Er Agent Coordinator trygt?
Agent Coordinator — Nerq Trust Score 64.7/100 (Karakter C). Poeng basert på 5 independent trust signals.
Agent Coordinator er en software tool har en Nerq-tillitspoeng på 64.7/100 (C), based on 5 uavhengige datadimensjoner. Sikkerhet: 0/100. Vedlikehold: 1/100. Popularitet: 0/100. Data hentet fra flere offentlige kilder inkludert pakkeregistre, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev og OpenSSF Scorecard. Sist oppdatert: n/a. Maskinlesbare data (JSON).
Er Agent Coordinator trygt?
Tillitspoeng detaljer — Agent Coordinator har en Nerq-tillitspoeng på 64.7/100 (C). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.
Hva er tillitspoengene til Agent Coordinator?
Agent Coordinator har en Nerq-tillitspoeng på 64.7/100 med karakteren C. Denne poengsummen er basert på 5 uavhengig målte dimensjoner, inkludert sikkerhet, vedlikehold og samfunnsadopsjon.
Hva er de viktigste sikkerhetsfunnene for Agent Coordinator?
Agent Coordinators sterkeste signal er samsvar på 100/100. Ingen kjente sårbarheter er funnet.
Hva er Agent Coordinator og hvem vedlikeholder det?
| Utvikler | ryan-haver |
| Kategori | Agent Platform |
| Kilde | https://github.com/ryan-haver/agent-coordinator |
| Frameworks | anthropic |
| Protocols | mcp · rest |
Regulatorisk samsvar
| EU AI Act Risk Class | Not assessed |
| Compliance Score | 100/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Populære alternativer i agent platform
What Is Agent Coordinator?
Agent Coordinator is a software tool in the agent platform category: Unified Agent Coordination System for managing multiple AI agents and models.. Nerq Trust Score: 65/100 (C).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including sikkerhet vulnerabilities, vedlikehold activity, license samsvar, and fellesskapsadopsjon.
How Nerq Assesses Agent Coordinator's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensjoner. Here is how Agent Coordinator performs in each:
- Sikkerhet (0/100): Agent Coordinator's sikkerhet posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, sikkerhet policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Vedlikehold (1/100): Agent Coordinator is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API dokumentasjon, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (100/100): Agent Coordinator is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Basert på GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 64.7/100 (C) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.
Who Typically Evaluates Agent Coordinator?
Agent Coordinator is commonly evaluated by:
- Developers and teams working with agent platform tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
How to read the signals: Agent Coordinator's measured signals (sikkerhet 0/100, vedlikehold 1/100, dokumentasjon 1/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.
How to Verify Agent Coordinator's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Gjennomgå repository's sikkerhet policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active vedlikehold.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for kjente sårbarheter in Agent Coordinator's dependency tree. - Anmeldelse permissions — Understand what access Agent Coordinator requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Agent Coordinator in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=agent-coordinator - Gjennomgå license — Confirm that Agent Coordinator's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses sikkerhet concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Agent Coordinator
When evaluating whether Agent Coordinator is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Agent Coordinator processes, stores, and transmits your data. Gjennomgå tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Agent Coordinator's dependency tree for kjente sårbarheter. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher sikkerhet risk.
Regularly check for updates to Agent Coordinator. Sikkerhet patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Agent Coordinator connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Agent Coordinator's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Agent Coordinator in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Best Practices for Using Agent Coordinator Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Agent Coordinator while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Agent Coordinator is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and samsvar with your sikkerhet policies.
Ensure Agent Coordinator and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from sikkerhet patches.
Grant Agent Coordinator only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Agent Coordinator's sikkerhet advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Agent Coordinator is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Agent Coordinator
Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Agent Coordinator's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:
- Environments handling sensitive or regulated data (healthcare, finance, government)
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
- Deployments with strict regulatory requirements that must be independently validated
For each situation, compare Agent Coordinator's measured trust score of 64.7/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Agent Coordinator is suitable for any particular use.
How Agent Coordinator Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among agent platform tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Agent Coordinator's score of 64.7/100 is above the category average of 62/100.
This positions Agent Coordinator favorably among agent platform tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimensjoner.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderat in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Agent Coordinator and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or vedlikehold patterns change, Agent Coordinator's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to sikkerhet and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced vedlikehold, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Agent Coordinator's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=agent-coordinator&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — sikkerhet, vedlikehold, dokumentasjon, samsvar, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Agent Coordinator are strengthening or weakening over time.
Agent Coordinator vs Alternativer
In the agent platform category, Agent Coordinator scores 64.7/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Agent Coordinator vs agentic — Trust Score: 68.6/100
- Agent Coordinator vs intentkit — Trust Score: 73.5/100
- Agent Coordinator vs coze-loop — Trust Score: 69.7/100
Viktigste punkter
- Agent Coordinator has a measured Nerq Trust Score of 64.7/100 (C) — a composite of independent signals, not a suitability judgment.
- Among agent platform tools, Agent Coordinator scores above the category average of 62/100 (a positional measurement relative to peers).
- The individual signals — sikkerhet, vedlikehold, dokumentasjon, samsvar, community — are shown above. Weigh them against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via Nerq's Preflight API.
Ofte stilte spørsmål
Er Agent Coordinator trygt?
Hva er tillitspoengene til Agent Coordinator?
Hva er tryggere alternativer til Agent Coordinator?
Hvor ofte oppdateres Agent Coordinators sikkerhetspoeng?
Kan jeg bruke Agent Coordinator i et regulert miljø?
Se også
Disclaimer: Nerqs tillitspoeng er automatiserte vurderinger basert på offentlig tilgjengelige signaler. De utgjør ikke anbefalinger eller garantier. Utfør alltid din egen verifisering.