Er Phate trygt?
Phate — Nerq Trust Score 66.1/100 (Karakter C). Basert på analyse av 5 tillidsdimensjoner vurderes det som generelt trygt men med visse bekymringer. Sist oppdatert: 2026-04-07.
Bruk Phate med forsiktighet. Phate er en software tool har en Nerq-tillitspoeng på 66.1/100 (C), based on 5 uavhengige datadimensjoner. Under Nerqs verifiserte terskel Sikkerhet: 0/100. Vedlikehold: 0/100. Popularitet: 0/100. Data hentet fra flere offentlige kilder inkludert pakkeregistre, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev og OpenSSF Scorecard. Sist oppdatert: 2026-04-07. Maskinlesbare data (JSON).
Er Phate trygt?
CAUTION — Phate har en Nerq-tillitspoeng på 66.1/100 (C). Har moderat tillitssignaler, men viser noen bekymringsområder that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review sikkerhet and vedlikehold signals before production deployment.
Hva er tillitspoengene til Phate?
Phate har en Nerq-tillitspoeng på 66.1/100 med karakteren C. Denne poengsummen er basert på 5 uavhengig målte dimensjoner, inkludert sikkerhet, vedlikehold og samfunnsadopsjon.
Hva er de viktigste sikkerhetsfunnene for Phate?
Phates sterkeste signal er samsvar på 73/100. Ingen kjente sårbarheter er funnet. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.
Hva er Phate og hvem vedlikeholder det?
| Utvikler | Unknown |
| Kategori | Uncategorized |
| Stjerner | 535 |
| Kilde | https://github.com/KrishnaswamyLab/PHATE |
Regulatorisk samsvar
| EU AI Act Risk Class | Not assessed |
| Compliance Score | 73/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
What Is Phate?
Phate is a software tool in the uncategorized category: PHATE (Potential of Heat-diffusion for Affinity-based Transition Embedding) is a tool for visualizing high dimensional data.. It has 535 GitHub stars. Nerq Trust Score: 66/100 (C).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including sikkerhet vulnerabilities, vedlikehold activity, license samsvar, and fellesskapsadopsjon.
How Nerq Assesses Phate's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensjoner. Here is how Phate performs in each:
- Sikkerhet (0/100): Phate's sikkerhet posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, sikkerhet policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Vedlikehold (0/100): Phate is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (0/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API dokumentasjon, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (73/100): Phate is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Basert på GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 66.1/100 (C) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.
Who Should Use Phate?
Phate is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with uncategorized tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Phate is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its sikkerhet posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.
How to Verify Phate's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Gjennomgå repository's sikkerhet policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active vedlikehold.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for kjente sårbarheter in Phate's dependency tree. - Anmeldelse permissions — Understand what access Phate requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Phate in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=KrishnaswamyLab/PHATE - Gjennomgå license — Confirm that Phate's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses sikkerhet concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Phate
When evaluating whether Phate is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Phate processes, stores, and transmits your data. Gjennomgå tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Phate's dependency tree for kjente sårbarheter. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher sikkerhet risk.
Regularly check for updates to Phate. Sikkerhet patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Phate connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Phate's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Phate in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Best Practices for Using Phate Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Phate while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Phate is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and samsvar with your sikkerhet policies.
Ensure Phate and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from sikkerhet patches.
Grant Phate only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Phate's sikkerhet advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Phate is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Phate?
Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Phate in these scenarios:
- Production environments handling sensitive customer data
- Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) without additional samsvar review
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
For each scenario, evaluate whether Phate's trust score of 66.1/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual sikkerhet assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.
How Phate Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among uncategorized tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Phate's score of 66.1/100 is above the category average of 62/100.
This positions Phate favorably among uncategorized tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimensjoner.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderat in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Phate and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or vedlikehold patterns change, Phate's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to sikkerhet and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced vedlikehold, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Phate's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=KrishnaswamyLab/PHATE&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — sikkerhet, vedlikehold, dokumentasjon, samsvar, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Phate are strengthening or weakening over time.
Viktigste punkter
- Phate has a Trust Score of 66.1/100 (C) and is not yet Nerq Verified.
- Phate shows moderat trust signals. Conduct thorough due diligence before deploying to production environments.
- Among uncategorized tools, Phate scores above the category average of 62/100, demonstrating above-average reliability.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Ofte stilte spørsmål
Er Phate trygt?
Hva er tillitspoengene til Phate?
Hva er tryggere alternativer til Phate?
Hvor ofte oppdateres Phates sikkerhetspoeng?
Kan jeg bruke Phate i et regulert miljø?
Se også
Disclaimer: Nerqs tillitspoeng er automatiserte vurderinger basert på offentlig tilgjengelige signaler. De utgjør ikke anbefalinger eller garantier. Utfør alltid din egen verifisering.