Is Pli Safe?
Pli — Nerq Trust Score 46.2/100 (D grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-03-25
Pli is a Rust crate with a Nerq Trust Score of 46.2/100 (D), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-03-25 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database. Last updated: 2026-03-25. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Pli safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Pli has a Nerq Trust Score of 46.2/100 (D). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-03-25).
What is Pli's trust score?
Pli has a Nerq Trust Score of 46.2/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Pli?
Pli's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Pli and who maintains it?
| Author | Unknown |
| Category | Rust Crates |
| Source | N/A |
Similar Crates by Trust Score
Safety Guide: Pli
What is Pli?
Pli is a Rust crate — pli.
How to Verify Safety
Run cargo audit. Review on crates.io for activity.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=pli
Key Safety Concerns for Rust crate
When evaluating any Rust crate, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, unsafe code, maintenance status.
Measured Signals
Pli has a Nerq Trust Score of 46/100 (D). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Pli has a Trust Score of 46/100 (D).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Pli Safe?
What is Pli's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Pli?
Does Pli have known vulnerabilities?
Does Pli use unsafe code?
Popular in Rust Crates
Browse Categories
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.