Er Opencode Solomemory trygt?
Opencode Solomemory — Nerq Trust Score 70.5/100 (Karakter B). Basert på analyse av 5 tillidsdimensjoner vurderes det som generelt trygt men med visse bekymringer. Sist oppdatert: 2026-04-07.
Ja, Opencode Solomemory er trygt å bruke. Opencode Solomemory er en software tool har en Nerq-tillitspoeng på 70.5/100 (B), based on 5 uavhengige datadimensjoner. Anbefalt for bruk. Sikkerhet: 0/100. Vedlikehold: 1/100. Popularitet: 0/100. Data hentet fra flere offentlige kilder inkludert pakkeregistre, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev og OpenSSF Scorecard. Sist oppdatert: 2026-04-07. Maskinlesbare data (JSON).
Er Opencode Solomemory trygt?
YES — Opencode Solomemory har en Nerq-tillitspoeng på 70.5/100 (B). Oppfyller Nerqs tillitsterskel med sterke signaler innen sikkerhet, vedlikehold og fellesskapsadopsjon. Anbefalt for bruk — gjennomgå den fullstendige rapporten nedenfor for spesifikke hensyn.
Hva er tillitspoengene til Opencode Solomemory?
Opencode Solomemory har en Nerq-tillitspoeng på 70.5/100 med karakteren B. Denne poengsummen er basert på 5 uavhengig målte dimensjoner, inkludert sikkerhet, vedlikehold og samfunnsadopsjon.
Hva er de viktigste sikkerhetsfunnene for Opencode Solomemory?
Opencode Solomemorys sterkeste signal er samsvar på 100/100. Ingen kjente sårbarheter er funnet. It meets the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.
Hva er Opencode Solomemory og hvem vedlikeholder det?
| Utvikler | solomemory-ai |
| Kategori | Coding |
| Kilde | https://github.com/solomemory-ai/opencode-solomemory |
| Protocols | rest |
Regulatorisk samsvar
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 100/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Populære alternativer i coding
What Is Opencode Solomemory?
Opencode Solomemory is a software tool in the coding category: Solo Memory for OpenCode provides persistent memory across coding sessions and projects.. Nerq Trust Score: 70/100 (B).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including sikkerhet vulnerabilities, vedlikehold activity, license samsvar, and fellesskapsadopsjon.
How Nerq Assesses Opencode Solomemory's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensjoner. Here is how Opencode Solomemory performs in each:
- Sikkerhet (0/100): Opencode Solomemory's sikkerhet posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, sikkerhet policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Vedlikehold (1/100): Opencode Solomemory is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API dokumentasjon, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (100/100): Opencode Solomemory is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Basert på GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 70.5/100 (B) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This exceeds the Nerq Verified threshold of 70, indicating the tool meets our standards for production use.
Who Should Use Opencode Solomemory?
Opencode Solomemory is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with coding tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Opencode Solomemory meets the minimum threshold for production use, but we recommend monitoring for sikkerhet advisories and keeping dependencies up to date. Consider implementing additional guardrails for sensitive workloads.
How to Verify Opencode Solomemory's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Gjennomgå repository's sikkerhet policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active vedlikehold.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for kjente sårbarheter in Opencode Solomemory's dependency tree. - Anmeldelse permissions — Understand what access Opencode Solomemory requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Opencode Solomemory in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=opencode-solomemory - Gjennomgå license — Confirm that Opencode Solomemory's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses sikkerhet concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Opencode Solomemory
When evaluating whether Opencode Solomemory is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Opencode Solomemory processes, stores, and transmits your data. Gjennomgå tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Opencode Solomemory's dependency tree for kjente sårbarheter. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher sikkerhet risk.
Regularly check for updates to Opencode Solomemory. Sikkerhet patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Opencode Solomemory connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Opencode Solomemory's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Opencode Solomemory in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Opencode Solomemory and the EU AI Act
Opencode Solomemory is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's samsvar assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal samsvar.
Best Practices for Using Opencode Solomemory Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Opencode Solomemory while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Opencode Solomemory is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and samsvar with your sikkerhet policies.
Ensure Opencode Solomemory and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from sikkerhet patches.
Grant Opencode Solomemory only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Opencode Solomemory's sikkerhet advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Opencode Solomemory is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Opencode Solomemory?
Even well-trusted tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Opencode Solomemory in these scenarios:
- Scenarios where Opencode Solomemory's specific capabilities exceed your actual needs — simpler tools may be safer
- Air-gapped environments where the tool cannot receive sikkerhet updates
- Projects with strict regulatory requirements that haven't been explicitly validated
For each scenario, evaluate whether Opencode Solomemory's trust score of 70.5/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. The Nerq Verified status indicates general production readiness, but sector-specific requirements may apply.
How Opencode Solomemory Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among coding tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Opencode Solomemory's score of 70.5/100 is above the category average of 62/100.
This positions Opencode Solomemory favorably among coding tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimensjoner.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderat in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Opencode Solomemory and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or vedlikehold patterns change, Opencode Solomemory's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to sikkerhet and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced vedlikehold, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Opencode Solomemory's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=opencode-solomemory&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — sikkerhet, vedlikehold, dokumentasjon, samsvar, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Opencode Solomemory are strengthening or weakening over time.
Opencode Solomemory vs Alternativer
In the coding category, Opencode Solomemory scores 70.5/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Opencode Solomemory vs AutoGPT — Trust Score: 74.7/100
- Opencode Solomemory vs ollama — Trust Score: 73.8/100
- Opencode Solomemory vs langchain — Trust Score: 86.4/100
Viktigste punkter
- Opencode Solomemory has a Trust Score of 70.5/100 (B) and is Nerq Verified.
- Opencode Solomemory meets the minimum threshold for production deployment, though monitoring and additional guardrails are recommended.
- Among coding tools, Opencode Solomemory scores above the category average of 62/100, demonstrating above-average reliability.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Ofte stilte spørsmål
Er Opencode Solomemory trygt?
Hva er tillitspoengene til Opencode Solomemory?
Hva er tryggere alternativer til Opencode Solomemory?
Hvor ofte oppdateres Opencode Solomemorys sikkerhetspoeng?
Kan jeg bruke Opencode Solomemory i et regulert miljø?
Se også
Disclaimer: Nerqs tillitspoeng er automatiserte vurderinger basert på offentlig tilgjengelige signaler. De utgjør ikke anbefalinger eller garantier. Utfør alltid din egen verifisering.