Is Build In Public Dashboard Safe?

Build In Public Dashboard — Nerq Trust Score 64.5/100 (C grade). Based on analysis of 5 trust dimensions, it is generally safe but has some concerns. Last updated: 2026-05-26.

Use Build In Public Dashboard with some caution. Build In Public Dashboard is a software tool with a Nerq Trust Score of 64.5/100 (C), based on 5 independent data dimensions. Below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 0/100. Maintenance: 1/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-05-26. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Build In Public Dashboard safe?

CAUTION — Build In Public Dashboard has a Nerq Trust Score of 64.5/100 (C). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.

Security Analysis → Build In Public Dashboard Privacy Report →

What is Build In Public Dashboard's trust score?

Build In Public Dashboard has a Nerq Trust Score of 64.5/100, earning a C grade. This score is based on 5 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
0
Compliance
100
Maintenance
1
Documentation
0
Popularity
0

What are the key security findings for Build In Public Dashboard?

Build In Public Dashboard's strongest signal is compliance at 100/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Security score: 0/100 (weak)
Maintenance: 1/100 — low maintenance activity
Compliance: 100/100 — covers 52 of 52 jurisdictions
Documentation: 0/100 — limited documentation
Popularity: 0/100 — community adoption

What is Build In Public Dashboard and who maintains it?

Authorbenjamintolystoy
CategoryCoding
Sourcehttps://github.com/benjamintolystoy/build-in-public-dashboard

Regulatory Compliance

EU AI Act Risk ClassMINIMAL
Compliance Score100/100
JurisdictionsAssessed across 52 jurisdictions

Popular Alternatives in coding

Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT
63.2/100 · C+
github
ollama/ollama
58.0/100 · C
github
langchain-ai/langchain
71.3/100 · B
github
x1xhlol/system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-tools
56.5/100 · C
github
anomalyco/opencode
64.1/100 · C+
github

What Is Build In Public Dashboard?

Build In Public Dashboard is a software tool in the coding category: AI Agent Activity Dashboard for X - Build In Public. Nerq Trust Score: 64/100 (C).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.

How Nerq Assesses Build In Public Dashboard's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Build In Public Dashboard performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 64.5/100 (C) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.

Who Should Use Build In Public Dashboard?

Build In Public Dashboard is designed for:

Risk guidance: Build In Public Dashboard is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its security posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.

How to Verify Build In Public Dashboard's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — Review the repository's security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Build In Public Dashboard's dependency tree.
  3. Review permissions — Understand what access Build In Public Dashboard requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Build In Public Dashboard in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=build-in-public-dashboard
  6. Review the license — Confirm that Build In Public Dashboard's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Build In Public Dashboard

When evaluating whether Build In Public Dashboard is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Build In Public Dashboard processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency security

Check Build In Public Dashboard's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Build In Public Dashboard. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Build In Public Dashboard connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP compliance

Verify that Build In Public Dashboard's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Build In Public Dashboard in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Build In Public Dashboard and the EU AI Act

Build In Public Dashboard is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.

Nerq's compliance assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal compliance.

Best Practices for Using Build In Public Dashboard Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Build In Public Dashboard while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Build In Public Dashboard is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Build In Public Dashboard and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Build In Public Dashboard only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for security advisories

Subscribe to Build In Public Dashboard's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Build In Public Dashboard is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

When Should You Avoid Build In Public Dashboard?

Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Build In Public Dashboard in these scenarios:

For each scenario, evaluate whether Build In Public Dashboard's trust score of 64.5/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual security assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.

How Build In Public Dashboard Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among coding tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Build In Public Dashboard's score of 64.5/100 is above the category average of 62/100.

This positions Build In Public Dashboard favorably among coding tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimensions.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Build In Public Dashboard and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Build In Public Dashboard's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Build In Public Dashboard's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=build-in-public-dashboard&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Build In Public Dashboard are strengthening or weakening over time.

Build In Public Dashboard vs Alternatives

In the coding category, Build In Public Dashboard scores 64.5/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Build In Public Dashboard Safe?
Use with some caution. build-in-public-dashboard with a Nerq Trust Score of 64.5/100 (C). Strongest signal: compliance (100/100). Score based on Security (0/100), Maintenance (1/100), Popularity (0/100), Documentation (0/100).
What is Build In Public Dashboard's trust score?
build-in-public-dashboard: 64.5/100 (C). Score based on Security (0/100), Maintenance (1/100), Popularity (0/100), Documentation (0/100). Compliance: 100/100. Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=build-in-public-dashboard
What are safer alternatives to Build In Public Dashboard?
In the Coding category, higher-rated alternatives include Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT (63/100), ollama/ollama (58/100), langchain-ai/langchain (71/100). build-in-public-dashboard scores 64.5/100.
How often is Build In Public Dashboard's safety score updated?
Nerq continuously monitors Build In Public Dashboard and updates its trust score as new data becomes available. Current: 64.5/100 (C), last verified 2026-05-26. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=build-in-public-dashboard
Can I use Build In Public Dashboard in a regulated environment?
Build In Public Dashboard has not reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. Additional due diligence is recommended.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy