Is Agibotworld Alpha Safe?

Agibotworld Alpha — Nerq Trust Score 57.3/100 (D grade). Based on analysis of 4 trust dimensions, it is has notable safety concerns. Last updated: 2026-05-27.

Use Agibotworld Alpha with some caution. Agibotworld Alpha is a software tool with a Nerq Trust Score of 57.3/100 (D), based on 4 independent data dimensions. Below the recommended threshold of 70. Maintenance: 0/100. Popularity: 1/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-05-27. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Agibotworld Alpha safe?

CAUTION — Agibotworld Alpha has a Nerq Trust Score of 57.3/100 (D). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.

Security Analysis → Agibotworld Alpha Privacy Report →

What is Agibotworld Alpha's trust score?

Agibotworld Alpha has a Nerq Trust Score of 57.3/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 4 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Compliance
100
Maintenance
0
Documentation
0
Popularity
1

What are the key security findings for Agibotworld Alpha?

Agibotworld Alpha's strongest signal is compliance at 100/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Maintenance: 0/100 — low maintenance activity
Compliance: 100/100 — covers 52 of 52 jurisdictions
Documentation: 0/100 — limited documentation
Popularity: 1/100 — 210 stars on huggingface dataset full

What is Agibotworld Alpha and who maintains it?

Authoragibot-world
CategoryAi Assistant
Stars210
Sourcehttps://huggingface.co/datasets/agibot-world/AgiBotWorld-Alpha
Protocolshuggingface_hub

Regulatory Compliance

EU AI Act Risk ClassNot assessed
Compliance Score100/100
JurisdictionsAssessed across 52 jurisdictions

What Is Agibotworld Alpha?

Agibotworld Alpha is a software tool in the AI assistant category: N/A. It has 210 GitHub stars. Nerq Trust Score: 57/100 (D).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.

How Nerq Assesses Agibotworld Alpha's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Agibotworld Alpha performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 57.3/100 (D) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.

Who Should Use Agibotworld Alpha?

Agibotworld Alpha is designed for:

Risk guidance: Agibotworld Alpha is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its security posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.

How to Verify Agibotworld Alpha's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — Review the repository security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Agibotworld Alpha's dependency tree.
  3. Review permissions — Understand what access Agibotworld Alpha requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Agibotworld Alpha in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=AgiBotWorld-Alpha
  6. Review the license — Confirm that Agibotworld Alpha's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Agibotworld Alpha

When evaluating whether Agibotworld Alpha is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Agibotworld Alpha processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency security

Check Agibotworld Alpha's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Agibotworld Alpha. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Agibotworld Alpha connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP compliance

Verify that Agibotworld Alpha's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Agibotworld Alpha in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Best Practices for Using Agibotworld Alpha Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Agibotworld Alpha while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Agibotworld Alpha is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Agibotworld Alpha and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Agibotworld Alpha only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for security advisories

Subscribe to Agibotworld Alpha's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Agibotworld Alpha is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

When Should You Avoid Agibotworld Alpha?

Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Agibotworld Alpha in these scenarios:

For each scenario, evaluate whether Agibotworld Alpha's trust score of 57.3/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual security assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.

How Agibotworld Alpha Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among AI assistant tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Agibotworld Alpha's score of 57.3/100 is near the category average of 62/100.

This places Agibotworld Alpha in line with the typical AI assistant tool tool. It meets baseline expectations but does not distinguish itself from peers on trust metrics.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Agibotworld Alpha and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Agibotworld Alpha's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Agibotworld Alpha's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=AgiBotWorld-Alpha&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Agibotworld Alpha are strengthening or weakening over time.

Key Takeaways

Detailed Score Analysis

DimensionScore
Maintenance0/100
Popularity1/100

Based on 2 dimensions. Data from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard.

What data does Agibotworld Alpha collect?

Privacy assessment for Agibotworld Alpha is not yet available. See our methodology for how Nerq measures privacy, or the public privacy review for any community-contributed notes.

Is Agibotworld Alpha secure?

Security score: under assessment. Review security practices and consider alternatives with higher security scores for sensitive use cases.

Nerq monitors this entity against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases for ongoing security assessment.

Full analysis: Agibotworld Alpha Security Report

How we calculated this score

Agibotworld Alpha's trust score of 57.3/100 (D) is computed from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. The score reflects 2 independent dimensions: maintenance (0/100), popularity (1/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.

Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.

This page was last reviewed on May 27, 2026. Data version: 1.0.

Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Agibotworld Alpha Safe?
Use with some caution. AgiBotWorld-Alpha with a Nerq Trust Score of 57.3/100 (D). Strongest signal: compliance (100/100). Score based on Maintenance (0/100), Popularity (1/100), Documentation (0/100).
What is Agibotworld Alpha's trust score?
AgiBotWorld-Alpha: 57.3/100 (D). Score based on Maintenance (0/100), Popularity (1/100), Documentation (0/100). Compliance: 100/100. Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=AgiBotWorld-Alpha
What are safer alternatives to Agibotworld Alpha?
In the Ai Assistant category, more software tools are being analyzed — check back soon. AgiBotWorld-Alpha scores 57.3/100.
How often is Agibotworld Alpha's safety score updated?
Nerq continuously monitors Agibotworld Alpha and updates its trust score as new data becomes available. Current: 57.3/100 (D), last verified 2026-05-27. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=AgiBotWorld-Alpha
Can I use Agibotworld Alpha in a regulated environment?
Agibotworld Alpha has not reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. Additional due diligence is recommended.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy