Er Neural Hive trygt?
Neural Hive — Nerq Trust Score 66.0/100 (Karakter C). Poeng basert på 5 independent trust signals.
Neural Hive er en software tool har en Nerq-tillitspoeng på 66.0/100 (C), based on 5 uavhengige datadimensjoner. Sikkerhet: 0/100. Vedlikehold: 1/100. Popularitet: 0/100. Data hentet fra flere offentlige kilder inkludert pakkeregistre, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev og OpenSSF Scorecard. Sist oppdatert: n/a. Maskinlesbare data (JSON).
Er Neural Hive trygt?
Tillitspoeng detaljer — Neural Hive har en Nerq-tillitspoeng på 66.0/100 (C). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.
Hva er tillitspoengene til Neural Hive?
Neural Hive har en Nerq-tillitspoeng på 66.0/100 med karakteren C. Denne poengsummen er basert på 5 uavhengig målte dimensjoner, inkludert sikkerhet, vedlikehold og samfunnsadopsjon.
Hva er de viktigste sikkerhetsfunnene for Neural Hive?
Neural Hives sterkeste signal er samsvar på 87/100. Ingen kjente sårbarheter er funnet.
Hva er Neural Hive og hvem vedlikeholder det?
| Utvikler | EdmondVirelle |
| Kategori | Coding |
| Kilde | https://github.com/EdmondVirelle/Neural-Hive |
| Frameworks | anthropic |
| Protocols | rest |
Regulatorisk samsvar
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 87/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Populære alternativer i coding
What Is Neural Hive?
Neural Hive is a software tool in the coding category: Neural-Hive is an AI Agent Cluster Command Center for managing multiple AI coding assistants.. Nerq Trust Score: 66/100 (C).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including sikkerhet vulnerabilities, vedlikehold activity, license samsvar, and fellesskapsadopsjon.
How Nerq Assesses Neural Hive's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensjoner. Here is how Neural Hive performs in each:
- Sikkerhet (0/100): Neural Hive's sikkerhet posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, sikkerhet policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Vedlikehold (1/100): Neural Hive is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API dokumentasjon, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (87/100): Neural Hive is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Basert på GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 66.0/100 (C) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.
Who Typically Evaluates Neural Hive?
Neural Hive is commonly evaluated by:
- Developers and teams working with coding tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
How to read the signals: Neural Hive's measured signals (sikkerhet 0/100, vedlikehold 1/100, dokumentasjon 1/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.
How to Verify Neural Hive's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Gjennomgå repository's sikkerhet policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active vedlikehold.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for kjente sårbarheter in Neural Hive's dependency tree. - Anmeldelse permissions — Understand what access Neural Hive requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Neural Hive in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Neural-Hive - Gjennomgå license — Confirm that Neural Hive's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses sikkerhet concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Neural Hive
When evaluating whether Neural Hive is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Neural Hive processes, stores, and transmits your data. Gjennomgå tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Neural Hive's dependency tree for kjente sårbarheter. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher sikkerhet risk.
Regularly check for updates to Neural Hive. Sikkerhet patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Neural Hive connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Neural Hive's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Neural Hive in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Neural Hive and the EU AI Act
Neural Hive is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's samsvar assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal samsvar.
Best Practices for Using Neural Hive Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Neural Hive while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Neural Hive is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and samsvar with your sikkerhet policies.
Ensure Neural Hive and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from sikkerhet patches.
Grant Neural Hive only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Neural Hive's sikkerhet advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Neural Hive is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Neural Hive
Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Neural Hive's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:
- Environments handling sensitive or regulated data (healthcare, finance, government)
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
- Deployments with strict regulatory requirements that must be independently validated
For each situation, compare Neural Hive's measured trust score of 66.0/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Neural Hive is suitable for any particular use.
How Neural Hive Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among coding tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Neural Hive's score of 66.0/100 is above the category average of 62/100.
This positions Neural Hive favorably among coding tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimensjoner.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderat in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Neural Hive and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or vedlikehold patterns change, Neural Hive's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to sikkerhet and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced vedlikehold, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Neural Hive's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Neural-Hive&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — sikkerhet, vedlikehold, dokumentasjon, samsvar, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Neural Hive are strengthening or weakening over time.
Neural Hive vs Alternativer
In the coding category, Neural Hive scores 66.0/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Neural Hive vs AutoGPT — Trust Score: 65.3/100
- Neural Hive vs ollama — Trust Score: 64.4/100
- Neural Hive vs langchain — Trust Score: 77.0/100
Viktigste punkter
- Neural Hive has a measured Nerq Trust Score of 66.0/100 (C) — a composite of independent signals, not a suitability judgment.
- Among coding tools, Neural Hive scores above the category average of 62/100 (a positional measurement relative to peers).
- The individual signals — sikkerhet, vedlikehold, dokumentasjon, samsvar, community — are shown above. Weigh them against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via Nerq's Preflight API.
Ofte stilte spørsmål
Er Neural Hive trygt?
Hva er tillitspoengene til Neural Hive?
Hva er tryggere alternativer til Neural Hive?
Hvor ofte oppdateres Neural Hives sikkerhetspoeng?
Kan jeg bruke Neural Hive i et regulert miljø?
Se også
Disclaimer: Nerqs tillitspoeng er automatiserte vurderinger basert på offentlig tilgjengelige signaler. De utgjør ikke anbefalinger eller garantier. Utfør alltid din egen verifisering.