Безопасен ли Clawcontrol Openclaw?
Clawcontrol Openclaw — Nerq Trust Score 62.1/100 (Оценка C). Рейтинг основан на 5 independent trust signals.
Clawcontrol Openclaw — это software tool с рейтингом доверия Nerq 62.1/100 (C), based on 5 независимых показателей данных. Безопасность: 0/100. Обслуживание: 1/100. Популярность: 0/100. Данные из множественные публичные источники, включая реестры пакетов, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev и OpenSSF Scorecard. Последнее обновление: n/a. Машинночитаемые данные (JSON).
Безопасен ли Clawcontrol Openclaw?
Детали рейтинга доверия — Clawcontrol Openclaw has a Nerq Trust Score of 62.1/100 (C). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.
Каков рейтинг доверия Clawcontrol Openclaw?
Clawcontrol Openclaw имеет Nerq Trust Score 62.1/100 с оценкой C. Этот балл основан на 5 независимо измеренных параметрах, включая безопасность, обслуживание и принятие сообществом.
Каковы основные выводы по безопасности Clawcontrol Openclaw?
Самый сильный сигнал Clawcontrol Openclaw — соответствие на уровне 84/100. Известных уязвимостей не обнаружено.
Что такое Clawcontrol Openclaw и кто его поддерживает?
| Разработчик | jamesshedden |
| Категория | Communication |
| Источник | https://github.com/jamesshedden/clawcontrol-openclaw |
| Protocols | rest · websocket |
Соответствие нормативам
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 84/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Популярные альтернативы в communication
Clawcontrol Openclaw на других платформах
Тот же разработчик/компания в других реестрах:
What Is Clawcontrol Openclaw?
Clawcontrol Openclaw is a software tool in the communication category: An AI agent plugin for ClawControl. Nerq Trust Score: 62/100 (C).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including безопасность vulnerabilities, обслуживание activity, license соответствие, and принятие сообществом.
How Nerq Assesses Clawcontrol Openclaw's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five показателей. Here is how Clawcontrol Openclaw performs in each:
- Безопасность (0/100): Clawcontrol Openclaw's безопасность posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, безопасность policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Обслуживание (1/100): Clawcontrol Openclaw is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (0/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API документация, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (84/100): Clawcontrol Openclaw is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. На основе GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 62.1/100 (C) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.
Who Typically Evaluates Clawcontrol Openclaw?
Clawcontrol Openclaw is commonly evaluated by:
- Developers and teams working with communication tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
How to read the signals: Clawcontrol Openclaw's measured signals (безопасность 0/100, обслуживание 1/100, документация 0/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.
How to Verify Clawcontrol Openclaw's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Проверьте repository's безопасность policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active обслуживание.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Clawcontrol Openclaw's dependency tree. - Отзыв permissions — Understand what access Clawcontrol Openclaw requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Clawcontrol Openclaw in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=clawcontrol-openclaw - Проверьте license — Confirm that Clawcontrol Openclaw's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses безопасность concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Clawcontrol Openclaw
When evaluating whether Clawcontrol Openclaw is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Clawcontrol Openclaw processes, stores, and transmits your data. Проверьте tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Clawcontrol Openclaw's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher безопасность risk.
Regularly check for updates to Clawcontrol Openclaw. Безопасность patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Clawcontrol Openclaw connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Clawcontrol Openclaw's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Clawcontrol Openclaw in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Clawcontrol Openclaw and the EU AI Act
Clawcontrol Openclaw is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's соответствие assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal соответствие.
Best Practices for Using Clawcontrol Openclaw Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Clawcontrol Openclaw while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Clawcontrol Openclaw is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and соответствие with your безопасность policies.
Ensure Clawcontrol Openclaw and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from безопасность patches.
Grant Clawcontrol Openclaw only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Clawcontrol Openclaw's безопасность advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Clawcontrol Openclaw is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Clawcontrol Openclaw
Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Clawcontrol Openclaw's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:
- Environments handling sensitive or regulated data (healthcare, finance, government)
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
- Deployments with strict regulatory requirements that must be independently validated
For each situation, compare Clawcontrol Openclaw's measured trust score of 62.1/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Clawcontrol Openclaw is suitable for any particular use.
How Clawcontrol Openclaw Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among communication tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Clawcontrol Openclaw's score of 62.1/100 is above the category average of 62/100.
This positions Clawcontrol Openclaw favorably among communication tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust показателей.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks умеренный in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Clawcontrol Openclaw and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or обслуживание patterns change, Clawcontrol Openclaw's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to безопасность and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced обслуживание, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Clawcontrol Openclaw's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=clawcontrol-openclaw&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — безопасность, обслуживание, документация, соответствие, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Clawcontrol Openclaw are strengthening or weakening over time.
Clawcontrol Openclaw vs Альтернативы
In the communication category, Clawcontrol Openclaw scores 62.1/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Clawcontrol Openclaw vs Real-Time-Voice-Cloning — Trust Score: 56.9/100
- Clawcontrol Openclaw vs ChatGPT — Trust Score: 59.4/100
- Clawcontrol Openclaw vs jan — Trust Score: 64.4/100
Основные выводы
- Clawcontrol Openclaw has a measured Nerq Trust Score of 62.1/100 (C) — a composite of independent signals, not a suitability judgment.
- Among communication tools, Clawcontrol Openclaw scores above the category average of 62/100 (a positional measurement relative to peers).
- The individual signals — безопасность, обслуживание, документация, соответствие, community — are shown above. Weigh them against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via Nerq's Preflight API.
Часто задаваемые вопросы
Безопасен ли Clawcontrol Openclaw?
Каков рейтинг доверия Clawcontrol Openclaw?
Какие более безопасные альтернативы Clawcontrol Openclaw?
Как часто обновляется оценка безопасности Clawcontrol Openclaw?
Могу ли я использовать Clawcontrol Openclaw в регулируемой среде?
См. также
Disclaimer: Рейтинги доверия Nerq — это автоматические оценки, основанные на публично доступных сигналах. Они не являются рекомендацией или гарантией. Всегда проводите собственную проверку.