Is Catboost Safe?
Catboost — Nerq Trust Score 77.2/100 (B+ grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is generally safe but has some concerns. Last updated: 2026-05-21.
Yes, Catboost is safe to use. Catboost is a Python package with a Nerq Trust Score of 77.2/100 (B+), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Recommended for production use. Security: 90/100. Popularity: 90/100. Data sourced from PyPI registry, GitHub repository, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-03-20. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Catboost safe?
YES — Catboost has a Nerq Trust Score of 77.2/100 (B+). It meets Nerq's trust threshold with strong signals across security, maintenance, and community adoption. Recommended for production use — review the full report below for specific considerations.
What is Catboost's trust score?
Catboost has a Nerq Trust Score of 77.2/100, earning a B+ grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Catboost?
Catboost's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It meets the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.
What is Catboost and who maintains it?
| Author | CatBoost Developers |
| Category | Python Packages |
| Source | N/A |
Similar Pypi by Trust Score
Safety Guide: Catboost
What is Catboost?
Catboost is a Python package — CatBoost Python Package.
How to Verify Safety
Run pip audit or safety check. Review on PyPI for download stats.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=catboost
Key Safety Concerns for Python package
When evaluating any Python package, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, malicious uploads, maintenance status.
Trust Assessment
Catboost has a Nerq Trust Score of 77/100 (B+) and meets Nerq trust threshold. This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Catboost has a Trust Score of 77/100 (B+).
- Recommended for use — passes trust threshold.
- Always verify independently using the Nerq API.
Detailed Score Analysis
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Security | 90/100 |
| Maintenance | 100/100 |
| Popularity | 90/100 |
| Quality | 55/100 |
| Community | 35/100 |
Based on 5 dimensions. Data from PyPI registry, GitHub repository, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard.
What data does Catboost collect?
Privacy assessment for Catboost is not yet available. See our methodology for how Nerq measures privacy, or the public privacy review for any community-contributed notes.
Is Catboost secure?
Security score: 90/100. Catboost has 0 known vulnerabilities (CVEs) in the National Vulnerability Database. This is a clean record.
Licensed under Apache License, Version 2.0, allowing code inspection. Open-source packages allow independent security review of the source code.
Run your package manager's audit command (`npm audit`, `pip audit`, `cargo audit`) to check for known vulnerabilities in your dependency tree.
Full analysis: Catboost Security Report
How we calculated this score
Catboost's trust score of 77.2/100 (B+) is computed from PyPI registry, GitHub repository, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. The score reflects 5 independent dimensions: security (90/100), maintenance (100/100), popularity (90/100), quality (55/100), community (35/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.
Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.
This page was last reviewed on May 21, 2026. Data version: 0.0.
Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Catboost Safe?
What is Catboost's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Catboost?
Does Catboost have known vulnerabilities?
Is Catboost actively maintained?
Popular in Python Packages
Browse Categories
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.