Er Dify trygt?
Dify — Nerq Trust Score 76.0/100 (Karakter B+). Basert på analyse av 5 tillidsdimensjoner vurderes det som generelt trygt men med visse bekymringer. Sist oppdatert: 2026-04-25.
Ja, Dify er trygt å bruke. Dify er en software tool har en Nerq-tillitspoeng på 76.0/100 (B+), based on 5 uavhengige datadimensjoner. Anbefalt for bruk. Sikkerhet: 1/100. Vedlikehold: 1/100. Popularitet: 1/100. Data hentet fra flere offentlige kilder inkludert pakkeregistre, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev og OpenSSF Scorecard. Sist oppdatert: 2026-04-25. Maskinlesbare data (JSON).
Er Dify trygt?
YES — Dify har en Nerq-tillitspoeng på 76.0/100 (B+). Oppfyller Nerqs tillitsterskel med sterke signaler innen sikkerhet, vedlikehold og fellesskapsadopsjon. Anbefalt for bruk — gjennomgå den fullstendige rapporten nedenfor for spesifikke hensyn.
Hva er tillitspoengene til Dify?
Dify har en Nerq-tillitspoeng på 76.0/100 med karakteren B+. Denne poengsummen er basert på 5 uavhengig målte dimensjoner, inkludert sikkerhet, vedlikehold og samfunnsadopsjon.
Hva er de viktigste sikkerhetsfunnene for Dify?
Difys sterkeste signal er samsvar på 100/100. Ingen kjente sårbarheter er funnet. It meets the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.
Hva er Dify og hvem vedlikeholder det?
| Utvikler | langgenius |
| Kategori | Infrastructure |
| Stjerner | 130,751 |
| Kilde | https://github.com/langgenius/dify |
| Frameworks | openai |
| Protocols | rest |
Regulatorisk samsvar
| EU AI Act Risk Class | Not assessed |
| Compliance Score | 100/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Populære alternativer i infrastructure
Deep Analysis: langgenius/dify
Executive Summary
langgenius/dify is a infrastructure tool med et Nerq-tillitspoeng på 65.5/100 (B-). No kjente sårbarheter. 130,751 GitHub stars. Production-ready platform for agentic workflow development.
Sikkerhet
No known CVEs. langgenius/dify has a clean sikkerhet record in the Nerq database.
Vedlikehold Health
- GitHub stars: 130,751
- Activity score: 1/100
Ecosystem Position
- Compatible frameworks: mistral, openai
Cost Analysis
- Pricing: open_source_free — Free
- Free tier: Unlimited (self-hosted)
- Pricing: usage_based — Free
- Free tier: 200 GPT-4 calls
- Pricing: usage_based — $59.00/mo
- Cost per code_review: $0.0300
- Cost per code_generation: $0.0450
- Cost per chat_response: $0.0075
- Cost per document_analysis: $0.0450
- Cost per data_extraction: $0.0225
Tillitspoeng detaljer
Strongest: Compliance (100/100). Weakest: Sikkerhet (1/100).
How to Improve This Score
Ofte stilte spørsmål
Er dify safe to use in production?
Caution advised. dify har en Nerq-tillitspoeng på 65.5/100 (B-). This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. Consider alternatives or perform additional due diligence.
Does dify have any kjente sårbarheter?
As of April 2026, dify has no known CVEs in the Nerq database.
What license does dify use?
License information is not yet available in the Nerq database.
How does dify compare to alternatives?
In the infrastructure category, dify scores 65.5/100. Use the Nerq comparison API to compare directly: curl nerq.ai/v1/compare/dify/vs/[alternative]
How often is dify updated?
Check the vedlikehold health section above for the latest activity data. Nerq tracks commit frequency, release cadence, and issue response times.
What Is Dify?
Dify is a software tool in the infrastructure category: Production-ready platform for agentic workflow development.. It has 130,751 GitHub stars. Nerq Trust Score: 66/100 (B-).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including sikkerhet vulnerabilities, vedlikehold activity, license samsvar, and fellesskapsadopsjon.
How Nerq Assesses Dify's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensjoner. Here is how Dify performs in each:
- Sikkerhet (1/100): Dify's sikkerhet posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, sikkerhet policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Vedlikehold (1/100): Dify is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API dokumentasjon, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (100/100): Dify is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (1/100): Community adoption is limited. Basert på GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 65.5/100 (B-) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.
