Is 2026 02 10 Agentcoding veilig?

2026 02 10 Agentcoding — Nerq Trust Score 62.2/100 (C-beoordeling). Score gebaseerd op 5 independent trust signals.

2026 02 10 Agentcoding is een software tool met een Nerq Vertrouwensscore van 62.2/100 (C), based on 5 onafhankelijke gegevensdimensies. Beveiliging: 0/100. Onderhoud: 1/100. Populariteit: 0/100. Gegevens afkomstig van meerdere openbare bronnen waaronder pakketregisters, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev en OpenSSF Scorecard. Laatst bijgewerkt: n/a. Machineleesbare gegevens (JSON).

Is 2026 02 10 Agentcoding veilig?

Vertrouwensscore details — 2026 02 10 Agentcoding has a Nerq Trust Score of 62.2/100 (C). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.

Beveiligingsanalyse → 2026 02 10 Agentcoding Privacyrapport →

Wat is de vertrouwensscore van 2026 02 10 Agentcoding?

2026 02 10 Agentcoding heeft een Nerq Trust Score van 62.2/100 met het cijfer C. Deze score is gebaseerd op 5 onafhankelijk gemeten dimensies, waaronder beveiliging, onderhoud en community-adoptie.

Beveiliging
0
Naleving
100
Onderhoud
1
Documentatie
0
Populariteit
0

Wat zijn de belangrijkste beveiligingsbevindingen voor 2026 02 10 Agentcoding?

Het sterkste signaal van 2026 02 10 Agentcoding is naleving met 100/100. Er zijn geen bekende kwetsbaarheden gedetecteerd.

⚠Beveiligingsscore: 0/100 (zwak)
⚠Onderhoud: 1/100 — lage onderhoudsactiviteit
⚠Naleving: 100/100 — covers 52 of 52 jurisdicties
⚠Documentatie: 0/100 — beperkte documentatie
⚠Populariteit: 0/100 — gemeenschapsacceptatie

Wat is 2026 02 10 Agentcoding en wie onderhoudt het?

Ontwikkelaarnori3-dev
CategorieCoding
Bronhttps://github.com/nori3-dev/2026-02-10-AgentCoding

Naleving van regelgeving

EU AI Act Risk ClassMINIMAL
Compliance Score100/100
JurisdictionsAssessed across 52 jurisdicties

Populaire alternatieven in coding

Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT
65.3/100 · C
github
ollama/ollama
64.4/100 · C
github
langchain-ai/langchain
77.0/100 · B
github
x1xhlol/system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-tools
64.4/100 · C
github
anomalyco/opencode
78.5/100 · B
github

What Is 2026 02 10 Agentcoding?

2026 02 10 Agentcoding is a software tool in the coding category: A coding agent.. Nerq Trust Score: 62/100 (C).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including beveiliging vulnerabilities, onderhoud activity, license naleving, and gemeenschapsacceptatie.

How Nerq Assesses 2026 02 10 Agentcoding's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensies. Here is how 2026 02 10 Agentcoding performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 62.2/100 (C) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.

Who Typically Evaluates 2026 02 10 Agentcoding?

2026 02 10 Agentcoding is commonly evaluated by:

How to read the signals: 2026 02 10 Agentcoding's measured signals (beveiliging 0/100, onderhoud 1/100, documentatie 0/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.

How to Verify 2026 02 10 Agentcoding's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — Bekijk de repository's beveiliging policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active onderhoud.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in 2026 02 10 Agentcoding's dependency tree.
  3. Beoordeling permissions — Understand what access 2026 02 10 Agentcoding requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run 2026 02 10 Agentcoding in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=2026-02-10-AgentCoding
  6. Bekijk de license — Confirm that 2026 02 10 Agentcoding's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses beveiliging concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with 2026 02 10 Agentcoding

When evaluating whether 2026 02 10 Agentcoding is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how 2026 02 10 Agentcoding processes, stores, and transmits your data. Bekijk de tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency beveiliging

Check 2026 02 10 Agentcoding's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher beveiliging risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to 2026 02 10 Agentcoding. Beveiliging patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If 2026 02 10 Agentcoding connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP naleving

Verify that 2026 02 10 Agentcoding's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using 2026 02 10 Agentcoding in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

2026 02 10 Agentcoding and the EU AI Act

2026 02 10 Agentcoding is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.

Nerq's naleving assessment covers 52 jurisdicties worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal naleving.

Best Practices for Using 2026 02 10 Agentcoding Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from 2026 02 10 Agentcoding while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how 2026 02 10 Agentcoding is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and naleving with your beveiliging policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure 2026 02 10 Agentcoding and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from beveiliging patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant 2026 02 10 Agentcoding only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for beveiliging advisories

Subscribe to 2026 02 10 Agentcoding's beveiliging advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how 2026 02 10 Agentcoding is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

Situations That Warrant Independent Review of 2026 02 10 Agentcoding

Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate 2026 02 10 Agentcoding's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:

For each situation, compare 2026 02 10 Agentcoding's measured trust score of 62.2/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether 2026 02 10 Agentcoding is suitable for any particular use.

How 2026 02 10 Agentcoding Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among coding tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. 2026 02 10 Agentcoding's score of 62.2/100 is above the category average of 62/100.

This positions 2026 02 10 Agentcoding favorably among coding tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimensies.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks matig in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors 2026 02 10 Agentcoding and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or onderhoud patterns change, 2026 02 10 Agentcoding's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to beveiliging and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced onderhoud, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track 2026 02 10 Agentcoding's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=2026-02-10-AgentCoding&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — beveiliging, onderhoud, documentatie, naleving, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of 2026 02 10 Agentcoding are strengthening or weakening over time.

2026 02 10 Agentcoding vs Alternatieven

In the coding category, 2026 02 10 Agentcoding scores 62.2/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:

Belangrijkste conclusies

Veelgestelde vragen

Is 2026 02 10 Agentcoding veilig?
2026-02-10-AgentCoding met een Nerq Vertrouwensscore van 62.2/100 (C). Sterkste signaal: naleving (100/100). Score gebaseerd op Beveiliging (0/100), Onderhoud (1/100), Populariteit (0/100), Documentatie (0/100).
Wat is de vertrouwensscore van 2026 02 10 Agentcoding?
2026-02-10-AgentCoding: 62.2/100 (C). Score gebaseerd op Beveiliging (0/100), Onderhoud (1/100), Populariteit (0/100), Documentatie (0/100). Compliance: 100/100. Scores worden bijgewerkt wanneer nieuwe data beschikbaar komen. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=2026-02-10-AgentCoding
Wat zijn veiligere alternatieven voor 2026 02 10 Agentcoding?
In de categorie Coding, higher-rated alternatives include Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT (65/100), ollama/ollama (64/100), langchain-ai/langchain (77/100). 2026-02-10-AgentCoding scores 62.2/100.
Hoe vaak wordt de beveiligingsscore van 2026 02 10 Agentcoding bijgewerkt?
Nerq recomputes 2026 02 10 Agentcoding's trust score as new data becomes available. Current: 62.2/100 (C). API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=2026-02-10-AgentCoding
Kan ik 2026 02 10 Agentcoding gebruiken in een gereguleerde omgeving?
2026 02 10 Agentcoding: 62.2/100 (C). Compliance: 52 of 52 jurisdicties. EU AI Act compliant. Evaluate against your own regulatory requirements.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Zie ook

Disclaimer: Nerq-vertrouwensscores zijn geautomatiseerde beoordelingen op basis van openbaar beschikbare signalen. Ze vormen geen aanbeveling of garantie. Voer altijd uw eigen verificatie uit.

We gebruiken cookies voor analyse en caching. Privacy