Is Docs Safe?
Docs — Nerq Trust Score 46.2/100 (D grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-03-24
Docs is a PHP package with a Nerq Trust Score of 46.2/100 (D), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-03-24 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from packagist.org, GitHub, and NVD. Last updated: 2026-03-24. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Docs safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Docs has a Nerq Trust Score of 46.2/100 (D). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-03-24).
What is Docs's trust score?
Docs has a Nerq Trust Score of 46.2/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Docs?
Docs's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Docs and who maintains it?
| Author | aeonis |
| Category | PHP Packages |
| Source | N/A |
Similar Packagist by Trust Score
Safety Guide: Docs
What is Docs?
Docs is a PHP package — Aeonis' Open Source Docs.
How to Verify Safety
Run composer audit. Check packagist.org.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=aeonis/docs
Key Safety Concerns for PHP package
When evaluating any PHP package, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, PHP compatibility.
Measured Signals
Docs has a Nerq Trust Score of 46/100 (D). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Docs has a Trust Score of 46/100 (D).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Docs Safe?
What is Docs's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Docs?
Does Docs have known vulnerabilities?
Is Docs actively maintained?
Popular in PHP Packages
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.