Language Server è sicuro?

Language Server — Nerq Trust Score 59.5/100 (Grado D). Sulla base dell'analisi di 4 dimensioni di fiducia, è ha preoccupazioni di sicurezza notevoli. Ultimo aggiornamento: 2026-04-05.

Usa Language Server con cautela. Language Server è un software tool con un Punteggio di fiducia Nerq di 59.5/100 (D), based on 4 dimensioni di dati indipendenti. Sotto la soglia verificata Nerq Manutenzione: 0/100. Popolarità: 0/100. Dati provenienti da molteplici fonti pubbliche tra cui registri di pacchetti, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev e OpenSSF Scorecard. Ultimo aggiornamento: 2026-04-05. Dati leggibili dalle macchine (JSON).

Language Server è sicuro?

CAUTION — Language Server has a Nerq Trust Score of 59.5/100 (D). Ha segnali di fiducia moderati ma mostra alcune aree di preoccupazione that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review sicurezza and manutenzione signals before production deployment.

Analisi di Sicurezza → Report sulla privacy di Language Server →

Qual è il punteggio di fiducia di Language Server?

Language Server ha un Nerq Trust Score di 59.5/100 con voto D. Questo punteggio si basa su 4 dimensioni misurate indipendentemente, tra cui sicurezza, manutenzione e adozione della community.

Conformità
100
Manutenzione
0
Documentazione
0
Popolarità
0

Quali sono i risultati di sicurezza chiave per Language Server?

Il segnale più forte di Language Server è conformità a 100/100. Non sono state rilevate vulnerabilità note. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Manutenzione: 0/100 — bassa attività di manutenzione
Conformità: 100/100 — covers 52 of 52 jurisdictions
Documentazione: 0/100 — documentazione limitata
Popolarità: 0/100 — adozione comunitaria

Cos'è Language Server e chi lo mantiene?

AutoreGitHub Actions
CategoriaCoding
Fontehttps://www.npmjs.com/package/@marko/language-server

Conformità normativa

EU AI Act Risk ClassNot assessed
Compliance Score100/100
JurisdictionsAssessed across 52 jurisdictions

Alternative popolari in coding

Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT
74.7/100 · B
github
ollama/ollama
73.8/100 · B
github
langchain-ai/langchain
86.4/100 · A
github
x1xhlol/system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-tools
73.8/100 · B
github
anomalyco/opencode
87.9/100 · A
github

Language Server su altre piattaforme

Stesso sviluppatore/azienda in altri registri:

@nuxtjs/color-mode
76/100 · npm
@nomicfoundation/hardhat-zod-utils
74/100 · npm
@nomicfoundation/slang
72/100 · npm
@nomicfoundation/hardhat-viem-assertions
70/100 · npm
@nomicfoundation/hardhat-mocha
70/100 · npm

What Is Language Server?

Language Server is a software tool in the coding category: Marko Language Server provides code completion and syntax checking for developers.. Nerq Trust Score: 60/100 (D).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including sicurezza vulnerabilities, manutenzione activity, license conformità, and adozione della comunità.

How Nerq Assesses Language Server's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensioni. Here is how Language Server performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 59.5/100 (D) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.

Who Should Use Language Server?

Language Server is designed for:

Risk guidance: Language Server is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its sicurezza posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.

How to Verify Language Server's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — Controlla repository sicurezza policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active manutenzione.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Language Server's dependency tree.
  3. Recensione permissions — Understand what access Language Server requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Language Server in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=@marko/language-server
  6. Controlla license — Confirm that Language Server's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses sicurezza concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Language Server

When evaluating whether Language Server is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Language Server processes, stores, and transmits your data. Controlla tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency sicurezza

Check Language Server's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher sicurezza risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Language Server. Sicurezza patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Language Server connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP conformità

Verify that Language Server's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Language Server in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Best Practices for Using Language Server Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Language Server while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Language Server is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and conformità with your sicurezza policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Language Server and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from sicurezza patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Language Server only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for sicurezza advisories

Subscribe to Language Server's sicurezza advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Language Server is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

When Should You Avoid Language Server?

Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Language Server in these scenarios:

For each scenario, evaluate whether Language Server's trust score of 59.5/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual sicurezza assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.

How Language Server Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among coding tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Language Server's score of 59.5/100 is near the category average of 62/100.

This places Language Server in line with the typical coding tool tool. It meets baseline expectations but does not distinguish itself from peers on trust metrics.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderato in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Language Server and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or manutenzione patterns change, Language Server's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to sicurezza and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced manutenzione, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Language Server's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=@marko/language-server&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — sicurezza, manutenzione, documentazione, conformità, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Language Server are strengthening or weakening over time.

Language Server vs Alternative

In the coding category, Language Server scores 59.5/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:

Punti chiave

Domande frequenti

Language Server è sicuro?
Usa con cautela. @marko/language-server con un Punteggio di fiducia Nerq di 59.5/100 (D). Segnale più forte: conformità (100/100). Punteggio basato su Manutenzione (0/100), Popolarità (0/100), Documentazione (0/100).
Qual è il punteggio di fiducia di Language Server?
@marko/language-server: 59.5/100 (D). Punteggio basato su Manutenzione (0/100), Popolarità (0/100), Documentazione (0/100). Compliance: 100/100. I punteggi si aggiornano quando nuovi dati diventano disponibili. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=@marko/language-server
What are safer alternatives to Language Server?
Nella categoria Coding, higher-rated alternatives include Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT (75/100), ollama/ollama (74/100), langchain-ai/langchain (86/100). @marko/language-server scores 59.5/100.
How often is Language Server's safety score updated?
Nerq continuously monitors Language Server and updates its trust score as new data becomes available. Dati provenienti da molteplici fonti pubbliche tra cui registri di pacchetti, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev e OpenSSF Scorecard. Current: 59.5/100 (D), last verificato 2026-04-05. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=@marko/language-server
Can I use Language Server in a regulated environment?
Language Server has not reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. Additional due diligence is recommended for regulated environments.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Vedi anche

Disclaimer: I punteggi di fiducia Nerq sono valutazioni automatizzate basate su segnali disponibili pubblicamente. Non costituiscono raccomandazioni o garanzie. Effettua sempre la tua verifica personale.

Utilizziamo i cookie per analisi e caching. Privacy