Is Alefragnani.Bookmarks Safe?
Alefragnani.Bookmarks — Nerq Trust Score 59.8/100 (C grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12
Alefragnani.Bookmarks is a VS Code extension with a Nerq Trust Score of 59.8/100 (C), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 90/100. Data sourced from VS Code Marketplace metadata, publisher verification, installs, and ratings. Last updated: 2026-04-12. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Alefragnani.Bookmarks safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Alefragnani.Bookmarks has a Nerq Trust Score of 59.8/100 (C). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-04-12).
What is Alefragnani.Bookmarks's trust score?
Alefragnani.Bookmarks has a Nerq Trust Score of 59.8/100, earning a C grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Alefragnani.Bookmarks?
Alefragnani.Bookmarks's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Alefragnani.Bookmarks and who maintains it?
| Author | Alessandro Fragnani |
| Category | VS Code Extensions |
| Source | N/A |
Similar Vscode by Trust Score
Compare
Safety Guide: Alefragnani.Bookmarks
What is Alefragnani.Bookmarks?
Alefragnani.Bookmarks is a VS Code extension — Mark lines and jump to them.
How to Verify Safety
Check marketplace ratings and publisher verification. Review telemetry settings.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=alefragnani.Bookmarks
Key Safety Concerns for VS Code extension
When evaluating any VS Code extension, watch for: code execution scope, telemetry, supply chain risk.
Measured Signals
Alefragnani.Bookmarks has a Nerq Trust Score of 60/100 (C). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Alefragnani.Bookmarks has a Trust Score of 60/100 (C).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Detailed Score Analysis
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Security | 90/100 |
| Maintenance | 50/100 |
| Popularity | 90/100 |
| Quality | 30/100 |
| Community | 35/100 |
Based on 5 dimensions. Data from VS Code Marketplace metadata, publisher verification, installs, and ratings.
What data does Alefragnani.Bookmarks collect?
Alefragnani.Bookmarks has a privacy score of 90/100. Review the documentation and privacy policy for data handling details.
Full analysis: Alefragnani.Bookmarks Privacy Report · Privacy review
Is Alefragnani.Bookmarks secure?
Security score: 90/100 (0-100, higher = fewer measured security issues).
Nerq monitors this entity against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases for ongoing security assessment.
Full analysis: Alefragnani.Bookmarks Security Report
How we calculated this score
Alefragnani.Bookmarks's trust score of 59.8/100 (C) is computed from VS Code Marketplace metadata, publisher verification, installs, and ratings. The score reflects 5 independent dimensions: security (90/100), maintenance (50/100), popularity (90/100), quality (30/100), community (35/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.
Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.
Signals last measured on April 12, 2026. Data version: 1.0.
Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Alefragnani.Bookmarks Safe?
What is Alefragnani.Bookmarks's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Alefragnani.Bookmarks?
Does Alefragnani.Bookmarks log my data?
Is Alefragnani.Bookmarks's publisher verified?
Popular in VS Code Extensions
Browse Categories
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.