Is Repeatcmd Safe?

Repeatcmd — Nerq Trust Score 48.2/100 (D grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is has notable safety concerns. Last updated: 2026-07-22.

Exercise caution with Repeatcmd. Repeatcmd is a Rust crate with a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 90/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database. Last updated: 2026-03-25. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Repeatcmd safe?

NO — USE WITH CAUTION — Repeatcmd has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D). It has below-average trust signals with significant gaps in security, maintenance, or documentation. Not recommended for production use without thorough manual review and additional security measures.

Security Analysis → Repeatcmd Privacy Report →

What is Repeatcmd's trust score?

Repeatcmd has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
90
Popularity
0

What are the key security findings for Repeatcmd?

Repeatcmd's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Security score: 90/100 (strong)
Popularity: 0/100 — community adoption

What is Repeatcmd and who maintains it?

AuthorUnknown
CategoryRust Crates
SourceN/A

Similar Crates by Trust Score

lrtable (58)i-slint-backend-winit (58)pgrx-sql-entity-graph (58)myutil (58)rlua (58)
See all safest Crates →

Compare

Repeatcmd vs lrtableRepeatcmd vs i-slint-backend-winitRepeatcmd vs pgrx-sql-entity-graph

Safety Guide: Repeatcmd

What is Repeatcmd?

Repeatcmd is a Rust crate — run a command repeatedly until it succeeds (or fails).

How to Verify Safety

Run cargo audit. Review on crates.io for activity.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=repeatcmd

Key Safety Concerns for Rust crate

When evaluating any Rust crate, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, unsafe code, maintenance status.

Trust Assessment

Repeatcmd has a Nerq Trust Score of 48/100 (D) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Repeatcmd Safe?
Exercise caution. repeatcmd with a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D). Strongest signal: security (90/100). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (0/100).
What is Repeatcmd's trust score?
repeatcmd: 48.2/100 (D). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (0/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=repeatcmd
What are safer alternatives to Repeatcmd?
In the Rust Crates category, more Rust crates are being analyzed — check back soon. repeatcmd scores 48.2/100.
Does Repeatcmd have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Repeatcmd against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 90/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Does Repeatcmd use unsafe code?
Check Repeatcmd's crate documentation for unsafe code usage. Trust score: 48.2/100. Fewer unsafe blocks generally indicates better memory safety.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Browse Categories

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy