Skyvernは安全ですか?
Skyvern — Nerq Trust Score 58.9/100 (Cグレード). 3つの信頼次元の分析に基づき、顕著なセキュリティ上の懸念があると評価されています。 最終更新:2026-04-23。
Skyvernは注意して使用してください。 Skyvern はsoftware toolです Nerq信頼スコア58.9/100(C), 3つの独立したデータ次元に基づく. Nerq認証閾値未満 メンテナンス: 0/100. 人気度: 1/100. データソース: パッケージレジストリ、GitHub、NVD、OSV.dev、OpenSSF Scorecardを含む複数の公開ソース. 最終更新: 2026-04-23. 機械可読データ(JSON).
Skyvernは安全ですか?
CAUTION — Skyvern has a Nerq Trust Score of 58.9/100 (C). 中程度の信頼シグナルがありますが、一部懸念される領域があります that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review セキュリティ and メンテナンス signals before production deployment.
Skyvernの信頼スコアは?
SkyvernのNerq信頼スコアは58.9/100で、Cグレードです。このスコアはセキュリティ、メンテナンス、コミュニティ採用を含む3の独立した次元に基づいています。
Skyvernの主なセキュリティ調査結果は?
Skyvernの最も強いシグナルは人気度で1/100です。 既知の脆弱性は検出されていません。 Nerq認証閾値70+にまだ達していません。
Skyvernとは何で、誰が管理していますか?
| 作者 | https://github.com/skyvern-ai/skyvern/tree/HEAD/integrations/mcp |
| カテゴリ | Devops |
| Stars | 20,714 |
| Source | https://github.com/skyvern-ai/skyvern/tree/HEAD/integrations/mcp |
devopsの人気の代替品
What Is Skyvern?
Skyvern is a DevOps tool: Skyvern controls your browser for automation.. It has 20,714 GitHubスター. Nerq Trust Score: 59/100 (C).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including セキュリティ vulnerabilities, メンテナンス activity, license コンプライアンス, and コミュニティでの採用.
How Nerq Assesses Skyvern's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five 次元. Here is how Skyvern performs in each:
- メンテナンス (0/100): Skyvern is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (0/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API ドキュメント, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Community (1/100): Community adoption is limited. に基づく GitHubスター, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 58.9/100 (C) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.
Who Should Use Skyvern?
Skyvern is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with devops tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Skyvern is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its セキュリティ posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.
How to Verify Skyvern's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — 確認してください repository セキュリティ policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active メンテナンス.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Skyvern's dependency tree. - レビュー permissions — Understand what access Skyvern requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Skyvern in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Skyvern - 確認してください license — Confirm that Skyvern's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses セキュリティ concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Skyvern
When evaluating whether Skyvern is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Skyvern processes, stores, and transmits your data. 確認してください tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Skyvern's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher セキュリティ risk.
Regularly check for updates to Skyvern. セキュリティ patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Skyvern connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Skyvern's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Skyvern in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Best Practices for Using Skyvern Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Skyvern while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Skyvern is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and コンプライアンス with your セキュリティ policies.
Ensure Skyvern and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from セキュリティ patches.
Grant Skyvern only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Skyvern's セキュリティ advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Skyvern is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Skyvern?
Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Skyvern in these scenarios:
- Production environments handling sensitive customer data
- Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) without additional コンプライアンス review
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
For each scenario, evaluate whether Skyvern's trust score of 58.9/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual セキュリティ assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.
How Skyvern Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among DevOps tools, the average Trust Score is 63/100. Skyvern's score of 58.9/100 is near the category average of 63/100.
This places Skyvern in line with the typical DevOps tool tool. It meets baseline expectations but does not distinguish itself from peers on trust metrics.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks 中程度 in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Skyvern and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or メンテナンス patterns change, Skyvern's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to セキュリティ and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced メンテナンス, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Skyvern's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Skyvern&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — セキュリティ, メンテナンス, ドキュメント, コンプライアンス, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Skyvern are strengthening or weakening over time.
Skyvern vs 代替品
In the devops category, Skyvern scores 58.9/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Skyvern vs ansible — Trust Score: 76.8/100
- Skyvern vs Flowise — Trust Score: 63.3/100
- Skyvern vs learn-claude-code — Trust Score: 69.2/100
重要なポイント
- Skyvern has a Trust Score of 58.9/100 (C) and is not yet Nerq Verified.
- Skyvern shows 中程度 trust signals. Conduct thorough due diligence before deploying to production environments.
- Among DevOps tools, Skyvern scores near the category average of 63/100, suggesting room for improvement relative to peers.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
詳細なスコア分析
| 次元 | スコア |
|---|---|
| メンテナンス | 0/100 |
| 人気度 | 1/100 |
に基づく 2 次元. データソース: パッケージレジストリ、GitHub、NVD、OSV.dev、OpenSSF Scorecardを含む複数の公開ソース.
Skyvernはどのようなデータを収集しますか?
プライバシー assessment for Skyvern is not yet available. See our methodology for how Nerq measures privacy, or the public privacy review for any community-contributed notes.
Skyvernは安全ですか?
セキュリティスコア: 評価中. Review セキュリティ practices and consider alternatives with higher セキュリティ scores for sensitive use cases.
NerqはNVD、OSV.dev、およびレジストリ固有の脆弱性データベースに対してこのエンティティを監視しています 継続的なセキュリティ評価のため.
完全な分析: Skyvern セキュリティレポート
このスコアの算出方法
Skyvern's trust score of 58.9/100 (C) は以下から算出されます パッケージレジストリ、GitHub、NVD、OSV.dev、OpenSSF Scorecardを含む複数の公開ソース. スコアは以下を反映しています 2 独立した次元: メンテナンス (0/100), 人気度 (1/100). 各次元は均等に重み付けされ、複合信頼スコアが算出されます.
Nerqは26のレジストリにわたる750万以上のエンティティを分析しています 同じ方法論を使用し、エンティティ間の直接比較を可能にします. 新しいデータが利用可能になり次第、スコアは継続的に更新されます.
このページの最終レビュー日: April 23, 2026. データバージョン: 1.0.
よくある質問
Skyvernは安全ですか?
Skyvernの信頼スコアは?
Skyvernのより安全な代替は何ですか?
Skyvernの安全性スコアはどのくらいの頻度で更新されますか?
規制環境でSkyvernを使用できますか?
関連項目
Disclaimer: Nerqの信頼スコアは、公開されている情報に基づく自動評価です。推奨や保証ではありません。必ずご自身でも確認してください。