Is Retrying Core Safe?

Retrying Core — Nerq Trust Score 48.2/100 (D grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is has notable safety concerns. Last updated: 2026-08-01.

Exercise caution with Retrying Core. Retrying Core is a Rust crate with a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 90/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database. Last updated: 2026-03-25. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Retrying Core safe?

NO — USE WITH CAUTION — Retrying Core has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D). It has below-average trust signals with significant gaps in security, maintenance, or documentation. Not recommended for production use without thorough manual review and additional security measures.

Security Analysis → Retrying Core Privacy Report →

What is Retrying Core's trust score?

Retrying Core has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
90
Popularity
0

What are the key security findings for Retrying Core?

Retrying Core's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Security score: 90/100 (strong)
Popularity: 0/100 — community adoption

What is Retrying Core and who maintains it?

AuthorUnknown
CategoryRust Crates
SourceN/A

Similar Crates by Trust Score

lrtable (58)i-slint-backend-winit (58)pgrx-sql-entity-graph (58)myutil (58)rlua (58)
See all safest Crates →

Compare

Retrying Core vs lrtableRetrying Core vs i-slint-backend-winitRetrying Core vs pgrx-sql-entity-graph

Safety Guide: Retrying Core

What is Retrying Core?

Retrying Core is a Rust crate — Core of `retrying` library for Rust (macros).

How to Verify Safety

Run cargo audit. Review on crates.io for activity.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=retrying-core

Key Safety Concerns for Rust crate

When evaluating any Rust crate, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, unsafe code, maintenance status.

Trust Assessment

Retrying Core has a Nerq Trust Score of 48/100 (D) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Retrying Core Safe?
Exercise caution. retrying-core with a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D). Strongest signal: security (90/100). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (0/100).
What is Retrying Core's trust score?
retrying-core: 48.2/100 (D). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (0/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=retrying-core
What are safer alternatives to Retrying Core?
In the Rust Crates category, more Rust crates are being analyzed — check back soon. retrying-core scores 48.2/100.
Does Retrying Core have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Retrying Core against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 90/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Does Retrying Core use unsafe code?
Check Retrying Core's crate documentation for unsafe code usage. Trust score: 48.2/100. Fewer unsafe blocks generally indicates better memory safety.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Browse Categories

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy