Este Docgram sigur?
Docgram — Nerq Trust Score 65.3/100 (Nota C). Pe baza analizei a 5 dimensiuni de încredere, este în general sigur, dar cu unele preocupări. Ultima actualizare: 2026-04-06.
Folosiți Docgram cu precauție. Docgram este un software tool cu un Scor de Încredere Nerq de 65.3/100 (C), based on 5 dimensiuni independente de date. Sub pragul verificat Nerq Securitate: 0/100. Mentenanță: 1/100. Popularitate: 0/100. Date provenite din multiple surse publice inclusiv registre de pachete, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev și OpenSSF Scorecard. Ultima actualizare: 2026-04-06. Date citibile de mașină (JSON).
Este Docgram sigur?
CAUTION — Docgram has a Nerq Trust Score of 65.3/100 (C). Are semnale de încredere moderat, dar prezintă unele zone de îngrijorare that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review securitate and mentenanță signals before production deployment.
Care este scorul de încredere al Docgram?
Docgram are un Nerq Trust Score de 65.3/100 cu nota C. Acest scor se bazează pe 5 dimensiuni măsurate independent, inclusiv securitate, întreținere și adopție comunitară.
Care sunt principalele constatări de securitate pentru Docgram?
Cel mai puternic semnal al Docgram este conformitate la 87/100. Nu au fost detectate vulnerabilități cunoscute. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.
Ce este Docgram și cine îl întreține?
| Autor | ikram98ai |
| Categorie | Communication |
| Sursă | https://github.com/ikram98ai/docgram |
| Frameworks | openai |
| Protocols | rest |
Conformitate reglementară
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 87/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Alternative populare în communication
What Is Docgram?
Docgram is a software tool in the communication category: AI-powered social platform for real-time PDF interactions. Nerq Trust Score: 65/100 (C).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including securitate vulnerabilities, mentenanță activity, license conformitate, and adoptare comunitară.
How Nerq Assesses Docgram's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensiuni. Here is how Docgram performs in each:
- Securitate (0/100): Docgram's securitate posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, securitate policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Mentenanță (1/100): Docgram is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API documentație, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (87/100): Docgram is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Bazat pe GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 65.3/100 (C) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.
Who Should Use Docgram?
Docgram is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with communication tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Docgram is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its securitate posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.
How to Verify Docgram's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Verificați repository's securitate policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active mentenanță.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Docgram's dependency tree. - Recenzie permissions — Understand what access Docgram requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Docgram in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=docgram - Verificați license — Confirm that Docgram's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses securitate concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Docgram
When evaluating whether Docgram is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Docgram processes, stores, and transmits your data. Verificați tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Docgram's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher securitate risk.
Regularly check for updates to Docgram. Securitate patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Docgram connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Docgram's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Docgram in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Docgram and the EU AI Act
Docgram is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's conformitate assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal conformitate.
Best Practices for Using Docgram Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Docgram while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Docgram is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and conformitate with your securitate policies.
Ensure Docgram and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from securitate patches.
Grant Docgram only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Docgram's securitate advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Docgram is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Docgram?
Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Docgram in these scenarios:
- Production environments handling sensitive customer data
- Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) without additional conformitate review
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
For each scenario, evaluate whether Docgram's trust score of 65.3/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual securitate assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.
How Docgram Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among communication tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Docgram's score of 65.3/100 is above the category average of 62/100.
This positions Docgram favorably among communication tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimensiuni.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderat in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Docgram and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or mentenanță patterns change, Docgram's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to securitate and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced mentenanță, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Docgram's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=docgram&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — securitate, mentenanță, documentație, conformitate, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Docgram are strengthening or weakening over time.
Docgram vs Alternative
In the communication category, Docgram scores 65.3/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Docgram vs Real-Time-Voice-Cloning — Trust Score: 71.3/100
- Docgram vs ChatGPT — Trust Score: 73.8/100
- Docgram vs jan — Trust Score: 73.8/100
Concluzii principale
- Docgram has a Trust Score of 65.3/100 (C) and is not yet Nerq Verified.
- Docgram shows moderat trust signals. Conduct thorough due diligence before deploying to production environments.
- Among communication tools, Docgram scores above the category average of 62/100, demonstrating above-average reliability.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Întrebări frecvente
Este Docgram sigur?
Care este scorul de încredere al Docgram?
Care sunt alternative mai sigure la Docgram?
Cât de des este actualizat scorul de securitate al Docgram?
Pot folosi Docgram într-un mediu reglementat?
Vezi și
Disclaimer: Scorurile de încredere Nerq sunt evaluări automatizate bazate pe semnale disponibile public. Nu sunt recomandări sau garanții. Efectuați întotdeauna propria verificare.