Er Floor Dashboard trygt?
Floor Dashboard — Nerq Trust Score 47.2/100 (Karakter D). Poeng basert på 5 independent trust signals.
Floor Dashboard er en software tool har en Nerq-tillitspoeng på 47.2/100 (D), based on 5 uavhengige datadimensjoner. Sikkerhet: 0/100. Vedlikehold: 1/100. Popularitet: 0/100. Data hentet fra flere offentlige kilder inkludert pakkeregistre, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev og OpenSSF Scorecard. Sist oppdatert: n/a. Maskinlesbare data (JSON).
Er Floor Dashboard trygt?
Tillitspoeng detaljer — Floor Dashboard har en Nerq-tillitspoeng på 47.2/100 (D). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.
Hva er tillitspoengene til Floor Dashboard?
Floor Dashboard har en Nerq-tillitspoeng på 47.2/100 med karakteren D. Denne poengsummen er basert på 5 uavhengig målte dimensjoner, inkludert sikkerhet, vedlikehold og samfunnsadopsjon.
Hva er de viktigste sikkerhetsfunnene for Floor Dashboard?
Floor Dashboards sterkeste signal er samsvar på 96/100. Ingen kjente sårbarheter er funnet.
Hva er Floor Dashboard og hvem vedlikeholder det?
| Utvikler | thefloordev |
| Kategori | Infrastructure |
| Kilde | https://github.com/thefloordev/floor-dashboard |
| Protocols | rest |
Regulatorisk samsvar
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 96/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Populære alternativer i infrastructure
What Is Floor Dashboard?
Floor Dashboard is a software tool in the infrastructure category: A real-time ambient dashboard for OpenClaw, displaying system stats and network monitoring.. Nerq Trust Score: 47/100 (D).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including sikkerhet vulnerabilities, vedlikehold activity, license samsvar, and fellesskapsadopsjon.
How Nerq Assesses Floor Dashboard's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensjoner. Here is how Floor Dashboard performs in each:
- Sikkerhet (0/100): Floor Dashboard's sikkerhet posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, sikkerhet policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Vedlikehold (1/100): Floor Dashboard is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API dokumentasjon, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (96/100): Floor Dashboard is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Basert på GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 47.2/100 (D) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.
Who Typically Evaluates Floor Dashboard?
Floor Dashboard is commonly evaluated by:
- Developers and teams working with infrastructure tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
How to read the signals: Floor Dashboard's measured signals (sikkerhet 0/100, vedlikehold 1/100, dokumentasjon 1/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.
How to Verify Floor Dashboard's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Gjennomgå repository's sikkerhet policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active vedlikehold.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for kjente sårbarheter in Floor Dashboard's dependency tree. - Anmeldelse permissions — Understand what access Floor Dashboard requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Floor Dashboard in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=floor-dashboard - Gjennomgå license — Confirm that Floor Dashboard's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses sikkerhet concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Floor Dashboard
When evaluating whether Floor Dashboard is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Floor Dashboard processes, stores, and transmits your data. Gjennomgå tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Floor Dashboard's dependency tree for kjente sårbarheter. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher sikkerhet risk.
Regularly check for updates to Floor Dashboard. Sikkerhet patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Floor Dashboard connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Floor Dashboard's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Floor Dashboard in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Floor Dashboard and the EU AI Act
Floor Dashboard is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's samsvar assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal samsvar.
Best Practices for Using Floor Dashboard Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Floor Dashboard while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Floor Dashboard is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and samsvar with your sikkerhet policies.
Ensure Floor Dashboard and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from sikkerhet patches.
Grant Floor Dashboard only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Floor Dashboard's sikkerhet advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Floor Dashboard is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Floor Dashboard
Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Floor Dashboard's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:
- Environments handling sensitive or regulated data (healthcare, finance, government)
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
- Deployments with strict regulatory requirements that must be independently validated
For each situation, compare Floor Dashboard's measured trust score of 47.2/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Floor Dashboard is suitable for any particular use.
How Floor Dashboard Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among infrastructure tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Floor Dashboard's score of 47.2/100 is below the category average of 62/100.
This suggests that Floor Dashboard trails behind many comparable infrastructure tools. Organizations with strict sikkerhet requirements should evaluate whether higher-scoring alternatives better meet their needs.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderat in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Floor Dashboard and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or vedlikehold patterns change, Floor Dashboard's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to sikkerhet and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced vedlikehold, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Floor Dashboard's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=floor-dashboard&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — sikkerhet, vedlikehold, dokumentasjon, samsvar, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Floor Dashboard are strengthening or weakening over time.
Floor Dashboard vs Alternativer
In the infrastructure category, Floor Dashboard scores 47.2/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Floor Dashboard vs n8n — Trust Score: 69.1/100
- Floor Dashboard vs langflow — Trust Score: 77.0/100
- Floor Dashboard vs dify — Trust Score: 69.7/100
Viktigste punkter
- Floor Dashboard has a measured Nerq Trust Score of 47.2/100 (D) — a composite of independent signals, not a suitability judgment.
- Among infrastructure tools, Floor Dashboard scores below the category average of 62/100 (a positional measurement relative to peers).
- The individual signals — sikkerhet, vedlikehold, dokumentasjon, samsvar, community — are shown above. Weigh them against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via Nerq's Preflight API.
Ofte stilte spørsmål
Er Floor Dashboard trygt?
Hva er tillitspoengene til Floor Dashboard?
Hva er tryggere alternativer til Floor Dashboard?
Hvor ofte oppdateres Floor Dashboards sikkerhetspoeng?
Kan jeg bruke Floor Dashboard i et regulert miljø?
Se også
Disclaimer: Nerqs tillitspoeng er automatiserte vurderinger basert på offentlig tilgjengelige signaler. De utgjør ikke anbefalinger eller garantier. Utfør alltid din egen verifisering.