Is Cisa Threat Intelligence Safe?

Cisa Threat Intelligence — Nerq Trust Score 43.4/100 (E grade). Score based on 3 independent trust signals.

Cisa Threat Intelligence is a software tool with a Nerq Trust Score of 43.4/100 (E), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Maintenance: 0/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: n/a. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Cisa Threat Intelligence safe?

Trust Score Breakdown — Cisa Threat Intelligence has a Nerq Trust Score of 43.4/100 (E). Measured across 3 independent trust signals.

Security Analysis → Cisa Threat Intelligence Privacy Report →

What is Cisa Threat Intelligence's trust score?

Cisa Threat Intelligence has a Nerq Trust Score of 43.4/100, earning a E grade. This score is based on 3 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Maintenance
0
Documentation
0
Popularity
0

What are the key security findings for Cisa Threat Intelligence?

Cisa Threat Intelligence's strongest signal is maintenance at 0/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.

Maintenance: 0/100 — low maintenance activity
Documentation: 0/100 — limited documentation
Popularity: 0/100 — 1 stars on pulsemcp

What is Cisa Threat Intelligence and who maintains it?

Authorhttps://github.com/wcoppedge/cisa-threat-intelligence-mcp-server
CategorySecurity
Stars1
Sourcehttps://github.com/wcoppedge/cisa-threat-intelligence-mcp-server

Popular Alternatives in security

bee-san/Ciphey
63.4/100 · C
github
usestrix/strix
64.4/100 · C
github
SWE-agent/SWE-agent
76.9/100 · B
github
promptfoo/promptfoo
82.0/100 · A
github
TecharoHQ/anubis
62.9/100 · C
github

What Is Cisa Threat Intelligence?

Cisa Threat Intelligence is a security tool: Integrates with CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog and NVD data for cybersecurity teams.. It has 1 GitHub stars. Nerq Trust Score: 43/100 (E).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.

How Nerq Assesses Cisa Threat Intelligence's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Cisa Threat Intelligence performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 43.4/100 (E) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.

Who Typically Evaluates Cisa Threat Intelligence?

Cisa Threat Intelligence is commonly evaluated by:

How to read the signals: Cisa Threat Intelligence's measured signals (maintenance 0/100, documentation 0/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.

How to Verify Cisa Threat Intelligence's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — Review the repository security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Cisa Threat Intelligence's dependency tree.
  3. Review permissions — Understand what access Cisa Threat Intelligence requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Cisa Threat Intelligence in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=CISA Threat Intelligence
  6. Review the license — Confirm that Cisa Threat Intelligence's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Cisa Threat Intelligence

When evaluating whether Cisa Threat Intelligence is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Cisa Threat Intelligence processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency security

Check Cisa Threat Intelligence's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Cisa Threat Intelligence. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Cisa Threat Intelligence connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP compliance

Verify that Cisa Threat Intelligence's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Cisa Threat Intelligence in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Best Practices for Using Cisa Threat Intelligence Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Cisa Threat Intelligence while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Cisa Threat Intelligence is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Cisa Threat Intelligence and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Cisa Threat Intelligence only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for security advisories

Subscribe to Cisa Threat Intelligence's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Cisa Threat Intelligence is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Cisa Threat Intelligence

Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Cisa Threat Intelligence's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:

For each situation, compare Cisa Threat Intelligence's measured trust score of 43.4/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Cisa Threat Intelligence is suitable for any particular use.

How Cisa Threat Intelligence Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among security tools, the average Trust Score is 67/100. Cisa Threat Intelligence's score of 43.4/100 is below the category average of 67/100.

This suggests that Cisa Threat Intelligence trails behind many comparable security tools. Organizations with strict security requirements should evaluate whether higher-scoring alternatives better meet their needs.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Cisa Threat Intelligence and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Cisa Threat Intelligence's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Cisa Threat Intelligence's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=CISA Threat Intelligence&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Cisa Threat Intelligence are strengthening or weakening over time.

Cisa Threat Intelligence vs Alternatives

In the security category, Cisa Threat Intelligence scores 43.4/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Cisa Threat Intelligence Safe?
CISA Threat Intelligence with a Nerq Trust Score of 43.4/100 (E). Strongest signal: maintenance (0/100). Score based on Maintenance (0/100), Popularity (0/100), Documentation (0/100).
What is Cisa Threat Intelligence's trust score?
CISA Threat Intelligence: 43.4/100 (E). Score based on Maintenance (0/100), Popularity (0/100), Documentation (0/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=CISA Threat Intelligence
What are safer alternatives to Cisa Threat Intelligence?
In the Security category, higher-rated alternatives include bee-san/Ciphey (63/100), usestrix/strix (64/100), SWE-agent/SWE-agent (77/100). CISA Threat Intelligence scores 43.4/100.
How often is Cisa Threat Intelligence's safety score updated?
Nerq recomputes Cisa Threat Intelligence's trust score as new data becomes available. Current: 43.4/100 (E). API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=CISA Threat Intelligence
Can I use Cisa Threat Intelligence in a regulated environment?
Cisa Threat Intelligence: 43.4/100 (E). Compliance signals are shown in the breakdown above. Evaluate against your own regulatory requirements.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy