress by Trust Score
Compare
Safety Guide: Loco Translate
What is Loco Translate?
Loco Translate is a WordPress plugin — Translate WordPress plugins and themes directly in your browser. Versatile PO file editor with integrated AI translation providers..
How to Verify Safety
Check WordPress.org for support response time, tested WP version. Cross-reference with WPScan.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=Loco Translate
Key Safety Concerns for WordPress plugin
When evaluating any WordPress plugin, watch for: known vulnerabilities, PHP compatibility, plugin conflicts.
Measured Signals
Loco Translate has a Nerq Trust Score of 76/100 (B+). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Loco Translate has a Trust Score of 76/100 (B+).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Detailed Score Analysis
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Security | 90/100 |
| Maintenance | 100/100 |
| Popularity | 100/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 |
| Community | 35/100 |
Based on 5 dimensions. Data from WordPress.org metadata, WPScan vulnerability database, active installs, and update history.
What data does Loco Translate collect?
Loco Translate has a privacy score of 70/100. Review the documentation and privacy policy for data handling details.
Full analysis: Loco Translate Privacy Report · Privacy review
Is Loco Translate secure?
Security score: 90/100 (0-100, higher = fewer measured security issues).
Nerq monitors this entity against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases for ongoing security assessment.
Full analysis: Loco Translate Security Report
How we calculated this score
Loco Translate's trust score of 75.8/100 (B+) is computed from WordPress.org metadata, WPScan vulnerability database, active installs, and update history. The score reflects 5 independent dimensions: security (90/100), maintenance (100/100), popularity (100/100), quality (40/100), community (35/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.
Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.
Signals last measured on April 12, 2026. Data version: 1.0.
Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Loco Translate Safe?
What is Loco Translate's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Loco Translate?
Does Loco Translate have known vulnerabilities?
Is Loco Translate compatible with the latest WordPress?
Popular in WordPress Plugins
Browse Categories
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.