Who Should Use Dify?
Dify is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with infrastructure tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Dify is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its sikkerhet posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.
How to Verify Dify's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Gjennomgå repository's sikkerhet policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active vedlikehold.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for kjente sårbarheter in Dify's dependency tree. - Anmeldelse permissions — Understand what access Dify requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Dify in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=langgenius/dify - Gjennomgå license — Confirm that Dify's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses sikkerhet concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Dify
When evaluating whether Dify is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Dify processes, stores, and transmits your data. Gjennomgå tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Dify's dependency tree for kjente sårbarheter. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher sikkerhet risk.
Regularly check for updates to Dify. Sikkerhet patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Dify connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Dify's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Dify in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Best Practices for Using Dify Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Dify while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Dify is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and samsvar with your sikkerhet policies.
Ensure Dify and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from sikkerhet patches.
Grant Dify only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Dify's sikkerhet advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Dify is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Dify?
Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Dify in these scenarios:
- Production environments handling sensitive customer data
- Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) without additional samsvar review
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
For each scenario, evaluate whether Dify's trust score of 65.5/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual sikkerhet assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.
How Dify Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among infrastructure tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Dify's score of 65.5/100 is above the category average of 62/100.
This positions Dify favorably among infrastructure tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimensjoner.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderat in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Dify and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or vedlikehold patterns change, Dify's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to sikkerhet and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced vedlikehold, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Dify's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=langgenius/dify&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — sikkerhet, vedlikehold, dokumentasjon, samsvar, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Dify are strengthening or weakening over time.
Dify vs Alternativer
In the infrastructure category, Dify scores 65.5/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Dify vs n8n — Trust Score: 52.2/100
- Dify vs langflow — Trust Score: 66.1/100
- Dify vs open-webui — Trust Score: 74.8/100
Viktigste punkter
- Dify has a Trust Score of 65.5/100 (B-) and is not yet Nerq Verified.
- Dify shows moderat trust signals. Conduct thorough due diligence before deploying to production environments.
- Among infrastructure tools, Dify scores above the category average of 62/100, demonstrating above-average reliability.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Detaljert poenganalyse
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Sikkerhet | 1/100 |
| Vedlikehold | 1/100 |
| Popularitet | 1/100 |
Basert på 3 dimensjoner. Data from flere offentlige kilder inkludert pakkeregistre, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev og OpenSSF Scorecard.
Hvilke data samler Dify inn?
Personvern assessment for Dify is not yet available. See our methodology for how Nerq measures privacy, or the public privacy review for any community-contributed notes.
Er Dify sikkert?
Sikkerhet score: 1/100. Review sikkerhet practices and consider alternatives with higher sikkerhet scores for sensitive use cases.
Nerq overvåker denne enheten mot NVD, OSV.dev og registerspesifikke sårbarhetsdatabaser for løpende sikkerhetsvurdering.
Full analyse: Dify sikkerhetsrapport
Slik beregnet vi denne poengsummen
Dify's trust score of 76.0/100 (B+) beregnes fra flere offentlige kilder inkludert pakkeregistre, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev og OpenSSF Scorecard. Poengsummen gjenspeiler 3 uavhengige dimensjoner: sikkerhet (1/100), vedlikehold (1/100), popularitet (1/100). Hver dimensjon vektes likt for å produsere det samlede tillitspoenget.
Nerq analyserer over 7,5 millioner enheter i 26 registre med samme metodikk, noe som muliggjør direkte sammenligning mellom enheter. Poeng oppdateres fortløpende etter hvert som nye data blir tilgjengelige.
Denne siden ble sist gjennomgått den April 25, 2026. Dataversjon: 1.0.
Ofte stilte spørsmål
Er Dify trygt?
Hva er tillitspoengene til Dify?
Hva er tryggere alternativer til Dify?
Hvor ofte oppdateres Difys sikkerhetspoeng?
Kan jeg bruke Dify i et regulert miljø?
Se også
Disclaimer: Nerqs tillitspoeng er automatiserte vurderinger basert på offentlig tilgjengelige signaler. De utgjør ikke anbefalinger eller garantier. Utfør alltid din egen verifisering.