Is Autocfg Safe?

Autocfg — Nerq Trust Score 63.2/100 (C+ grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is generally safe but has some concerns. Last updated: 2026-04-01.

Use Autocfg with some caution. Autocfg is a Rust crate with a Nerq Trust Score of 63.2/100 (C+), based on 3 independent data dimensions. It is below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 90/100. Popularity: 100/100. Data sourced from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database. Last updated: 2026-04-01. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Autocfg safe?

CAUTION — Autocfg has a Nerq Trust Score of 63.2/100 (C+). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.

Security Analysis → {name} Privacy Report →

What is Autocfg's trust score?

Autocfg has a Nerq Trust Score of 63.2/100, earning a C+ grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
90
Popularity
100

What are the key security findings for Autocfg?

Autocfg's strongest signal is popularity at 100/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Security score: 90/100 (strong)
Popularity: 100/100 — community adoption

What is Autocfg and who maintains it?

AuthorUnknown
Categorycrates
SourceN/A

Autocfg Across Platforms

Same developer/company in other registries:

autocfg
55/100 · pypi

Similar Crates by Trust Score

data-encoding (63)opaque-debug (63)async-stream (63)unindent (63)simd-adler32 (63)
See all safest Crates →

Safety Guide: Autocfg

What is Autocfg?

Autocfg is a Rust crate — Automatic cfg for Rust compiler features.

How to Verify Safety

Run cargo audit. Review on crates.io for activity.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=autocfg

Key Safety Concerns for Rust crates

When evaluating any Rust crate, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, unsafe code, maintenance status.

Trust Assessment

Autocfg has a Nerq Trust Score of 63/100 (C+) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Detailed Score Analysis

DimensionScore
Security90/100
Privacy80/100
Reliability90/100
Transparency50/100
Maintenance60/100

Based on 5 dimensions. Data from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database.

What data does Autocfg collect?

Autocfg is a Rust crate maintained by Unknown. It receives approximately 813,096,568 weekly downloads.

As a development package, Autocfg does not directly collect end-user personal data. However, applications built with it may collect data depending on implementation. Privacy score: 80/100.

Review the package's dependencies for potential supply chain risks. Run your package manager's audit command regularly.

Full analysis: Autocfg Privacy Report · Privacy review

Is Autocfg secure?

Security score: 90/100. Autocfg has 0 known vulnerabilities (CVEs) in the National Vulnerability Database. This is a clean record.

License information not available. Open-source packages allow independent security review of the source code.

Run your package manager's audit command (`npm audit`, `pip audit`, `cargo audit`) to check for known vulnerabilities in your dependency tree.

Full analysis: Autocfg Security Report

Autocfg Across Platforms

Same developer/company in other registries:

autocfg (pypi, 55/100)

How we calculated this score

Autocfg's trust score of 63.2/100 (C+) is computed from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database. The score reflects 5 independent dimensions: security (90/100), privacy (80/100), reliability (90/100), transparency (50/100), maintenance (60/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.

Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.

This page was last reviewed on April 01, 2026. Data version: 1.0.

Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Autocfg safe to use?
Use with some caution. autocfg has a Nerq Trust Score of 63.2/100 (C+). Strongest signal: popularity (100/100). Score based on security (90/100), popularity (100/100).
What is Autocfg's trust score?
autocfg: 63.2/100 (C+). Score based on: security (90/100), popularity (100/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=autocfg
What are safer alternatives to Autocfg?
In the crates category, more Rust crates are being analyzed — check back soon. autocfg scores 63.2/100.
Does Autocfg have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Autocfg against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 90/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Does Autocfg use unsafe code?
Check Autocfg's crate documentation for unsafe code usage. Trust score: 63.2/100. Fewer unsafe blocks generally indicates better memory safety.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Browse Categories

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy