Is Tree Sitter Java Safe?

Tree Sitter Java — Nerq Trust Score 59.8/100 (C grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-03-21

Tree Sitter Java is a Rust crate with a Nerq Trust Score of 59.8/100 (C), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-03-21 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 90/100. Data sourced from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database. Last updated: 2026-03-21. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Tree Sitter Java safe?

Trust Score Breakdown — Tree Sitter Java has a Nerq Trust Score of 59.8/100 (C). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-03-21).

Security Analysis → Tree Sitter Java Privacy Report →

What is Tree Sitter Java's trust score?

Tree Sitter Java has a Nerq Trust Score of 59.8/100, earning a C grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
90
Popularity
90

What are the key security findings for Tree Sitter Java?

Tree Sitter Java's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.

✓Security score: 90/100 (strong)
⚠Popularity: 90/100 — community adoption

What is Tree Sitter Java and who maintains it?

AuthorUnknown
CategoryRust Crates
SourceN/A

Similar Crates by Trust Score

indexmap (63)crypto-common (63)darling_core (63)windows-core (63)oorandom (63)
See all safest Crates →

Compare

Tree Sitter Java vs indexmapTree Sitter Java vs crypto-commonTree Sitter Java vs darling_core

Safety Guide: Tree Sitter Java

What is Tree Sitter Java?

Tree Sitter Java is a Rust crate — Java grammar for tree-sitter.

How to Verify Safety

Run cargo audit. Review on crates.io for activity.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=tree-sitter-java

Key Safety Concerns for Rust crate

When evaluating any Rust crate, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, unsafe code, maintenance status.

Measured Signals

Tree Sitter Java has a Nerq Trust Score of 60/100 (C). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Tree Sitter Java Safe?
tree-sitter-java with a Nerq Trust Score of 59.8/100 (C). Strongest signal: security (90/100). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (90/100).
What is Tree Sitter Java's trust score?
tree-sitter-java: 59.8/100 (C). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (90/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=tree-sitter-java
What are safer alternatives to Tree Sitter Java?
In the Rust Crates category, more Rust crates are being analyzed — check back soon. tree-sitter-java scores 59.8/100.
Does Tree Sitter Java have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Tree Sitter Java against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 90/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Does Tree Sitter Java use unsafe code?
Check Tree Sitter Java's crate documentation for unsafe code usage. Trust score: 59.8/100. Fewer unsafe blocks generally indicates better memory safety.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Browse Categories

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy