Este Openclawassistant sigur?
Openclawassistant — Nerq Trust Score 60.6/100 (Nota C+). Scor bazat pe 5 independent trust signals.
Openclawassistant este un software tool cu un Scor de Încredere Nerq de 60.6/100 (C+), based on 5 dimensiuni independente de date. Securitate: 0/100. Mentenanță: 1/100. Popularitate: 0/100. Date provenite din multiple surse publice inclusiv registre de pachete, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev și OpenSSF Scorecard. Ultima actualizare: n/a. Date citibile de mașină (JSON).
Este Openclawassistant sigur?
Detalii scor de încredere — Openclawassistant has a Nerq Trust Score of 60.6/100 (C+). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.
Care este scorul de încredere al Openclawassistant?
Openclawassistant are un Nerq Trust Score de 60.6/100 cu nota C+. Acest scor se bazează pe 5 dimensiuni măsurate independent, inclusiv securitate, întreținere și adopție comunitară.
Care sunt principalele constatări de securitate pentru Openclawassistant?
Cel mai puternic semnal al Openclawassistant este conformitate la 84/100. Nu au fost detectate vulnerabilități cunoscute.
Ce este Openclawassistant și cine îl întreține?
| Autor | yuga-hashimoto |
| Categorie | Communication |
| Stele | 41 |
| Sursă | https://github.com/yuga-hashimoto/OpenClawAssistant |
| Protocols | rest |
Conformitate reglementară
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 84/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Alternative populare în communication
What Is Openclawassistant?
Openclawassistant is a software tool in the communication category: An Android voice assistant app with customizable wake words and system integration.. It has 41 GitHub stars. Nerq Trust Score: 61/100 (C+).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including securitate vulnerabilities, mentenanță activity, license conformitate, and adoptare comunitară.
How Nerq Assesses Openclawassistant's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensiuni. Here is how Openclawassistant performs in each:
- Securitate (0/100): Openclawassistant's securitate posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, securitate policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Mentenanță (1/100): Openclawassistant is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API documentație, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (84/100): Openclawassistant is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Bazat pe GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 60.6/100 (C+) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.
Who Typically Evaluates Openclawassistant?
Openclawassistant is commonly evaluated by:
- Developers and teams working with communication tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
How to read the signals: Openclawassistant's measured signals (securitate 0/100, mentenanță 1/100, documentație 1/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.
How to Verify Openclawassistant's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Verificați repository's securitate policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active mentenanță.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Openclawassistant's dependency tree. - Recenzie permissions — Understand what access Openclawassistant requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Openclawassistant in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=OpenClawAssistant - Verificați license — Confirm that Openclawassistant's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses securitate concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Openclawassistant
When evaluating whether Openclawassistant is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Openclawassistant processes, stores, and transmits your data. Verificați tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Openclawassistant's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher securitate risk.
Regularly check for updates to Openclawassistant. Securitate patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Openclawassistant connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Openclawassistant's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Openclawassistant in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Openclawassistant and the EU AI Act
Openclawassistant is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's conformitate assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal conformitate.
Best Practices for Using Openclawassistant Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Openclawassistant while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Openclawassistant is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and conformitate with your securitate policies.
Ensure Openclawassistant and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from securitate patches.
Grant Openclawassistant only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Openclawassistant's securitate advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Openclawassistant is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Openclawassistant
Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Openclawassistant's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:
- Environments handling sensitive or regulated data (healthcare, finance, government)
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
- Deployments with strict regulatory requirements that must be independently validated
For each situation, compare Openclawassistant's measured trust score of 60.6/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Openclawassistant is suitable for any particular use.
How Openclawassistant Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among communication tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Openclawassistant's score of 60.6/100 is near the category average of 62/100.
This places Openclawassistant in line with the typical communication tool tool. It meets baseline expectations but does not distinguish itself from peers on trust metrics.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderat in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Openclawassistant and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or mentenanță patterns change, Openclawassistant's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to securitate and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced mentenanță, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Openclawassistant's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=OpenClawAssistant&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — securitate, mentenanță, documentație, conformitate, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Openclawassistant are strengthening or weakening over time.
Openclawassistant vs Alternative
In the communication category, Openclawassistant scores 60.6/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Openclawassistant vs ChatGPT — Trust Score: 57.2/100
- Openclawassistant vs jan — Trust Score: 57.2/100
- Openclawassistant vs ChatTTS — Trust Score: 55.0/100
Concluzii principale
- Openclawassistant has a measured Nerq Trust Score of 60.6/100 (C+) — a composite of independent signals, not a suitability judgment.
- Among communication tools, Openclawassistant scores near the category average of 62/100 (a positional measurement relative to peers).
- The individual signals — securitate, mentenanță, documentație, conformitate, community — are shown above. Weigh them against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via Nerq's Preflight API.
Întrebări frecvente
Este Openclawassistant sigur?
Care este scorul de încredere al Openclawassistant?
Care sunt alternative mai sigure la Openclawassistant?
Cât de des este actualizat scorul de securitate al Openclawassistant?
Pot folosi Openclawassistant într-un mediu reglementat?
Vezi și
Disclaimer: Scorurile de încredere Nerq sunt evaluări automatizate bazate pe semnale disponibile public. Nu sunt recomandări sau garanții. Efectuați întotdeauna propria verificare.