Society Agent è sicuro?
Society Agent — Nerq Trust Score 62.1/100 (Grado C). Punteggio basato su 5 independent trust signals.
Society Agent è un software tool con un Punteggio di fiducia Nerq di 62.1/100 (C), based on 5 dimensioni di dati indipendenti. Sicurezza: 0/100. Manutenzione: 1/100. Popolarità: 0/100. Dati provenienti da molteplici fonti pubbliche tra cui registri di pacchetti, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev e OpenSSF Scorecard. Ultimo aggiornamento: n/a. Dati leggibili dalle macchine (JSON).
Society Agent è sicuro?
Dettagli punteggio di fiducia — Society Agent has a Nerq Trust Score of 62.1/100 (C). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.
Qual è il punteggio di fiducia di Society Agent?
Society Agent ha un Nerq Trust Score di 62.1/100 con voto C. Questo punteggio si basa su 5 dimensioni misurate indipendentemente, tra cui sicurezza, manutenzione e adozione della community.
Quali sono i risultati di sicurezza chiave per Society Agent?
Il segnale più forte di Society Agent è conformità a 100/100. Non sono state rilevate vulnerabilità note.
Cos'è Society Agent e chi lo mantiene?
| Autore | chrysochos |
| Categoria | Coding |
| Fonte | https://github.com/chrysochos/society-agent |
Conformità normativa
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 100/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Alternative popolari in coding
What Is Society Agent?
Society Agent is a software tool in the coding category: Purpose-driven multi-agent system for VS Code.. Nerq Trust Score: 62/100 (C).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including sicurezza vulnerabilities, manutenzione activity, license conformità, and adozione della comunità.
How Nerq Assesses Society Agent's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensioni. Here is how Society Agent performs in each:
- Sicurezza (0/100): Society Agent's sicurezza posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, sicurezza policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Manutenzione (1/100): Society Agent is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API documentazione, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (100/100): Society Agent is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Basato su GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 62.1/100 (C) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.
Who Typically Evaluates Society Agent?
Society Agent is commonly evaluated by:
- Developers and teams working with coding tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
How to read the signals: Society Agent's measured signals (sicurezza 0/100, manutenzione 1/100, documentazione 1/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.
How to Verify Society Agent's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Controlla repository's sicurezza policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active manutenzione.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Society Agent's dependency tree. - Recensione permissions — Understand what access Society Agent requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Society Agent in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=society-agent - Controlla license — Confirm that Society Agent's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses sicurezza concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Society Agent
When evaluating whether Society Agent is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Society Agent processes, stores, and transmits your data. Controlla tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Society Agent's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher sicurezza risk.
Regularly check for updates to Society Agent. Sicurezza patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Society Agent connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Society Agent's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Society Agent in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Society Agent and the EU AI Act
Society Agent is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's conformità assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal conformità.
Best Practices for Using Society Agent Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Society Agent while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Society Agent is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and conformità with your sicurezza policies.
Ensure Society Agent and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from sicurezza patches.
Grant Society Agent only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Society Agent's sicurezza advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Society Agent is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Society Agent
Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Society Agent's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:
- Environments handling sensitive or regulated data (healthcare, finance, government)
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
- Deployments with strict regulatory requirements that must be independently validated
For each situation, compare Society Agent's measured trust score of 62.1/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Society Agent is suitable for any particular use.
How Society Agent Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among coding tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Society Agent's score of 62.1/100 is above the category average of 62/100.
This positions Society Agent favorably among coding tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimensioni.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderato in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Society Agent and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or manutenzione patterns change, Society Agent's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to sicurezza and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced manutenzione, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Society Agent's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=society-agent&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — sicurezza, manutenzione, documentazione, conformità, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Society Agent are strengthening or weakening over time.
Society Agent vs Alternative
In the coding category, Society Agent scores 62.1/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Society Agent vs AutoGPT — Trust Score: 65.3/100
- Society Agent vs ollama — Trust Score: 64.4/100
- Society Agent vs langchain — Trust Score: 77.0/100
Punti chiave
- Society Agent has a measured Nerq Trust Score of 62.1/100 (C) — a composite of independent signals, not a suitability judgment.
- Among coding tools, Society Agent scores above the category average of 62/100 (a positional measurement relative to peers).
- The individual signals — sicurezza, manutenzione, documentazione, conformità, community — are shown above. Weigh them against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via Nerq's Preflight API.
Domande frequenti
Society Agent è sicuro?
Qual è il punteggio di fiducia di Society Agent?
Quali sono alternative più sicure a Society Agent?
Con che frequenza viene aggiornato il punteggio di Society Agent?
Posso usare Society Agent in un ambiente regolamentato?
Vedi anche
Disclaimer: I punteggi di fiducia Nerq sono valutazioni automatizzate basate su segnali disponibili pubblicamente. Non costituiscono raccomandazioni o garanzie. Effettua sempre la tua verifica personale.