Er Microagent trygt?
Microagent — Nerq Trust Score 59.8/100 (Karakter D). Basert på analyse av 5 tillidsdimensjoner vurderes det som har merkbare sikkerhetsproblemer. Sist oppdatert: 2026-04-10.
Bruk Microagent med forsiktighet. Microagent er en software tool har en Nerq-tillitspoeng på 59.8/100 (D), based on 5 uavhengige datadimensjoner. Under Nerqs verifiserte terskel Sikkerhet: 0/100. Vedlikehold: 1/100. Popularitet: 0/100. Data hentet fra flere offentlige kilder inkludert pakkeregistre, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev og OpenSSF Scorecard. Sist oppdatert: 2026-04-10. Maskinlesbare data (JSON).
Er Microagent trygt?
CAUTION — Microagent har en Nerq-tillitspoeng på 59.8/100 (D). Har moderat tillitssignaler, men viser noen bekymringsområder that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review sikkerhet and vedlikehold signals before production deployment.
Hva er tillitspoengene til Microagent?
Microagent har en Nerq-tillitspoeng på 59.8/100 med karakteren D. Denne poengsummen er basert på 5 uavhengig målte dimensjoner, inkludert sikkerhet, vedlikehold og samfunnsadopsjon.
Hva er de viktigste sikkerhetsfunnene for Microagent?
Microagents sterkeste signal er samsvar på 87/100. Ingen kjente sårbarheter er funnet. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.
Hva er Microagent og hvem vedlikeholder det?
| Utvikler | MicroAgent-dev |
| Kategori | Other |
| Kilde | https://github.com/MicroAgent-dev/MicroAgent |
Regulatorisk samsvar
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 87/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Populære alternativer i other
What Is Microagent?
Microagent is a software tool in the other category: Ultra-Lightweight and Low token-cost Personal AI Assistant. Nerq Trust Score: 60/100 (D).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including sikkerhet vulnerabilities, vedlikehold activity, license samsvar, and fellesskapsadopsjon.
How Nerq Assesses Microagent's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensjoner. Here is how Microagent performs in each:
- Sikkerhet (0/100): Microagent's sikkerhet posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, sikkerhet policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Vedlikehold (1/100): Microagent is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (0/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API dokumentasjon, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (87/100): Microagent is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Basert på GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 59.8/100 (D) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.
Who Should Use Microagent?
Microagent is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with other tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Microagent is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its sikkerhet posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.
How to Verify Microagent's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Gjennomgå repository's sikkerhet policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active vedlikehold.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for kjente sårbarheter in Microagent's dependency tree. - Anmeldelse permissions — Understand what access Microagent requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Microagent in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=MicroAgent - Gjennomgå license — Confirm that Microagent's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses sikkerhet concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Microagent
When evaluating whether Microagent is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Microagent processes, stores, and transmits your data. Gjennomgå tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Microagent's dependency tree for kjente sårbarheter. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher sikkerhet risk.
Regularly check for updates to Microagent. Sikkerhet patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Microagent connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Microagent's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Microagent in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Microagent and the EU AI Act
Microagent is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's samsvar assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal samsvar.
Best Practices for Using Microagent Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Microagent while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Microagent is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and samsvar with your sikkerhet policies.
Ensure Microagent and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from sikkerhet patches.
Grant Microagent only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Microagent's sikkerhet advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Microagent is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Microagent?
Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Microagent in these scenarios:
- Production environments handling sensitive customer data
- Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) without additional samsvar review
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
For each scenario, evaluate whether Microagent's trust score of 59.8/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual sikkerhet assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.
How Microagent Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among other tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Microagent's score of 59.8/100 is near the category average of 62/100.
This places Microagent in line with the typical other tool tool. It meets baseline expectations but does not distinguish itself from peers on trust metrics.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderat in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Microagent and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or vedlikehold patterns change, Microagent's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to sikkerhet and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced vedlikehold, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Microagent's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=MicroAgent&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — sikkerhet, vedlikehold, dokumentasjon, samsvar, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Microagent are strengthening or weakening over time.
Microagent vs Alternativer
In the other category, Microagent scores 59.8/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Microagent vs cs-video-courses — Trust Score: 69.3/100
- Microagent vs awesome-scalability — Trust Score: 71.8/100
- Microagent vs superpowers — Trust Score: 71.8/100
Viktigste punkter
- Microagent has a Trust Score of 59.8/100 (D) and is not yet Nerq Verified.
- Microagent shows moderat trust signals. Conduct thorough due diligence before deploying to production environments.
- Among other tools, Microagent scores near the category average of 62/100, suggesting room for improvement relative to peers.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Ofte stilte spørsmål
Er Microagent trygt?
Hva er tillitspoengene til Microagent?
Hva er tryggere alternativer til Microagent?
Hvor ofte oppdateres Microagents sikkerhetspoeng?
Kan jeg bruke Microagent i et regulert miljø?
Se også
Disclaimer: Nerqs tillitspoeng er automatiserte vurderinger basert på offentlig tilgjengelige signaler. De utgjør ikke anbefalinger eller garantier. Utfør alltid din egen verifisering.