Is Bad Safe?

Bad — Nerq Trust Score 53.5/100 (C- grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is has notable safety concerns. Last updated: 2026-08-01.

Use Bad with some caution. Bad is a Python package (安卓手机自动化测试驱动包) with a Nerq Trust Score of 53.5/100 (C-), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 90/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from PyPI registry, GitHub repository, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-03-20. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Bad safe?

CAUTION — Bad has a Nerq Trust Score of 53.5/100 (C-). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.

Security Analysis → Bad Privacy Report →

What is Bad's trust score?

Bad has a Nerq Trust Score of 53.5/100, earning a C- grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
90
Popularity
0

What are the key security findings for Bad?

Bad's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Security score: 90/100 (strong)
Popularity: 0/100 — community adoption

What is Bad and who maintains it?

Authorbony
CategoryPython Packages
SourceN/A

Bad Across Platforms

Same developer/company in other registries:

bad
53/100 · crates
Bad
46/100 · nuget

Similar Pypi by Trust Score

azure-mgmt-managementgroups (64)apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-fabric (64)asyncmy (64)better-exceptions (64)abi3audit (64)
See all safest Pypi →

Compare

Bad vs azure-mgmt-managementgroupsBad vs apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-fabricBad vs asyncmy

Safety Guide: Bad

What is Bad?

Bad is a Python package — 安卓手机自动化测试驱动包..

How to Verify Safety

Run pip audit or safety check. Review on PyPI for download stats.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=BAD

Key Safety Concerns for Python package

When evaluating any Python package, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, malicious uploads, maintenance status.

Trust Assessment

Bad has a Nerq Trust Score of 54/100 (C-) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Bad Safe?
Use with some caution. BAD with a Nerq Trust Score of 53.5/100 (C-). Strongest signal: security (90/100). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (0/100).
What is Bad's trust score?
BAD: 53.5/100 (C-). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (0/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=BAD
What are safer alternatives to Bad?
In the Python Packages category, more Python packages are being analyzed — check back soon. BAD scores 53.5/100.
Does Bad have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Bad against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 90/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Is Bad actively maintained?
Bad maintenance score: N/A. Check the repository for recent commit activity and issue responsiveness.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy