Is Agenticapkflow veilig?

Agenticapkflow — Nerq Trust Score 54.1/100 (D-beoordeling). Score gebaseerd op 5 independent trust signals.

Agenticapkflow is een software tool met een Nerq Vertrouwensscore van 54.1/100 (D), based on 5 onafhankelijke gegevensdimensies. Beveiliging: 0/100. Onderhoud: 1/100. Populariteit: 0/100. Gegevens afkomstig van meerdere openbare bronnen waaronder pakketregisters, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev en OpenSSF Scorecard. Laatst bijgewerkt: n/a. Machineleesbare gegevens (JSON).

Is Agenticapkflow veilig?

Vertrouwensscore details — Agenticapkflow has a Nerq Trust Score of 54.1/100 (D). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.

Beveiligingsanalyse → Agenticapkflow Privacyrapport →

Wat is de vertrouwensscore van Agenticapkflow?

Agenticapkflow heeft een Nerq Trust Score van 54.1/100 met het cijfer D. Deze score is gebaseerd op 5 onafhankelijk gemeten dimensies, waaronder beveiliging, onderhoud en community-adoptie.

Beveiliging
0
Naleving
97
Onderhoud
1
Documentatie
0
Populariteit
0

Wat zijn de belangrijkste beveiligingsbevindingen voor Agenticapkflow?

Het sterkste signaal van Agenticapkflow is naleving met 97/100. Er zijn geen bekende kwetsbaarheden gedetecteerd.

⚠Beveiligingsscore: 0/100 (zwak)
⚠Onderhoud: 1/100 — lage onderhoudsactiviteit
⚠Naleving: 97/100 — covers 50 of 52 jurisdicties
⚠Documentatie: 0/100 — beperkte documentatie
⚠Populariteit: 0/100 — gemeenschapsacceptatie

Wat is Agenticapkflow en wie onderhoudt het?

OntwikkelaarELANSARI05
CategorieBeveiliging
Bronhttps://github.com/ELANSARI05/AgenticAPKFlow

Naleving van regelgeving

EU AI Act Risk ClassMINIMAL
Compliance Score97/100
JurisdictionsAssessed across 52 jurisdicties

Populaire alternatieven in beveiliging

bee-san/Ciphey
63.4/100 · C
github
usestrix/strix
64.4/100 · C
github
SWE-agent/SWE-agent
76.9/100 · B
github
promptfoo/promptfoo
82.0/100 · A
github
TecharoHQ/anubis
62.9/100 · C
github

What Is Agenticapkflow?

Agenticapkflow is a beveiliging tool: An autonomous agentic workflow for analyzing Android APKs to identify vulnerabilities and malware behaviors using LLM reasoning.. Nerq Trust Score: 54/100 (D).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including beveiliging vulnerabilities, onderhoud activity, license naleving, and gemeenschapsacceptatie.

How Nerq Assesses Agenticapkflow's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensies. Here is how Agenticapkflow performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 54.1/100 (D) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.

Who Typically Evaluates Agenticapkflow?

Agenticapkflow is commonly evaluated by:

How to read the signals: Agenticapkflow's measured signals (beveiliging 0/100, onderhoud 1/100, documentatie 0/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.

How to Verify Agenticapkflow's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — Bekijk de repository's beveiliging policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active onderhoud.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Agenticapkflow's dependency tree.
  3. Beoordeling permissions — Understand what access Agenticapkflow requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Agenticapkflow in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=AgenticAPKFlow
  6. Bekijk de license — Confirm that Agenticapkflow's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses beveiliging concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Agenticapkflow

When evaluating whether Agenticapkflow is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Agenticapkflow processes, stores, and transmits your data. Bekijk de tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency beveiliging

Check Agenticapkflow's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher beveiliging risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Agenticapkflow. Beveiliging patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Agenticapkflow connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP naleving

Verify that Agenticapkflow's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Agenticapkflow in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Agenticapkflow and the EU AI Act

Agenticapkflow is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.

Nerq's naleving assessment covers 52 jurisdicties worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal naleving.

Best Practices for Using Agenticapkflow Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Agenticapkflow while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Agenticapkflow is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and naleving with your beveiliging policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Agenticapkflow and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from beveiliging patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Agenticapkflow only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for beveiliging advisories

Subscribe to Agenticapkflow's beveiliging advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Agenticapkflow is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Agenticapkflow

Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Agenticapkflow's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:

For each situation, compare Agenticapkflow's measured trust score of 54.1/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Agenticapkflow is suitable for any particular use.

How Agenticapkflow Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among beveiliging tools, the average Trust Score is 67/100. Agenticapkflow's score of 54.1/100 is below the category average of 67/100.

This suggests that Agenticapkflow trails behind many comparable beveiliging tools. Organizations with strict beveiliging requirements should evaluate whether higher-scoring alternatives better meet their needs.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks matig in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Agenticapkflow and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or onderhoud patterns change, Agenticapkflow's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to beveiliging and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced onderhoud, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Agenticapkflow's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=AgenticAPKFlow&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — beveiliging, onderhoud, documentatie, naleving, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Agenticapkflow are strengthening or weakening over time.

Agenticapkflow vs Alternatieven

In the beveiliging category, Agenticapkflow scores 54.1/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:

Belangrijkste conclusies

Veelgestelde vragen

Is Agenticapkflow veilig?
AgenticAPKFlow met een Nerq Vertrouwensscore van 54.1/100 (D). Sterkste signaal: naleving (97/100). Score gebaseerd op Beveiliging (0/100), Onderhoud (1/100), Populariteit (0/100), Documentatie (0/100).
Wat is de vertrouwensscore van Agenticapkflow?
AgenticAPKFlow: 54.1/100 (D). Score gebaseerd op Beveiliging (0/100), Onderhoud (1/100), Populariteit (0/100), Documentatie (0/100). Compliance: 97/100. Scores worden bijgewerkt wanneer nieuwe data beschikbaar komen. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=AgenticAPKFlow
Wat zijn veiligere alternatieven voor Agenticapkflow?
In de categorie Beveiliging, higher-rated alternatives include bee-san/Ciphey (63/100), usestrix/strix (64/100), SWE-agent/SWE-agent (77/100). AgenticAPKFlow scores 54.1/100.
Hoe vaak wordt de beveiligingsscore van Agenticapkflow bijgewerkt?
Nerq recomputes Agenticapkflow's trust score as new data becomes available. Current: 54.1/100 (D). API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=AgenticAPKFlow
Kan ik Agenticapkflow gebruiken in een gereguleerde omgeving?
Agenticapkflow: 54.1/100 (D). Compliance: 50 of 52 jurisdicties. EU AI Act compliant. Evaluate against your own regulatory requirements.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Zie ook

Disclaimer: Nerq-vertrouwensscores zijn geautomatiseerde beoordelingen op basis van openbaar beschikbare signalen. Ze vormen geen aanbeveling of garantie. Voer altijd uw eigen verificatie uit.

We gebruiken cookies voor analyse en caching. Privacy