Docker Gc은(는) 안전한가요?
Docker Gc — Nerq Trust Score 63.8/100 (C 등급). 5개의 신뢰 차원 분석 결과, 대체로 안전하지만 일부 우려 사항이 있음으로 평가됩니다. 마지막 업데이트: 2026-04-06.
Docker Gc을(를) 주의하며 사용하세요. Docker Gc 은(는) software tool입니다 Nerq 신뢰 점수 63.8/100 (C), 5개의 독립적으로 측정된 데이터 차원 기반. Nerq 인증 기준 미달 보안: 0/100. 유지보수: 0/100. 인기도: 0/100. 패키지 레지스트리, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, OpenSSF Scorecard를 포함한 여러 공개 소스에서 수집된 데이터. 마지막 업데이트: 2026-04-06. 기계 판독 가능 데이터 (JSON).
Docker Gc은(는) 안전한가요?
CAUTION — Docker Gc has a Nerq Trust Score of 63.8/100 (C). 보통 수준의 신뢰 신호가 있지만 일부 우려 사항이 있습니다 that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review 보안 and 유지보수 signals before production deployment.
Docker Gc의 신뢰 점수는?
Docker Gc의 Nerq 신뢰 점수는 63.8/100이며 C 등급입니다. 이 점수는 보안, 유지보수, 커뮤니티 채택을 포함한 5개의 독립적으로 측정된 차원을 기반으로 합니다.
Docker Gc의 주요 보안 발견 사항은?
Docker Gc의 가장 강한 신호는 규정 준수이며 100/100입니다. 알려진 취약점이 감지되지 않았습니다. 아직 Nerq 인증 임계값 70+에 도달하지 못했습니다.
Docker Gc은(는) 무엇이며 누가 관리하나요?
| 개발자 | circleci |
| 카테고리 | Devops |
| 스타 | 6 |
| 출처 | https://hub.docker.com/r/circleci/docker-gc |
| Protocols | docker |
규정 준수
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 100/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 관할권s |
devops의 인기 대안
다른 플랫폼의 Docker Gc
다른 레지스트리의 동일 개발자/회사:
What Is Docker Gc?
Docker Gc is a DevOps tool: Agent for performing Docker image cache LRU garbage collection.. It has 6 GitHub stars. Nerq Trust Score: 64/100 (C).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including 보안 vulnerabilities, 유지보수 activity, license 규정 준수, and 커뮤니티 채택.
How Nerq Assesses Docker Gc's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five 차원. Here is how Docker Gc performs in each:
- 보안 (0/100): Docker Gc's 보안 posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, 보안 policy presence, and code signing practices.
- 유지보수 (0/100): Docker Gc is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (0/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API 문서화, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (100/100): Docker Gc is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 관할권s including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. 기반: GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 63.8/100 (C) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.
Who Should Use Docker Gc?
Docker Gc is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with devops tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Docker Gc is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its 보안 posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.
How to Verify Docker Gc's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — 다음을 검토하세요: repository 보안 policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active 유지보수.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Docker Gc's dependency tree. - 리뷰 permissions — Understand what access Docker Gc requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Docker Gc in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=docker-gc - 다음을 검토하세요: license — Confirm that Docker Gc's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses 보안 concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Docker Gc
When evaluating whether Docker Gc is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Docker Gc processes, stores, and transmits your data. 다음을 검토하세요: tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Docker Gc's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher 보안 risk.
Regularly check for updates to Docker Gc. 보안 patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Docker Gc connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Docker Gc's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Docker Gc in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Docker Gc and the EU AI Act
Docker Gc is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's 규정 준수 assessment covers 52 관할권s worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal 규정 준수.
Best Practices for Using Docker Gc Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Docker Gc while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Docker Gc is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and 규정 준수 with your 보안 policies.
Ensure Docker Gc and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from 보안 patches.
Grant Docker Gc only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Docker Gc's 보안 advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Docker Gc is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Docker Gc?
Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Docker Gc in these scenarios:
- Production environments handling sensitive customer data
- Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) without additional 규정 준수 review
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
For each scenario, evaluate whether Docker Gc's trust score of 63.8/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual 보안 assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.
How Docker Gc Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among DevOps tools, the average Trust Score is 63/100. Docker Gc's score of 63.8/100 is above the category average of 63/100.
This positions Docker Gc favorably among DevOps tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust 차원.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks 보통 in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Docker Gc and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or 유지보수 patterns change, Docker Gc's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to 보안 and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced 유지보수, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Docker Gc's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=docker-gc&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — 보안, 유지보수, 문서화, 규정 준수, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Docker Gc are strengthening or weakening over time.
Docker Gc vs 대안
In the devops category, Docker Gc scores 63.8/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Docker Gc vs ansible — Trust Score: 84.3/100
- Docker Gc vs Flowise — Trust Score: 76.9/100
- Docker Gc vs learn-claude-code — Trust Score: 81.5/100
주요 요점
- Docker Gc has a Trust Score of 63.8/100 (C) and is not yet Nerq Verified.
- Docker Gc shows 보통 trust signals. Conduct thorough due diligence before deploying to production environments.
- Among DevOps tools, Docker Gc scores above the category average of 63/100, demonstrating above-average reliability.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
자주 묻는 질문
Docker Gc은(는) 안전한가요?
Docker Gc의 신뢰 점수는?
What are safer alternatives to Docker Gc?
How often is Docker Gc's safety score updated?
Can I use Docker Gc in a regulated environment?
참고 항목
Disclaimer: Nerq 신뢰 점수는 공개적으로 사용 가능한 신호를 기반으로 한 자동 평가입니다. 추천이나 보증이 아닙니다. 항상 직접 확인하세요.